synthetic urine...is it detectable?
YES IT IS!!!!!
I was scheduled for a pre-employment test today, and for the past week have been educating myself on the matter and found no indication QuickFix 5.7 would not work.
However, I was immediately caught. The test was through Quest Diagnostics and the process was exactly as cheifstrongleaf described. I had a QF 5.7 vial perfectly heated to 98 degrees hidden on my body, and after removing my jacket and emptying my pockets was given a cup and left alone in the bathroom.
The water in the sink was turned off and the water in the toilet was blue to prevent tampering. I emptied the vial into the cup but it only filled halfway to the minimum fill line they drew on it. I tried arguing that I had urological problems and couldn't produce that much, but the collector took one look at my cup (the quickfix was slightly neon, although not that noticeably) and called the supervisor.
Apparently as a male, my urine will bubble when shaken. The quickfix did not, or at least did not do so adequately. The supervisor then sniffed the sample (quickfix is relatively odorless), and informed me I could either wait and provide a real sample or leave, which I did.
So please my fellow stoners, do not rely on quickfix. Unless your collector is being lazy they will very easily catch on, and I just lost a very, very nice position with Intel because of the swarm of luck everyone else seemed to have with less observant collectors.
synthetic urine...is it detectable?
festeringbovine, it's guys like you who put all the nervousness into the folks on here who are looking for legit answers from credible sources. It's real simple please scan and post the results of your "test" that you eventually "passed" to prove your claim. I'm not positive because I'm not stupid enough to get caught subbing but I believe there has to be a comment put in that a second sample was required due to improper initial collection. Obviously your an idiot for not reaching the minimum 2oz requirement as you claim. If anything you did not reach the minimum and needed to provide more sample but I still don't believe you. There are no guidelines for collection that state that a sample must "foam" or that a slightly "neon" sample is grounds for rejection. A collection employee can not reject a sample based on smell, the lab will. Go eat some asparagus and see what your piss smells like then.Your full of crap and I'm tired of guys like you with 1 post who write this garbage. If what you say really happened prove it or get lost.:mad:
synthetic urine...is it detectable?
In reference to my last post. They will not reject samples based on smell. The lab will use specific gravity or PH to determine if a sample has been adulterated. They may make a comment that a sample had a bleach smell for example, but the test methods determine rejection.
synthetic urine...is it detectable?
Powerrulz is correct. 2 oz is enough for any U/A. If 2 oz is all the donor can submit, the collector has to accept it.
Collectors cannot reject samples because of no odor. Even human samples (of both sexes) can exhibit a lack of odor. However samples are flagged when there is an obvious foreign odor thats not suppposed to be in a urine sample (ie, bleach, household chemicals, etc).
Collectors cannot reject samples because of no foam. Even human samples (of both sexes) can exhibit a no-foam condition. However, samples can be flagged for excessive amounts of foam when the sample is shaken (due to the use of some adulterants, or if a person used Mountain Dew as a urine substitute).
Sample color is only an issue if its an odd color thats not exhibited in human urine (blue, purple, brown, etc)
The QF DOES NOT COME IN A VIAL! It comes in a bottle.
All of these factors (especially the vial part) lead to some huge doubt to the veracity of your story, bovine. Sounds like youre just out on a QF smear campaign, telling a total fish story in doing so. Are you a lurking QF competitor who cant stand seeing all of the QF success stories in this forum?
synthetic urine...is it detectable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by festeringbovine
YES IT IS!!!!!
I was scheduled for a pre-employment test today, and for the past week have been educating myself on the matter and found no indication QuickFix 5.7 would not work.
However, I was immediately caught. The test was through Quest Diagnostics and the process was exactly as cheifstrongleaf described. I had a QF 5.7 vial perfectly heated to 98 degrees hidden on my body, and after removing my jacket and emptying my pockets was given a cup and left alone in the bathroom.
The water in the sink was turned off and the water in the toilet was blue to prevent tampering. I emptied the vial into the cup but it only filled halfway to the minimum fill line they drew on it. I tried arguing that I had urological problems and couldn't produce that much, but the collector took one look at my cup (the quickfix was slightly neon, although not that noticeably) and called the supervisor.
Apparently as a male, my urine will bubble when shaken. The quickfix did not, or at least did not do so adequately. The supervisor then sniffed the sample (quickfix is relatively odorless), and informed me I could either wait and provide a real sample or leave, which I did.
So please my fellow stoners, do not rely on quickfix. Unless your collector is being lazy they will very easily catch on, and I just lost a very, very nice position with Intel because of the swarm of luck everyone else seemed to have with less observant collectors.
You are 100% FOS.
