So, in your deluded socialist world, it's OK for you but bad for me? Thanks for proving me right, yet again and thank God for the ignore feature... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by PicsorShens
Printable View
So, in your deluded socialist world, it's OK for you but bad for me? Thanks for proving me right, yet again and thank God for the ignore feature... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by PicsorShens
Is this guy serious? Like....really? Alright bro, if you wanna steal from the poor to line your own pockets that's your right, but karma's a bitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by iamapatient
while they do give more money, they actually give exponentially less of a total percentage of their GDP. They give more because they have a lot more money, but percentage wise they actually give far far less.Quote:
Originally Posted by iamapatient
this is what I do not believe. The whole entrie world is not going into the apocalypse because we are not going to bail them out. They want you to BELIEVE that our way of life as we know it is going to end if we don't start throwing free money at corrupt mismanaged business'.Quote:
Originally Posted by iamapatient
Some people just cant see past the fear tactics; just like the good ole bush times. "If we don't invade now were all going to get nuked!" and look how real that threat was :wtf:
simply put, the government is giving money to business'. how that is not socialism is beyond me. Oh yeah, must be because im just some "dumb socialist" :rasta::rasta:
"Redistribution of wealth from the "rich" to the "poor" is socialism by any rational definition."
- that would mean the republican party is socialist, and the usa is a socialist country
Some call socialism theft....true, but theft from thieves, for the benefit of their victims.
Today it pretty much is.Quote:
Originally Posted by maladroit
can you name some capitalist countries that are not socialist?
If that is your definition of socialism, then John McCain is a socialist politician. Fucking Bill O'reilly is a socialist by that standard.
Look. Learn what these words fucking mean. Then debate the concepts.
Also along the joke lines....
I just heard Obama deployed 17 000 more troops to Iraq.
Anyway. Guys, just stop arguing over which group of people is better.
It's a tactic which is used to divert attention from the fucked up things the government is doing. You're all arguing for nothing. Any system can work if it's played out correctly.
The whole reason these systems even have names is because some people looked at some guidelines for what this group would stand for. They decided yeh that's good, we'll do that. In the start most systems have good and bad things. Once they get played out for a bit it just gets more and more corrupt and I can guarantee even socialism, after time, would end up almost identical to what we have now.
How glorious would it be if the vast majority of people in the US actually understood something about polotics and whats best for them on a governmental level.
I would love to see a day when the election comes around and America is presented with the same two choices weve always, but instead of a winner the ballots are counted and by an overwhelming majority the nation casts a vote of "no confidence" for either cantidate.
You would be able to hear me laughing from europe. That is how funny that would be. :D
Seriously though the US needs to do away with the laughably stupid two-party system, even just adding another party, JUST ONE, would be a huge improvement.