Nothing puts holes in your brain.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4 2 0
Either your brain cells are active, or they aren't. You don't, all the sudden, after taking 1 pill of Ecstacy, have gunshot holes in your brain. lmao!
Printable View
Nothing puts holes in your brain.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4 2 0
Either your brain cells are active, or they aren't. You don't, all the sudden, after taking 1 pill of Ecstacy, have gunshot holes in your brain. lmao!
I just don't understand how people can dispute all the propaganda and bullshit about weed, but then they still believe and sprout the bullshit for other substances. Doesn't make too much sense to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by thcbongman
Holes in the brain? How is that still going around when it was proven wrong like 10 years ago? LOL. Goes hand and hand with the 'spinal fluid' claim...silly silly.
The whole situation infuriates me beyond belief. Prohibition has been proved not to work, yet we still persist. Ultimately, a drug is a substance you put in your body that causes a chemical reaction. Chocolate does this and it is unhealthy if consumed to excess, shall we make chocolate illegal? Fatty foods are served to children on a daily basis in schools. Obesity ruins many lives yet unhealthy food is still happily sold with impunity. Lets just ban everything and have done with it...
See the thing I don't get is how these anti-drug crusaders feel the need to exagurate their claims. It's like they think people are stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by MacWQ33
Of course nobody should make chocolate illegal. It's a food, and it doesn't REALLY get anyone high. Makes you feel happier, but it doesn't get you high like any of the drugs in the list (unless you eat excessive amounts, and not the milk chocolate kind). I think you comparing unhealthy food to drugs isn't a very good way to argue this. Maybe you should be comparing the legality of Alcohol and Tobacco versus the illegality of Cannabis? Anyway, yep. I see your point, though. Just remember that it's _ALL ABOUT THE BOTTOM LINE_. The government couldn't give two fucks about the people.Quote:
Originally Posted by drgreenthumb1238
I was using an extreme example in order to make a point. Chocolate can change your mood, I was trying to avoid the obvious tobacco and alcohol comparisons. This is because many right wingers will happily say that tobacco and alcohol if they were to be introduced now, wouldn't be legal. However they are happy to allow this status quo as it generates billions every year in taxation. Also because they claim it would be hugley unpopular for a government to try to ban them. As for unhealthy food, it costs any health service a huge amount of money every year to treat heart disease, liver disease malnutriton etc, yes it may not cause dysfunctional behaviour to the same degree that drug MISuse, it has been shown that poor diet can impact negatively on children's physical and mental development.
Any thoroughly educated drug user can look at this list and see that it is horse shit.
this is the most educated statement in this thread. This is a bullshit list if i have ever seen one. If you really think pot is worse then E then u are fuckin moron. Ive done more then half the drugs on this list and i can say i would have arrange these in a completely different manor. When they say E puts holes in your brain they are saying that it kills many upon many braincells. I would concider a hole in your brain to be multiple dead cells that were once functioning that are now not becuase of the substance. I dont need to read some article to know this, its common knowledge. As a matter of fact most of these drugs dont even kill braincells more or less damage them which can infact be repaired. I dont understand how people can say this list is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by zalami128
Steriods give your liver cancer, and its one of the last it should be right next to alcohol.
Let me just say this, there should be abselutly no study on the effect on society of the drug. Just becuase i smoke pot doesnt mean i effect society. The laws effect society not the drug, There shouldn't be a list of harmfull substances listed in a monor based on its users and society, there should just be a list of how harmful the drug is, what the fuck does it matter what society thinks, just becuase certain people are biased on pot doesnt mean its worse then E. This is a shitty way to compare substances, and its all around a bullshit excuse to make a list.
Ok maybe the was unclear. They should state that this is an study on the effect the drug has on society and how dangerous the substance is, saying that, half these drugs shouldnt even be on the list and more or less some should be added, last time i check, crack and meth were amoungst the most popular and easiest to get drugs, not to mention there 10x worse then pot and.... i dont see them on the list and there both extremely addicting, this small fact alone destroys any evidence they have come uppon. They put E on after pot and there are actual recordings of people who have died from E. Just becuase people dont use some drugs more then others doesnt mean they arent as harmful and infact most of these are more harmful.
All this list tells me is that E is safer then pot, if i started to take E like i smoke pot i would be dead is 2 days.
I really dont even care about this crap, but seriously... whats next?
Maybe they should seperate there data..... Make a list of social hazards, bodily hazards, and what ever the fuck else, they cant possible combine them all together, there data is fucked when its all put into one list becuase well just becuase alot of people use pot doesnt mean its worse then E.