Printable View
lol...........yeah, it would be interesting for sure. How fun would this be......Newt Gingrich vs. Hillary Clinton. Man, that would make all the talking heads on CNN, FOX, and all the rest DROOL over the political war.Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
As a flaming independent, I would love to see a GOOD candidate for once in the past fifteen years. From any party. Unfortunately, I don't see one on the horizon.
Onward!
I like rudy, and my dream candidate would be Condi Rice.
How awesome would it be to be the new guy in the Federal Pen & be like, "Yo wus up, My homies call me Scooter. That's how I roll!"
That guys ass will be a pin cushion.
HAHAHAHA, ouch.
Federal Prisons arent too bad, some have golf courses and olympic size swimming pools.
as you can see dirtyhippy, your a day late and a dollar short.
the indictment is lame,2 years and 30 million dollars for that.
if convicted he should go to prison for sure as he should.
but what about all those treason charges,outting a non-covert agent.
Even i was disappointed,the big fish got away
now on to the supreme court!
He will no dought be pardoned, if it comes to that. IMO, the pardon should be removed from the presidents powers. It serves only to protect the guilty from their crimes. I realize that would require an amendment to the constitution, but WTF, they propose an amendment for every fucking thing, why not something useful?
I heard that the judge in libbys arragnment is reggie walton, who was appointed by Bush. The law is on libby side dont u think.
Of course it is. But, (and I know this from personal experience) when you look at that piece of paper that says "The United States Of America Vs. your fucking name" he won't feel like the law is on his side. I don't scare real easy, but when you read those words, you are lucky if you manage not to piss your pants. I managed it, I wonder if "scooter" is made of as strong of stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by eg420ne
wierd how the amendment process is never used to bring about change isnt it? Ya know, like the right to privacy and abortion? Abortion was put into the right to privacy because activist judges knew it would never pass the amendment process in this country. 9 unelected officials making laws for this country.scary!!
or maybe because abortion deals w/ the handling of one's own body, as opposed to the state regulating what you can or can't do w/ your body....Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
y'know, as in "it's a private matter"?