Printable View
If they're gay, then there having homosexual urges. If they are just dorky and faggotty, then okay, but if they're supposed to not have sex with a woman, what makes having it with a man, okay? Priests should abstain from fucking guys up the ass, that territory's for the girls.
I think you have that mixed up, the world is producing to many people. In a span of 50-100+ years the world will be over populated.Quote:
the world can't seem to produce enough people as it is!
This isn't fully true. What about adoption? And when a male or female decides to help out the gay/lez couple, it still involves a male and female. The child is still blood related to one of the gay/lez people. You need more convincing reasons then this if you want to make an argument about homo families.Quote:
Gay and lesbians eventually want a family...now how does this get satisfied?
They break up the "male female unit", and take their children!
Personally I see anal are a gay mans sex method. I will not preform anal because if I wanted to fuck someone in the ass then why not fuck a guy. Nope sorry. Pussys only.Quote:
Priests should abstain from fucking guys up the ass, that territory's for the girls.
Sorry, I didn't mean it that way. I meant a girl playing with a guy's ass.
The scientifically correct as well as the politically correct would point out to you that 'preference' is a false and derogatory term to use for what is in fact an orientation.Quote:
Originally Posted by beachguy in thongs
Actually it's all a conspiracy to scare you witless! Oops... too late.Quote:
Originally Posted by jbuckets
By your logic, gays and lesbians are less than human. Sexuality is not all about mechanics. Food for thought: not all gay men enjoy or practice anal sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by beachguy in thongs
H O M O S E X U A L I T Y is more natural than a condom, so what's a catholic to be surprised about?
What I think he means by this is that their is no purpose to their sexual actions. Logicly thinking, a straight couple has the ability of reproducings. Homosexuals are unable to do that in their relationship, sex for them is just pelasure while the straight couple has somewhat more meaning. So in that sence he was right by saying that.Quote:
Everything they say is basically true. Homosexuality=IncompleteSexuality.
I disagree. There is much more to sex than mechanics (of reproduction or of physical pleasure), especially for humans. Unless, of course, you are suggesting that heterosexuals are the subhumans who suffer from incomplete relationships.
Maybe Aunt Ida was right: "The world of the heterosexual is a sick and boring life."
No, sorry you got the wrong idea. I was using their words. Still, I was making a correlation to you can't fit a square inside a circle. Which would be an oxymoron in this case. The priests don't want homosexual role models. I think there looking at a broader spectrum of things. Who suggested heterosexuals as subhumans? They're the only way the Human Race can survive.Quote:
Originally Posted by vincevaper
oh come on man, heterosexuals are so out. In vetro man...... (sp?) Its the way of the future.
Oh and sex is not only for reproduction. Yes u could say homosexual sex is more for pleasure, but sex is also an act of love. If a man loves a man he should be able to express this love without people saying he is wasting sperm.
That is not true. It takes nothing more than mechanics to produce babies. Ask one of the married gay men you probably know.Quote:
Originally Posted by beachguy in thongs
I once knew a guy who felt so guilty whenever he masturbated that he would immediately ask god's forgiveness for 'killing his babies.' The Vatican would no doubt consider such a neurosis as healthy.Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarmagnolia