Printable View
the amount of thc loss in water is incredible small as thc is not soluble in water.
some thc can accumulate on the surface of a bubble before it pops releasing the majority of the smoke, the amount of thc lost is not even worth mentioning and common sense proves that water filters something bad out, look at bong water, would you prefer all that crap to be in your lungs?
Kind of reminds me of this morning. I was really high. I spilled my bong water. I get really clumsy when I'm high so you can count on me knocking over the bong or breaking something at least once. So, anyway, I packed the bowl again and started token. About ten minutes later I noticed there was no bubbling sound cause I forgot to put more water in it. Gotta love being that high.Quote:
Originally Posted by Metaphor
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefer Rogue
I'am 15. I dont think my mom would really care. She had to smoke up a few mounths ago due to nausa. She looked up pictures of dank bud with me once. It's my dad that would care and the funny thing is he used to party. I found one of his old bongs before.lol.
Well, keep on toking..
Quote:
Originally Posted by 420_24/7
Sure, THC is not soluble in water, but neither is tar. So what's your point? What are you basing your statement on (that the loss of THC is "incredible small" (sic))? Both the tar and the cannabinoids in which the THC resides stick to the water without dissolving into it. And the study found more THC sticks to the water then even tar.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefer Rogue
If NORML's and MAPS's scientific studies are accurate, then the water is filtering out more THC then tar. It filters more "good" then "bad". And I'm not sure yet exactly what your reasoning is for saying the study is wrong. The studies were done in a high-tech lab that analyzed the actual particulate content of the smoke on average. And the organizations behind the studies are reputed to represent the interests of cannabis smokers fairly well and objectively.
If you have another study backing up what your saying, by all means please let us know about it. Until then, if seeing a bunch of tar and sticky THC cannabinoids in your water makes you feel good, then leave the water in your bong. I don't particularly care to have to inhale more tar to get the same amount of THC as I get through my pipe.
I dont need a study
Im going from personal experience
I have a tiny ass .2 bowl on my bong and i can do one bowl of that and be good
When i smoke a pipe i have to go through much more than that.
Also i know a guy who drank a bunch of bongwater and he didnt get high:wtf:
Also look at bong water, smell it, taste it, would you rather that crap be in your lungs???
blunts wouldcompletely solve this problem.
So you go ahead and keep doing whatever works best for you then; do whatever floats your boat. I've got a NORML/MAPS study performed in a high tech lab verifying my personal experience that a pipe gets me high much more efficiently then a bong. Water filters out more THC then tar.
Oh... and the reason your buddy didn't get high from drinking the bong water is because THC is not soluble in water. It sticks to water; it doesn't dissolve in it. (tar sticks to water also, and doesn't dissolve in it either). Your body won't absorb THC unless it is dissolved in oil or alcohol or vaporized (by fire). If you want to drink THC and get high you have to soak it in alcohol or fat... THC dissolves into alcohol and fat. Drinking THC in water is like eating raw weed... it won't do much to you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 420_24/7
Oooh a high tech lab... I'm really impressed now =/
Worst study EVER
whats this thenQuote:
Originally Posted by jsn9333
even if the thc was not mixed into the water it would still be getting into your system.