If 420 is legalized 100% in november...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leadmagnet

This ain't politically correct and I would certainly never admit this in public but it's fun to shoot bottles and cans while a little stoned and after sipping a little moonshine or some such.

And yes I'm non-violent.

---

Point Proven

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aceofbase

Bottles dont shoot back

---

Yes, bottles are inanimate objects which don't shoot back. Your point?

back to legal cannabis before the thred got hijacked on a tangent.
all i know is i will grow and sell at the current price for the area i live in.i will use the allowed space what ever the state says i can use to its fullest,probably chronic strain.
and screw all this speculation going on in this thred.

if it does become legal, I will definitely start growing and would love to have a cannabis job :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by martyrprojekt

what a joke. Lets call "legalization" what it really is..."control and regulation of Medical Marijuana."

If this bill passes it is going to make a mockery of what we have been doing for over 15 years in California. It is not about recreational use, its about helping those who need it.

The people pushing this bill are the ones who will profit from it initially...the big dispensaries. So read the bill completely...and think about who this really benefits. It even clearly states that localities that do not want distribution centers...will not have it...thus, driving business to Oakland...RICHARD LEE...and the big dispensaries.

Follow the dollar people. Follow the dollar.:jointsmile:

---

You are absolutely right! It's just puttin; the money somewhere else. Thieves I say!

Didnâ??t gay marriage use to be legal in California? Yesâ?¦ until the religious right came out with their purse string wide open, and their political hack ads blazing.

If you think we arenâ??t going to get a last minute smear campaign by the same groups that brought down gay marriage, youâ??ve smoked to muchâ?¦ put down the bong!

In the meantime stay legal, get your MMJ card, and follow the rules of S.B. 420.
:smokin:
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7A8LD5NhCls[/YOUTUBE]

The discussion of guns or gun laws does not belong here.

So. If the legalization passes muster, there will be a good deal of restrictions on it's distribution and sales and that seems to be concern to growers?

I don't read anything in it that will change in any way manner or form medical marijuana. Currently CA breathes a sigh of relief from Obama's mandate to justice, but no grower is totally free of paranoia concerning the feds. Furthermore, I highly doubt many people with the capability and wherewithal to successfully grow MJ are being held back by the current environment of medical marijuana card accessibility. I see a large increase in demand.

What's of more concern from my perspective of a small grower is the overall national move towards acceptance of MJ. Am honest economic analysis of the situation would have to admit that some percentage of product produced in CA makes it's way to other states. As other states implement programs and laws that increase local populations abilities to grow supply will increase.

Until such time as the federal governments complete decriminalization there will always be a hefty enough risk involved to somewhat deter the casual potential grower.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by martyrprojekt

Miscog...



For example: How are they supposed to enforce DWI laws. There is no breathalizer for marijuana DWI cases. They have to rely on a blood or urine specimen collected at their processing centerswhose tests will of course test positive for people like me. Even though I only smoke at night.

---

Wouldn't it be great once pot is legalized in November, the government uses some of those newly acquired tax dollars to develop an accurate test for drivers who are under the influence of bud.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C420online

Wouldn't it be great once pot is legalized in November, the government uses some of those newly acquired tax dollars to develop an accurate test for drivers who are under the influence of bud.

---

What? Are you suggesting that the GOVERNMENT use tax money for a useful and constructive purpose? ARE YOU HIGH?

:rasta: