What about impeachment

Translation: I have nothing intelligent to say, so I will make say something stupid, engage in personal attacks and stereotypes. I calls em as I sees em, you talk like a refuge from Deliverance so be it! Had you been to N.O., experienced the full texture of the place, talked with Ray Naggen, and looked at the response to katrina with wide open eyes, I might have been kinder, but you speak from ignorance. Anyone that has ever experienced a traumatic situation like Katrina would never put down the victims and champion the people whom are supposed to help. Come on now, do you really believe it was all their fault, if so then My opinion of you remains the same!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by medicinal

Translation: I have nothing intelligent to say, so I will make say something stupid, engage in personal attacks and stereotypes. I calls em as I sees em, you talk like a refuge from Deliverance so be it! Had you been to N.O., experienced the full texture of the place, talked with Ray Naggen, and looked at the response to katrina with wide open eyes, I might have been kinder, but you speak from ignorance. Anyone that has ever experienced a traumatic situation like Katrina would never put down the victims and champion the people whom are supposed to help. Come on now, do you really believe it was all their fault, if so then My opinion of you remains the same!

---

Have I ever been to New Orleans :D you just don't get it,do you.

Have I ever been to New Orleans you just don't get it,do you.It's a cinch that one of us doesn't get it ,what ever it is, as our conversation consists of two monologues instead of a dialogue. I'll step back and take a renewed look at your postings and see if we can have a dialogue, I'm sure we can at least agree to disagree at some point! I'm sure I was hasty in demeaning your name, I apologise!

I'd love to see Bush botted from office. The guy is a bungling idiot who has no right to be President. The way he handled the situation after Katrina, the fact that we're in Iraq, and his apparent refusal to accept the experts recomendations on what to do in Iraq (because it would be an admission that he's been wrong all along and would hurt his poor little ego) are proof of that. But what I wonder, is there enough to actually impeach him? I mean that strictly in the legal sense. Maybe its just my ignorance on the whole process but I just wonder, maybe the reason the Dems aren't pushing for it is because they don't want to go through the motions and fail because of some legal loophole.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

I take it your talking about Iraq.......

After Iraq invaded Kuwait they managed to be put on U.N. sanctions, had no fly zones, etc..........more less being punished by the international community. Now after breaking 16 U.N. resolutions, funding families of martyrs, etc....we finally had enough and decided to take action but there were "issues". WHY won't our so called allies back this? Well, AFTER we took the bull by the horns guess what.......FOOD FOR OIL! Seems our "so called" allies along with some fine folk from the U.N. were lining their pocket in illegal trade with Saddam and Sons.

Next reason............:yippee:

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

---

I thought we went there because of the massive stockpiles of WMD's :confused: Jeez Psycho, you should send your resume to Dubya himself. I'm sure he can always use a good excuse maker.

Say what you want about Bush, but at least he didn't get a blowjob! Diminishing rights, wrecking an econmy, lying your way into a pointless war, exlcusively representing conservative ideologies.... that's one thing, but Clinton had to go too far!

Maybe if he had of got a blowjob, we wouldn't be in this mess we are in! In fact I think all the neo-cons need and have needed Blowjobs to calm them the 'F' down. Invading a soveriegn Nation over sexual tension, sounds about right. Taking liberties with our liberty, No Brainer, just one little blowjob before making major policy decisions might be the answer, the only problem is with these anti-gay Republicans getting blowjobs from teenage boys, the girls don't get a chance. Equal rights for girls too is my motto. Either I'm getting cynical or the politicians moral standards have never been lower!

Getting a blowjob wasn't the problem. It was lying about it that was the problem. Clinton should have just told Congress "yeah, an intern blew me, I enjoyed it, and it's my business, not yours, deal with it...and...you'd have done the same in my shoes"

Or, just pulled a Dubya: "I'm the President and I say it's ok to get blown in the Oval Office. I'm the President, I'm the decider, and I decide it's ok, now go away so I can come up with another brilliant strategy for dealing with Iraq"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fengzi

Getting a blowjob wasn't the problem. It was lying about it that was the problem. Clinton should have just told Congress "yeah, an intern blew me, I enjoyed it, and it's my business, not yours, deal with it...and...you'd have done the same in my shoes"

---

But the court had no business in his BJ, and had no right to force him under oath to admit to getting a BJ. And in the end, he just lied about getting a BJ! Maybe in the American psyche that's worse than lying about an international threat to take us into a needless war. That and the illegal spying his own people, setting stem-cell research way back, telling us smoking weed supports terror, turning the economy to crap, etc etc etc...