Roaches not universal?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by psychocat

I always find it amusing when Americans believe they are the masters of a language they borrowed. :o
Roach is a term that has been used by brits for many years and it can hardly be called a filter since it does no such thing.
Filters do just that ,they filter, since a roach has no filtering qualities why call it a filter? ;)

Answers on a Bud lable to the institute for correct English please. :smokin:

---

damn you beat me to it. i was going to point out that a roach didnt filter anything out. ah well. but then again i must be retarded for calling a roach a roach and not a filter :dance:

Its just a regional thing. Almost nobody around here uses roaches. We also roll with no tobacco filler. There is no right or wrong, its just your style.

ive smoked a joint with a friend before when i was peaking on shrooms, i ate a 1/8 full of caps and when we were smoking the joint, we didnt have a filter so we were just gonna see who could take the last hit without pussing out. So i take a hit and its almsot done, burnt my fingers. and when i watch him try and take a hit, i swear that he smoked the rest of the thing and it just turned into ash and blew away on the wind. i had to shut my eyes for a second and when i opened them he was packing the rest into a bowl, lol it was sweet