Originally Posted by vegetabongrips
Those were NOT, NOT the only factors which made Westminster Mall determined to be a public entity. There were a SLEW of reasons, those two happen to be the ONLY two reasons in common.
To be completely honest, it's arguable either way. It is definitely not clear cut in either direction, but I'd side with "if it only has 2 out of the 10 reasons, it probably isn't going to meet the same standard." There have been malls across the nation which, including police departments, were found to be private entities. Granted, we're talking about a state supreme court case, but we're also talking about it in reference to a federal right.