Since you put it that way, that would be a tempting offer for easy money. Still 200K for emotional damage for the rest of your life......that's a hard decision.
Printable View
Since you put it that way, that would be a tempting offer for easy money. Still 200K for emotional damage for the rest of your life......that's a hard decision.
oh come on, emotional damage?
Yeah man, you would carry shame on your face, sacrificing your values for cash.
Now if one was gay, I think they'd be okay with it. But if you weren't......you'd feel disgusted to do such a thing. People sold themselves for smaller amounts, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't be traumatized by the event.
200K is still a small price to pay. If it was like 5M I'm consider it, because with the pain I'd have to go through for doing it, at least I'll be well off for the rest of my life. 200K doesn't guarantee that.
if 200k were enough to convince you to do it, you obviously don't feel as strongly against it as you claim...
like i said i've never met anyone who i believe is serious when they say no..... every guy i've asked a similar question that said no, was almost definately only saying no to project that oh so manly image....
But I did admit I would contemplate it. And I'm hardly the type of guy that would project an alpha male image.
It doesn't mean there wouldn't be consequences to your well-being and you would feel bad about violating your morals.
haha one time when walking around campus we were asked and I said no but one of my friends said yes then they gave him $10 for only standing nude for a half hour we were all pissed and trying to take our cloths off and get in that room.
Option A: 7 dudes runnin a train on some nasty sweaty party hoe who can't wait to swallow all their jizz and count her cashQuote:
Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
Option B: a graceful scene portraying a naked female in the form of an angel, flying elegently over an open plain and towards the sunrise in the distance
And you seriously cannot understand the difference between these two things?
I'm still not seeing it.Quote:
Originally Posted by lagstronaut
read my posts again.... you obviously are having some problems understanding here....Quote:
Originally Posted by lagstronaut
not every image that portrays a nude female not doing something sexual (i.e. spreading her self, sexual things involving someone else or shoving something in her etc) are art....
especially refer to post number 11.... it is extreme but illistrates perfecly my problem in identifying what is art and what is porn.... (again, extreme example but the point i have stands there) since i can't very well go and start posting pics of examples....
forgive i just don't understand, again i own lots of porn (probably more then the average guy)...
i'm just having problems seeing a diffrence... i mean by that same thought process alot of playboy pictures are art, not porn... since they are 'posed' in such an 'artful' fashion among random back drops....
Plus, you make it sounds like porn is disgusting, I think it's 10x better than "art".Quote:
Originally Posted by lagstronaut