Now that I think about it.... that article just made me lose faith in the entire human race. I think I'm gonna go lay in my bed for the rest of my life, now. Thanks a lot, Ben Rossington.
Printable View
Now that I think about it.... that article just made me lose faith in the entire human race. I think I'm gonna go lay in my bed for the rest of my life, now. Thanks a lot, Ben Rossington.
I just emailed him at [email protected]
"Dear Mr Rossington,
The recent article that you have written entitled "Police issue warning about super strength Cannabis" really disappoints me. By that I mean that it is absolutely, without a doubt, the worst piece of journalism that I have ever encountered. If you look at the facts, you will learn that not only is cannabis not addictive, but that it has no causal link to schizophrenia. There are not even words to describe how ignorant this piece makes you look. You are nothing but an unintelligent propaganda tool of the drug war, a brainless fool spreading the same disinformation like a fruitfly spreading feces. I even wonder how you managed to acquire a job in the first place(as if icliverpool were a reliable source for anything, anyway). What would you say if I told you that I have been using cannabis medically for two years under the supervision of my doctor(who is, by the way, much more intelligent than you), and that I am a perfectly healthy adult with an IQ of 140? I suggest that you try another profession, because journalism apparently is not working for you. "
You should all do the same. Give him hell.
Sorry, double post.
My problem with this kind of thing - and the ignorant, narrow-minded attitude which causes this all - is that, in my opinion, the potency of Cannabis is completely irrelevant. The real question - the only question - is whether or not I choose to put it into my body. Why is anybody else involved in that decision?
Good job. I'd pass you a joint, but I can't. I'll just give you some rep and smoke this for you.. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by GotWake88
I think it's funny when people say that cannabis today is 10 times stronger than cannabis of the 70's. There were strains in the 70's that had as much as 15-20 percent THC. By that logic, todays cannabis is apparently 150-200 percent THC? Nice try, DEA.
What pisses me off the most, is the front page news paper article that said "Cannabis: An Apology", where they said if they knew how "dangerous" cannabis is, they never would have fought for it to be legalized for medicinal use, as it just "causes additional" problems. Thousands of people, who could have pushed for it to be come legal, and have the power, such as lawyers, etc... now will believe this false information.
Obviously, we know it's bullshit, because we know the truth. We are patients and users, and we know it helps with a variety of things. But, for the people who are undecided on their position on the legality of cannabis, this front page article will just sway their decision to being against it.
HELLYEAHQuote:
Originally Posted by rebgirl420
Hmmm this seems to be the new horror story, diversionary tactics to distract people from what's going on around the world. A campaign of misinformation that seems to be spearheaded by papers like The Daly Mail. These sub-broadsheets that aspire to be seen as credible journalism, while running story after story gushing about te royal family. Surely they are making weed a gateway drug by these preposterous claims that its "drug peers" are class A substances? Not many people I know would link the two, ugh what is this country coming to???
mhm...yep...cannabis is more harmful than acid....right.
lol they know that a pothead will read this get paranoid and flip out lol
properganda