You have just gained my respect. Not that it matters much over the internet, but still..
Becuase i'm a lazy son-of-a-bitch and you're prolly right, i'll keep it short. By fighting our own desires, by approaching our beleifs with complete objectivity, aren't we taking away what makes us truly human? A computer has no concept of faith or love. These things cannot be proven, and neither can the psychic's claim of seeing ghostly being flit around her house. But by approaching an idea with a complete lack of previous instinctual function or natural psychological structure, you're looking at it like a cold calculating machine. Does formulating thoughts in this manner really make them more acceptable than how nature originally trained us to?
Actually you're right. When I think back on anything i've ever really accepted as a higher path of thought, I have needed to rid myself of natural frailties.
However, throughout evolution we've gained intelligence. Small anomalies of genius and creativity have pushed certain concepts onto the laps of those lesser beings, and they've developed the same ideas into structures of thought. But in the same essence, everything YOU are saying can be taken into account the same way. Eventually, we'll reach even higher levels of understanding, and we'll look back upon complete objective reasoning the same way as we would upon our natural instinctive security-impressioned ideas.
For now, I admit, complete objectivity IS the only way to truly look at something. But eventually, as we gain more usage of our minds and understanding of our reality, we may very well find a completely unimaginable (at the moment) truer way of formulating our ideas.
Agree or disagree?
either way i love talking about this.. :)