Ya'll this dude posted once on Nov 2 08. He obviously is not coming back here to check on advice given to handling his grandson.
Printable View
Ya'll this dude posted once on Nov 2 08. He obviously is not coming back here to check on advice given to handling his grandson.
Ok, dude...what part of this statement am I confusing? The part where you say that they both are "ONLY PSYCHOLOGICALLY ADDICTING TOO" or the part where you say " NOWHERE HAVE I STATED OR IMPLIED THAT COKE OR METH DO NOT HAVE ADDICTIVE POTENTIAL"??? I have tried to "pay closer attention to what is written" and I'm pretty sure that your statements are clearly contradictory. Your back step to "addictive potential" does not fit either since the "FACTS" have long since been established that they are both psysiological and psychologically addictive, more so the longer you use them, as Jangle CORRECTLY stated. We are all well aware that some drugs have a stronger pull than others, that still doesn't have anything to do with the discussion. I also need to state that we should not even be talking about this shit, I just had to respond to this....sorry mods, especially FBR since we already spoke of this rule before.Quote:
Originally Posted by leadmagnet