Printable View
Considering the synchronicity of a staged false flag terror attack by the sole remaining superpower and the Mayan prophecy of Dec 21, 2012, I think this leads to it being more credible. But thats just my opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Krogith
They know whats going to happen. :p
p.s. The Gospels were edited years later after they were originally written. I really don't rely on Matthew and Luke, but mostly Thomas, Mark and John.
No, wt7 could and looks like a normal control demo. But It was empty and allot easier to wire up the charges since you could just lay it all out on the floors. But why? Only reason I could even see that happening is if maybe there was considerable amounts of damage to its support structure. You see pictures of some holes on the side before collapse. But how do you know the foundation was still intact? Taking down that building could have just been a safety precaution.. who knows
Taken from the NIST report.
"The collapse of the WTC towers was not caused either by a conventional building fire or even solely by the concurrent multi-floor fires that day. Instead, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large, jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires weakened the now susceptible structural steel. No building in the United States has ever been subjected to the massive structural damage and concurrent multi-floor fires that the towers experienced on Sept. 11, 2001. "
"Furthermore, a very large quantity of thermite (a mixture of powdered or granular aluminum metal and powdered iron oxide that burns at extremely high temperatures when ignited) or another incendiary compound would have had to be placed on at least the number of columns damaged by the aircraft impact and weakened by the subsequent fires to bring down a tower. Thermite burns slowly relative to explosive materials and can require several minutes in contact with a massive steel section to heat it to a temperature that would result in substantial weakening. Separate from the WTC towers investigation, NIST researchers estimated that at least 0.13 pounds of thermite would be required to heat each pound of a steel section to approximately 700 degrees Celsius (the temperature at which steel weakens substantially). Therefore, while a thermite reaction can cut through large steel columns, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition."
and..
"When NIST initiated the WTC investigation, it made a decision not to hire new staff to support the investigation. After the June 2004 progress report on the WTC investigation was issued, the NIST investigation team stopped working on WTC 7 and was assigned full-time through the fall of 2005 to complete the investigation of the WTC towers. With the release and dissemination of the report on the WTC towers in October 2005, the investigation of the WTC 7 collapse resumed. Considerable progress has been made since that time, including the review of nearly 80 boxes of new documents related to WTC 7, the development of detailed technical approaches for modeling and analyzing various collapse hypotheses, and the selection of a contractor to assist NIST staff in carrying out the analyses. It is anticipated that a draft report will be released by early 2007."
St. Malachy Prophecy? 2013 sounds about right with that.. But meh, theres thousands of failed prophecies.
Even the worst prophet is right once in awhile.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimzum