I believe that fire ball speaks for itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Printable View
I believe that fire ball speaks for itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Here's a pic for ya.Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Lol..still never answered the question which was "where is the plane wreckage at the Pentagon?"Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Also, do you mind sharing with us why Building 7 at the WTC just mysteriously fell by demolitionms or as the owner said "we had to pull it"???????? Hmmm?????? Wouldn't they at least warn the people that it was about to be demolished????? Very strange that they would demolish a seperate building when the government is attacking their own people on the same day. Don't you agree??!!
We've been over this. Pull the building meant to evacuate which answers your next question on warning the people of a collapse..not demolition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
if this was the case, why didn't they include it in the 9/11 Commission Report. was it not another collapse due to the attacks?Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
It wasn't a "target". I'm sure there was other destruction "due to the collapse" of the towers that wasn't mentioned in the report.Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
Son son son....you're using reverse psychology and avoiding the question again because I have you trapped. I will ask again....Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Why did they "pull" Building 7 at the WTC when the USA was being attacked on the same day? Was there something wrong with it that could have been fixed? I mean, they really only demolish buildings to make way for new buildings and the public is generally aware that they will demolish it and they like to have parties and shit too! It does take a while to plan a demolition and its very suspicious to me that they would do it on 9/11.
So if you can answer this question for me...that would be great..mmmk!!
Oh by the way Psycho, it seems you've been having problems with your NSA reports. Yea...you see we're putting the new cover sheets on all of the NSA political dissident reports. Did you see the memo about this? So if you can do that, that would would be great...mmk?? And I'll make sure you get a copy of that memo..mmk! Thanks Psycho!
Let me check my Norwegian Stompin Ass report.....nope....no new names to speak of!:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Building 7 was not fucken burning!!!!!!!! Are you just fucking dumb or something, or really an NSA agent??!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
I give up on you...I really do. Here is a pic of Building 7 collapsing and a link to the video of it collapsing be detonators. IT WAS DONE ON PURPOSE!!!!!!
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...blecharges.htm
I know this isn't as credible as Prisonplanet (LOL) but it'll have to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel from WTC Building 7
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...rman-0112.html
Like I stated...these people are definately no Alex Jones!
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Jeremy Bernier and Marco Fontecchio in preparing this information.
J.R. Barnett is a professor of fire protection engineering, and R.R. Biederman and R.D. Sisson, Jr. are professors of materials science and engineering, at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609.
please, come on bro, you are smarter than thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
WTC 4,5 were extremely damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 and 2.... WTC 7 had no damage even comparable to 4 and 5 and yet it fell due to "small fires in select portions of the building"
you truly scare me psycho
and could you answer one thing: i thought the gov't drug tested their employees..
Come on now! Like I told the jailer when I took my piss test for hubor privilage..."after 30 years of tokin' do ya really think it's going to be clean"?Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
Did you read the analysis?
I spent many a day in the upper floors of Two World Trade Center. When there was wind, the building swayed - it was unnerving at first, especially while in an elevators. There were two elevator banks - one was a group that went up to about the 45th floor, and another that you had to change over to to go the rest of the way up.
If a little WIND could move those buildings and many other lesser ones, what the hell do you think an airliner could do if it hit it? It would seriously destabilize the structure, that's what - and that's why it was built to collapse straight down. An architect told me on 9/11, on the subway, that they would collapse from the impact and fires, and they did.
Seven World Trade Center is the object of many law suits and investigations. More of the story of it's destruction is forthcoming. There are so many companies and government agencies involved it could take forever, but that's the way the courts work.
i have read parts of the 9/11 commission report and found major contradictions, specifically in Flight 77... i can't read all 80 pages, but ill look skim it over and see if what you're saying could apply
It's bullshit and you fucken know it!!! That building was not on fire and it was DELIBERATLY planned and detonated before the attacks took place, as was the WTC buildings themselves!! God how blind are people sometimes?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Damn Amerikan Nazis. I already have my list of NSA scum agents on these boards.
Does anyone else agree with this person that it was "damaged" by WTC Buildings 1 or 2, or it was deliberatly detonated? Funny how it took them just over an hour or 2 to set up detonators to "pull it" so suddenly. I mean...did some joe blo guy just stick detonators anywhere? I really dont't think thats legal. lol.
YOU"RE FUCKED BUDDY!!! :thumbsup:
And Psycho...if you'll remember to put those new cover sheets on your NSA reports, that'll be great....mmk!!! Oh by the way...did you get that memo?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Very compelling arguement! HMMMMM....to bad you couldn't have supplied a few supporting links to that. Oh well.......
Keep up the good work!:thumbsup:
Nazism at its finest huh! There is no way in hell Building 7 could have been damaged enough by the WTC attacks and warrant a demolition. You do realize that it takes months of planning to do a demolition right?? So why all of a sudden do they "pull" it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Inquiring minds want to know!!!
Why hello, you like to ask questions concerning pictures so I looked up something special just for you.....since you bring up the "Nazi" thing, can you expain the similarities of the pics below and also, what's your opinion on pic #1?Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
BACK TO THE TOPIC:
http://www.unknownnews.org/060214a-Barrett.html
head of Duke Univesity's religous studies department has anazlyzed and translated all the bin Laden tapes, look at his discoveries.
When this is in the article: fabricated by "al-CIA-duh"Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
I personally don't consider it as a valid independent source....sorry! If your going to put out a professional report you do it in a professional manner, wouldn't you agree?
And, oh no, I would enjoy very much for Great Spirit to evaluate the pics.....
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
so you're telling me that this is not valid...
that the head of religious studies of Duke University is somehow discredited by a stupid reference?
I don't doubt the word of the Bruce Lawrence, I followed the link....very misleading!Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
Your link title:
Bin Laden tapes are as phony as Sept. 11's connection to Islam
Bruce Lawrence link in the article:
"It was like a voice from the grave," Lawrence said.
He has doubts about the tape, and thinks bin Laden is dead.
So he feels Bin Laden is dead and that this tape was like a voice from the grave. He bases his doubts on the lack of Quran quotes in his speach.
I'd find a different source......
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
Mere coincidence. Lol. Remember though that religion is another agent of the Illuminati. It's just another tool of enslavement. These so called "Muslims" who practice Jihad are the same as Christians who hate gays, liberals, and secular intellectuals. There is no real difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
I suggest you read up on the Sufis of Islam who are the mystics, like the Christian Gnostics and Jewish Cabbalists. They have a much more open interpretation of the Quran, as there are many liberal Christians too who have a more open interpretation of the Bible. You're suggesting that all Muslims are terrorists, which they are not!
However I am more concerned with these quotes. And remember, fascism and religion go hand in hand! Listen:
"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord" - Adolf Hitler
""God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East." - George W. Bush
ANY SIMILARITIES?? IT'S NOT EVERYDAY A MANIAC LEADER SAYS HE SPEAKS TO GOD!!! ESPECIALLY IN A SUPPOSED SECULAR NATION!!
As a non-religious person, even I have to take exception to the claim that you make in the excerpt above. There IS a "real difference" between religious people of the Christian faith that hate various groups, and mainstream Islamic ones that are allied with extremists who strap dynamite to themselves to kill, fly planes into buildings, and attempt to silence anyone that they oppose with violence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Perhaps you mean to say "similarities" - and by that, I'm referring to the mainstream believers. The differences between Timothy McVeigh and the jihads are slim, but even he didn't deliberately kill himself when he bombed the building in Oklahoma. At least he got the death penalty, which is better than nothing.
This jihad is happening every single day.
We should do exactly what bin laden and his ilk wants, and cut off all ties to the Islamic world. Let them stew in their own juices for a while, and see how they like it when Americans buy no oil from them. If they cannot get their act together, tough!
Switching the subject without giving a clear answer? Now I could be like you and go off on a tirade calling you every name in the book, accusations....but I'm on a higher Spiritual Plain I guess.:dance: lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Have a good one son!:thumbsup:
All the people in the pic were having their hand out. One was fundementalist Muslims doing it, one was Nazis holden them out. So..Amerikans put their hand to their heart to pledge to the flag but the US is a fascist nation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Hell maybe the cronies told the backstabbing hateful leader Muslim Caliphs who are like the High Priests of the Jews during Yeshua's time cooperate with the state and to make fun of them who did and just copied Hitler. I don't know.
But still Psycho you must come to believe that Building 7 was planned to be demolished in advance before 9/11. It was fine and far away from the main WTC site of destruction. Plus..still no plane at the Pentagon!! That should make us question the WHOLE 9/11 story!