100% Proof About 9/11

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

If it was so obvious that this was faked, wouldn't the evidence point to the same conclusions for independently working researchers?

---

if they actually released the tapes from Pentagon there would be a clear conclusion; only 1 tape has ever been released.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

I have to say, I used to believe that stuff. I used to think the whole 9/11 thing was staged by our own government. It just had to be. I mean, no steel buildings had ever collapsed due to fire, right?

But now that I've really looked into the whole thing, examined both sides of the story and weighed the evidence carefully, I found that I was mistaken. As evil as I think Bush and his administration is, I just can't find any good evidence that they were behind 9/11. And it turns out that hardly any of the conspiracy theorists can agree on just what the hell went on. Some people say a missile hit the Pentagon, some say it was a military drone, some say it was a remote control plane, some say it was the plane the government says it was. If it was so obvious that this was faked, wouldn't the evidence point to the same conclusions for independently working researchers?

The WTC fires were different from fires in steel structures in prior incidents. Never before had somebody crashed jets into skyscrapers like that. Nearly full tanks of jet fuel were emptied into several floors of office equipment and set on fire. And don't forget that the structures, as you may expect, were severely damaged by the gaping holes punched into the buildings by the planes. Is it so unbelievable to think that a section might weaken and collapse, and then the weight of the top of the building would cause the destruction of the building below?

---

Welcome to the wonderful world of the neo-cons. LOL

I'm not a neo-con and I never will be. But I'm not going to accuse my enemies of things if I don't have hard evidence that they actually did it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

I'm not a neo-con and I never will be. But I'm not going to accuse my enemies of things if I don't have hard evidence that they actually did it.

---

LOL....exactly....innocent until PROVEN guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt!:thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mrdevious

So the claim is that a fire brought the buildings down, when in fact it was a sinister explosion. I wonder if, oh, say, a plane full of jet fuel could explode?

---

:D :D

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...76160&q=9%2F11

http://filmstripinternational.com/fi...lmstrip=jones2

http://groups.myspace.com/911truth

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...q=loose+change

just watch them... they are a little long, but just take the time and watch them

http://total911.info/zacmstun.wmv
this is crazy, I don't believe his testimony then [case is going on now]... and for those of you who don't know this guy, Moussaoui would have been the "20th hijacker", but US caught him in Aug 2001. BTW other detainees such as the financial advisor for al-Queda have said under oath that Moussaoui was unintelligent, and untrustworthy along with being annoying

Well i looked at both sides and am convinced 150% that it was staged by a rogue element of OUR government, maybe Bushitter didnt know anything(I doubt it)but they had this planned, ever read the Operation Northwoods doc, or better yet, read the PNAC plan, it tells everything from having a New Pearl Harbor attack to get the people behind a war, and even talks about Iraq. and the same people who created the PNAC, are the same ones that are in control of the WhiteHouse...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xblackdogx

http://total911.info/zacmstun.wmv
this is crazy, I don't believe his testimony then [case is going on now]... and for those of you who don't know this guy, Moussaoui would have been the "20th hijacker", but US caught him in Aug 2001. BTW other detainees such as the financial advisor for al-Queda have said under oath that Moussaoui was unintelligent, and untrustworthy along with being annoying

---

Well Al CIA duh said that moussaoui was inept so they cut him out- plus no telling what kind of torture they used-check out this video saying moussaoui may have been wearing a stunbelt http://www.total411.info/

Few points to make ....First with the amount of fuel those planes have that fire burned hot and burned for a long time...Second skyscrapers are designed to collapse in on themselves