Printable View
You are entitled to your opinion, as I am to mine. Your hatred of foreskins is going the way of the horse and buggy. It's OLD - and your grandchildren, if you have any, will likely not be cut.Quote:
Originally Posted by muncheemama
I don't care what you did, it's important that this barbaric practice be stopped. Your opinion is in the very small minority, and becoming less and less prevalent every day.
BTW, "Damn you!" is not a very nice way to start a conversation, Fatso. :dance:
I'm all here...
Would you circumcise your daughters too? There is no difference, just a societal double standard.Quote:
Originally Posted by muncheemama
Breukelen Advocaat, maybe you're putting female circumcision with male circumcision, I would agree that female circumcision is mutilation. Like in your second article which put male and female circumcision together, that is totally invalid for female circumcision is done in some tribal cultures as a way to control women from having sex with other men. What they do is cut the labia and clitoris out and sew the hole shut, only to open it for sex with their husband, and sew it shut again after they are done. This female circumcision is usually done when the girl is a young child, not an infant, without anesthetics, therefore making it extremely painful.
Its safe to say that female circumcision is mutilation for it makes their genitals disfunctional, but in the case of male circumcision the functionality isn't altered, therefore its not MUTILATION. So will you stop using that word, get more reliable sources, and just relax about this issue? This post is about who is circumsized and who is not, not an argument about which is better than the other.
mu·ti·late (myūt'l-āt')
tr.v., -lat·ed, -lat·ing, -lates.
To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See synonyms at batter1.
To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.
[Latin mutilāre, mutilāt-, from mutilus, maimed.]
mutilation mu'ti·la'tion n.
mutilative mu'ti·la'tive adj.
mutilator mu'ti·la'tor n.
You can dress up the term with an acceptable word, such as circumcise, but to cut off, make imperfect, or damage any body part is mutilation.
There are various types of female circumcision. Not all are as extreme as the ones that you describe.
You are supporting something that is going to become obsolete very soon, for good reason.
Children have to brush their teeth - should we pull them all out? You see how stupid this is?
This practice destroys the most sensitive part of the male body - and DOES have severe repercussions in many cases.
this thread made me laugh loads...
Both sides of the argument are valid...in their own ways
Im un-cut, and im glad I wasn't given the snip at birth...I guess if I wanted to I could get it cut off later in life....or if my g/f wanted me to....which I don't think she would....she seems to like it lol
I guess I just like having the choice....
But I dont agree with circumcision...it isn't natural imo
where did you get this idea?^^ its false by the way..... you keep talking about this like its an accesory.... my kids bodies aren't purses or shoes, I didn't do it because it was trendy and I wont feel bad if it goes out of "style"....I did it becasue my husband and I were brought up to believe it is better for my kids...the doctors told us it was better for them... I have never encountered an uncut weiner, so I suppose my view comes form one of ignorance....as i'm sure your view does as well...keep on trying to save all the foreskin of the world one weed website at a time....good luck, but if I have another boy I will do it again, no questionQuote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
are there any guys on here who were cut and now regret it...? People have body parts removed all the time, there are alot of pieces that are uneccesary, the apendix, tonsils, wisdom teeth, hair, why dont you work on those parts too? Sounds like you have a strange obsession with penises... why dont you stick one in your mouth and quit bitchin
And if I had a daughter, no I wouldnt circumsize her, why? because its not part of my culture....call it a double standard if you like, just make sure you add it to society's long list of double standards....the facts are that the world is imperfect, and people have the ability to make decisions, and just because some people dont agree, it doesn't make me wrong...
AHHAHAAAHAHAHAAAA
:D:D:D
oh that made me laugh so hard :D:D
what really counts is where ya stick it
ever hear about the boy that was born without any eyelids...? so when he was circumcised, the doctors took the foreskin and made him some eyelids... now they say he's cock-eyed
I'm a chick, so I don't really have a say in the poll.. but I don't see the point of getting boys circumsized except for the cultural thing.. and well, the cleanliness of it. But an uncut penis can stay just as clean as a cut one if you take the 20 seconds in the shower. All of the guys I have been with have been circumsized, except for one, which was an ex-boyfriend.
And coming from a girl's point of view, I preferred the uncut penis to the cut ones.