cause not smokes a whole joint after 1 hit, and if u dont, you too are wastingQuote:
Originally Posted by LIP
Printable View
cause not smokes a whole joint after 1 hit, and if u dont, you too are wastingQuote:
Originally Posted by LIP
hahaha... its all about smoking snaps out of a bong, thats atleast what we call it. a snap is a little piece of bud you pack in the bowl, you milk up (hit it slowly so smoke fills up) the chamber or chambers of your piece. i prefer glass on glass bongs because i like to take the down stem out and its just a cloud of smoke straight to your dome when you clear it. imo its not a waste but more of a conserver.... just snap it kidz
Who cares? puff a blunt, toke a bong, hit the pipe, it's alllllllllllll good. :stoned:
Speaking of bongs though, i hit a four footer today. It was amazing.
I own a bubbler and it has never not gotten me high when i've smoked out of it, so who cares if it wastes a lil Tetrahydracannibinols here and there. :thumbsup:
The most wasteful use of weed I have ever seen was my dad flushing it down the toilet. NOOOOO
or my dog eating it...but I guess she enjoyed it.
I agree with LIP. If you roll the correctly, most of the smoke is paper. And if you think a bong gets you the highest out of all smoking implements, you haven't smoked that long or live under a rock. A vape will floor you. Once I shotgunned a J and the world rippled around me as time slowed down upon inhalation. That's neither here nor there because degrees of high are opinionated. Oh, and most of the time, when I smoke out of a bong or pipe it's rollin' anyway, 'specially when I grind the buds. So unless you snuff the pipe after each hit every time, is it really that different? Nah.
That doesnt make sense... So how am i meant to reply?Quote:
Originally Posted by anomaly
Anyway, you're still wrong, if you knew how to roll you wouldnt waste any weed in a joint.
Joints as the least wasteful? i guess it depends how they researched it, but smoking them normally would prove to be the most wasteful - joint is consistently burning and you take a drag now and then.Quote:
Originally Posted by LaZ
I guess bongs have the risk of thc sticking to the chamber, and contaminants in the water, but have they considered THC absorption rate? im guessing this would be much higher for bongs.
Have they taken into account environmental factors? if you were in a tent smoking a joint, the absorption rate would be much higher because your breathing in the smoke multiple times.
I shit on NORML's research.
Why hasnt someone invented a special type of water for the bong that filters out more carcinogens than regular water? meh.
I'll take another whack at this dead horse. *WHACK!* Take THAT, stupid horse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheeseOnToast
Thats where knowing how to roll a joint comes in usefull.
When your not hitting a joint, it shouldnt be embering and smoking - it should be alight still, but hardly embering at all. Then when you toke, it all comes back and burns like normal.
Between hits, the end of the joint shouldnt be smoking and should hardly be embering. THAT is how to roll a joint, and THAT is why joints dont waste weed. That's also how to get a joint to burn for along long time.
I'm not the only person who can do this - i know of others that can on this site.
The point is, if your joints are always burning and smoking, you cant roll.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIP
The only problem here is that teh average Joe Schmo simply cant or doesnt know how to roll a joint like yours or the others who can do the same. Most ppl end up rolling loosely and therefore burn their joints up quickly. So on average, joints end up wasting more weed, not because of the delivery of it, but because of human error