Even 9/11 can not wake the Lemmings.
Printable View
Even 9/11 can not wake the Lemmings.
Ha, lemmings is right. My favorite part, without a doubt, about the 911 bombings was hearing Bush give a speech not too long after the event where he urged people to not be seized by panic and that the best thing they could do was to purchase more consumer goods.
Really? That's actually the best thing we could do in a time like that? I could think of a few other things, like maybe ask for some straight answers as to what the hell just happened and I'm not talking about the g-d 911 commission.
Why is it that people who are in positions of authority seem to have absolutely no accountability? Oh yeah, it's probably got something to do with the fact that we're all trained since birth to have attention spans as long as a caffeine crazed fruit fly. Most people can barely hold a cogent argument or complete 2 page magazine article, so they were probably one their way to Cash-4-Titles before Bush's speech was even over.
/cynical
on 9/11 Dick Cheney was in his bunker
supervising a NORAD drill...
and what was that drill? two planes take down the World Trade Center!
that's all you need to know...
[YOUTUBE]WfW3IwyXhPs[/YOUTUBE]
Quote, "Army War College Prof. Says Military Brass Knows Mossad Behind 911
Army War College Prof. Says Military Brass Knows Mossad Behind 911, Pins Hopes on U.S. Vet Organizations
by James_Madison_Lives , 04/15/2010 Daily Paul Liberty Forum
Army War College Prof. Alan Sabrosky presents convincing evidence that CIA-Mossad carried-out 911. This echoes what the formerly Italian President and head of Italian Counter-Intelligence Francesco Cossiga said in 2007: that it is widely known among all the European intelligence community that CIA-Mossad carried-out 911.9-11 SOLVED118
Army War College Prof. Says Military Brass Knows Mossad Behind 911
First of all I have not seen Loose Change and don't know what it is.
The biggest unexplained issues from 911 seem to come from the pentagon.
How can all the metal from the plane be burned to the point where it dissapears yet all the bodies are recovered.
The hole in the pentagon did not fit the airplane that supposedly hit it.
Several professional people at the pentagon testified that they smelled conventional bomb explosives after the explosion of "jet fuel".
The only piece of the airplane recovered at the pentagon was not from the type of airplane that supposedly hit the building.
Regarding the WTC's and the other building that fell a few days later.
Why did they fall like a demolition from top to bottom and not topple.
I don't want to believe the "we did it ourselves" folks but that conclusion is impossible to eliminate at this time.
No aircraft parts found in the field.
Quote, "Aircraft Parts and the Precautionary Principle
Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True:
Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity
by George Nelson
Colonel, USAF (ret.)
United Airlines Flight 93
This flight was reported by the federal government to be a Boeing 757 aircraft, registration number N591UA, carrying 45 persons, including four Arab hijackers who had taken control of the aircraft, crashing the plane in a Pennsylvania farm field.
Aerial photos of the alleged crash site were made available to the general public. They show a significant hole in the ground, but private investigators were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash site. If an aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would have literally hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within the hole that would have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the precise tail-number or identity of the aircraft. However, the government has not produced any hard evidence that would prove beyond a doubt that the specifically alleged aircraft crashed at that site. On the contrary, it has been reported that the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in operation.
American Airlines Flight 11
This flight was reported by the government to be a Boeing 767, registration number N334AA, carrying 92 people, including five Arabs who had hijacked the plane. This plane was reported to have crashed into the north tower of the WTC complex of buildings.
Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if only a few of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been collected to positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear or just one engine would have been easy to find and identify.
United Airlines Flight 175
This flight was reported to be a Boeing 767, registration number N612UA, carrying 65 people, including the crew and five hijackers. It reportedly flew into the south tower of the WTC.
Once more, the government has yet to produce one serially controlled part from the crash site that would have dispelled any questions as to the identity of the specific airplane.
American Airlines Flight 77
This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644AA, carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, leaving an entry hole no more than 65 feet wide.
Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to produce serial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the equipment removed from the building was actually hidden from public view.
Conclusion
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the governmentâ??s theoretical version of what actually caused the total destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. That is the problem with the governmentâ??s 911 story. It is time to apply the precautionary principle.
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our countryâ??s history.
Physics911, by Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven, 9/11/2001
dam this is fake u guys just paranoid
Flight 93 on 911, no Boeing 757 crashed near Shanksville!
Flight 93 on 911... no major plane crashed near Shanksville!
I just remembered. It was cordite that people at the pentagon said they smelled. These were explosives experts who know the difference between jet fuel and cordite.
320 current & retired U.S. military officers want new investigation of 911!
U.S. Military Officers for 9/11 Truth