Printable View
probably not i like that act of smoking as well as getting high it but that would probably disappear if i didnt get high. i have been smoking cigarettes less lately i like smoking but for those it is just so damn pointless to smoke them i havent bought any in about 2 wqeeks
Would you drink out of an empty water bottle? Would you play a guitar with no strings? Would you drive a car with no wheels? Would you buy a house with no walls? Would you smoke weed if it had no effect whatsoever?
there is no way i would smoke weed if it didn't get me high. if you say you would, you're a liar.
That made sense. :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by lagstronaut
Hell, who am I kidding, I wouldn't waste my money on something that gave me no pleasure what so ever. :p
Its like taking a rip off a bong with nothing in the bowl.. pointless.
why do you assume us who said yes are liars? that statement makes it seem like you think getting high is everything. as someone pointed out, i smoke cigarettes and they do nothing for me other then calm my nerves, why wouldn't i want to trade those in for something that could be safer, better smelling and better tasting?Quote:
Originally Posted by dejayou30
I don't drink O'douls and I wouldn't smoke effect-free weed.
Heh, cigarettes have an effect: by smoking them you avoid the effects of withdrawal. That is their effect. At least, that's why I still smoke cigs anyway. ;)
Hahaha no.
lol your sig is funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamstigator