FLIGHT 93 SHOT DOWN

yocass put:


how the heck did it get upside down?

it didnt have to be completely upside-down. if you shoot a plane with a missle and it starts to crash-land what makes you think it HAS to crash in an upright position. it could easily have tilted either from sheer force or the captain desperately trying to salvage the plane. oh wait, it mustve been the new secret missle system that taps into the computers on the plane and forces the plane to turn upside down.

aren't jets ALWAYS fast, regardless of their intent?
wow...well if that's the case then i wonder what a metaphor is.
just because the woman said the jet looked like it was going very fast like it was trying to get out of there DOESNT mean a jet wasnt there. you're just being speculative as if since jets fly really fast anyway...it CANT be true.


you can not show someone a picture then when they say yeah thats it take it as credible evidence. Thats why line ups have more than one person in them, people get confused easily. And the A-10 is an anti-tank weapon primarily. And almost exclusively air to surface. This is why they fly with fighter jets to protect them.
When are you going to start disproving the story? hold on...wait...was that it? Okay, so she was shown of a pic of a jet that may not be the actual plane just one that's STRIKINGLY SIMILAR. so because of a tiny inconsistency that doesnt effect the overall claims, her entire testimony is null and void? you should stand trial for a major crime one day and all your defensive witnesses should be put on the stand. if that's the case, then might i suggest anally raping yourself before you get put in prison.

warthogs are notoriously LOUD
i didnt know you were a military expert. thanks for knowing exactly what the plane was. give me a break. "moran".


A missile would cause TWO explosions. At least, one hitting the plane, and one with the plane hitting the ground.

NO. NO. NO. annnnnnnnd NO. that's not definite. if a missle hits the planes jet fuel tanks then it would be one BIIIIIIG boom. yaaaaayyyyy...we did it!!! we learned about big and small today! yaaaayyyyy. the following result would be a big CRASH... can you spell CRASH.


So it went from several thousand feet to 50 feet for... what purpose exactly? Pilots hate being near the ground, they lose their tactical advantage. So why would he go down and circle the crashsite? Its a jet, not an eagle.

Hey, mind if i throw some logic into the mix?

If you had a plan to shatter the world of every american citizen and it was on large-scale...you WOULDNT make sure everything worked out accordingly? you wouldnt ensure that the evidence of the plane crash was destroyed? you'd just pack up and assume the good guys are dead like some cheesy james bond movie? you need a reality check.


so... in half a mile.. it flipped upright already? assuming the jet was going 400 mph, that is .1 miles per second, meaning in 5 seconds the plane has flipped back upright? gimme a break.

how does this disprove the woman's testimony? all you have is a statement from another faceless witness. it's just that in this case his works more in line with the government story. you're trained man. a real tool. noone has any use for you.



so that's it? that's your magical infallible word on the issue? it's obvious you didnt give any other viewpoints consideration at all. you picked the most plastic and shallow answers to feed your feeble mind. fuck you and fuck that other asshole whose name i didnt bother to remember because he pissed me off so much.



you guys are pathetic.

Quote:

---

ROFL, she would fucking CRUSH a little fuckin kid liek you. lol, i wouldnt reccomend it. Stick to little kids.

---

so you're mom's a big fat slut that's so massive she could crush a 6'2 180 pound man? jesus christ, call the AMA. we've got a case of fat cow disease. dont worry, the mental symptoms only pass on to the kids when theyre born.



No, thats where your mom sits every night. Right on my fuck finger.[/QUOTE]

how come you gotta fuck girls with your finger? yocass too busy sucking on it for ya?


fucking retards. noone bothers you guys and calls the shit you post on crap. and you probably think youre so cool to. nobody here likes you, noone would even notice if you died and didnt post here anymore. so how about you dig the cum outta your ear and get a fucking life.


"morans". :)

wow, just as i expected, no facts or logic, and pure, 100% speculation.

secret missle system that forces the plane upside down? You smoking way too much crack, son.

....your second point is too stupid to even comment on.....

"so because of a tiny inconsistency that doesnt effect the overall claims, her entire testimony is null and void? you should stand trial for a major crime one day and all your defensive witnesses should be put on the stand. if that's the case, then might i suggest anally raping yourself before you get put in prison."

doesnt affect the overall claims? wait a sec, wanst the claim THAT A WARTHOG SHOT DOWN THE PLANE?!?? dipshit, of course that makes her testimoney null and void! That, and the fact that the witnesses convieniently asked "to be kept anonymous" making it impossible to verify her story or even grille her about it. WTF are u talking about annaly raping oneself? You have smoked yourself retarded!

*revokes nicholas's right to smoke weed*


actually, dumass, Warthogs ARE loud, being a multi-engine low-flying tank of a plane. dumass, dont spew your shit unless you actually know what your talking about.

maybe there would not be 2 explosions per se.... but the sounds of the crash would be really fucking loud... so that also completely debases this lady's claim. also, notice the quote: "At the horseshoe-shaped Indian Lake, about a mile east of the official crash site, several eyewitnesses recalled hearing â??a screaming thingâ?� that â??screechedâ?� as it passed over the golf course and lakeside community immediately before a huge explosion shook the ground." hmmmm right here it says the explosion happened on the ground.... nothing about an explosion in the air.

If you had a plan to shatter the world of every american citizen and it was on large-scale...you WOULDNT make sure everything worked out accordingly? you wouldnt ensure that the evidence of the plane crash was destroyed? you'd just pack up and assume the good guys are dead like some cheesy james bond movie? you need a reality check.

dude, what the fuck are you talking about....? do you really think a warthog plane would be able to " make sure everything worked out accordingly"???? what does it have X-ray beams, where it can see survivors in wreckage and laser them to death or something? get out of your sci-fi little world. I think its u who need the reality check. really, where is the logic there?


how does this disprove the woman's testimony? all you have is a statement from another faceless witness. it's just that in this case his works more in line with the government story. you're trained man. a real tool. noone has any use for you.

actually, all the witnesses mentioned in this story are "anonymous" that means, NO VERIFICATION OF THIER STORY DIPSHIT!

Do you believe every nut that sez he saw an UFO? ok then, why the hell would u believe every nut (like pisshead) that sez there is a conspiracy bla bla blah, a plane shot down flight 93 blah blah blah.... i belive ur the tool here, sir. A tool of this liberal anti-american propogandist pisshead.


so that's it? that's your magical infallible word on the issue? it's obvious you didnt give any other viewpoints consideration at all. you picked the most plastic and shallow answers to feed your feeble mind. fuck you and fuck that other asshole whose name i didnt bother to remember because he pissed me off so much.


My name is Hydrizzle, ya know, your biological father?

Tell me, why would rational people give any consideration to these completely unbased claimes, of which there is NO real proof exept some ANONYMOUS witnesses who might not even exist!

okay. do this.


ignore the posts pisshead put up. ignore the dozens of other links and articles pisshead that would take you to your credible info sources. just sit there like a dumbass and ignore everything i said.

my post reeked of sarcasm. you only read the wisecracks. i can tell because you blame me for speculation. all i did was merely anti-speculate. it was yocass that didnt use facts and it was yocass who speculated first.

and i noticed you called me a dispshit, stating that all of the testimony was anonymous. well then, why was that landscaper's account used to discredit my claims? do you even know what planet you're on?

like i said, too much dxm. maybe too much peyote. but what the fuck do you care? it all gets you high and that's what's important right?


i'm not going to keep this up with you or yocass. i've never used the ignore button and i never will. but im not going to keep arguing back and forth presenting (pisshead's researched) facts and pitting it against YOUR speculation that you rely so much on. even amsterdam isnt as annoying as you guys.

now off with you, you ridiculous child. grease up your mom's thigh so she can walk about. and you call yourself a good son?


asshole.

my favorite conspiracy theory is the 19 freedom hating muslims, nearly half of whom are still alive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nicholasstanko

yocass put:


how the heck did it get upside down?

it didnt have to be completely upside-down. if you shoot a plane with a missle and it starts to crash-land what makes you think it HAS to crash in an upright position. it could easily have tilted either from sheer force or the captain desperately trying to salvage the plane. oh wait, it mustve been the new secret missle system that taps into the computers on the plane and forces the plane to turn upside down.

aren't jets ALWAYS fast, regardless of their intent?
wow...well if that's the case then i wonder what a metaphor is.
just because the woman said the jet looked like it was going very fast like it was trying to get out of there DOESNT mean a jet wasnt there. you're just being speculative as if since jets fly really fast anyway...it CANT be true. Did I say that? Thats pretty retarded to say. My point is witness = dumb ass. You are relying on a dumb ass. Which makes her entire testimony... dumb. I didn't say that meant anything happened or didn't.


you can not show someone a picture then when they say yeah thats it take it as credible evidence. Thats why line ups have more than one person in them, people get confused easily. And the A-10 is an anti-tank weapon primarily. And almost exclusively air to surface. This is why they fly with fighter jets to protect them.
When are you going to start disproving the story? hold on...wait...was that it? Okay, so she was shown of a pic of a jet that may not be the actual plane just one that's STRIKINGLY SIMILAR. so because of a tiny inconsistency that doesnt effect the overall claims, her entire testimony is null and void? you should stand trial for a major crime one day and all your defensive witnesses should be put on the stand. if that's the case, then might i suggest anally raping yourself before you get put in prison. Shit man, you cant be that stupid. You just cant be. Again, proving the witness is a dumb ass... all that was. Your taking military advice from a dumb ass. Tell me. Why would the air force send a huge bulky fast loud jet made for taking out tanks. To destroy a jetliner?

warthogs are notoriously LOUD
i didnt know you were a military expert. thanks for knowing exactly what the plane was. give me a break. "moran". Yes. I am. My minor in military science makes me more so than you anyways. And yes I am somewhat familiar with the jet, it has been used very frequently in both Iraqi missions. Your welcome for me already being familiar with the jet, having studied them a little bit a while back. Do I get a cookie now?


A missile would cause TWO explosions. At least, one hitting the plane, and one with the plane hitting the ground.

NO. NO. NO. annnnnnnnd NO. that's not definite. if a missle hits the planes jet fuel tanks then it would be one BIIIIIIG boom. yaaaaayyyyy...we did it!!! we learned about big and small today! yaaaayyyyy. the following result would be a big CRASH... can you spell CRASH. YES YES YES. oh, and of course yes. Why is the plane flying so low that you cant distinguish from 2 giant, distinctive, and utterly different explosions. The only air to air the warthog is ever fitted with is the sidewinder (and very, very, very, very rarely at that) It uses shrapnel rather then blowing up the fuel tank. Your point is bunked


So it went from several thousand feet to 50 feet for... what purpose exactly? Pilots hate being near the ground, they lose their tactical advantage. So why would he go down and circle the crashsite? Its a jet, not an eagle.

Hey, mind if i throw some logic into the mix? that will be a first

If you had a plan to shatter the world of every american citizen and it was on large-scale...you WOULDNT make sure everything worked out accordingly? you wouldnt ensure that the evidence of the plane crash was destroyed? you'd just pack up and assume the good guys are dead like some cheesy james bond movie? you need a reality check. no, I would use the same technology the jets use in the attacks overseas. A)powerful imaging devices on the plane, or B) a big ass satellite. But no, I for damn sure wouldn't be a dumb ass and do what you are suggesting.


so... in half a mile.. it flipped upright already? assuming the jet was going 400 mph, that is .1 miles per second, meaning in 5 seconds the plane has flipped back upright? gimme a break.

how does this disprove the woman's testimony? all you have is a statement from another faceless witness. it's just that in this case his works more in line with the government story. you're trained man. a real tool. noone has any use for you. I cant make out your point really here. But I am gonna guess. you have 2 witnesses. One saw an upside down jet. One merely half a mile away didn't. They have 2 different sights they saw, and no one to back up anything they say. That DOES discredit both testimonys, but not necessarily disprove them.



so that's it? that's your magical infallible word on the issue? it's obvious you didnt give any other viewpoints consideration at all. you picked the most plastic and shallow answers to feed your feeble mind. fuck you and fuck that other asshole whose name i didnt bother to remember because he pissed me off so much.no.... I, unlike you, used my brain to come up with shit instead of a conspiracy theory website. Please. Use some facts. There actually are a few that suggest YOUR side of the story if you do some research.



you guys are pathetic.

---

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

1st off, thank you for the compliment, I have always strived to be as annoying as amsterdam to mindless liberals like you... :D :D

apparently you dont know what a "credible" scource is.... not this site for sure....


http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/flight_93.html

here's a few random headlines from the main page.... now tell me that this scource is fair and balanced....



FLIGHT 93 SHOT DOWN

Eyewitness Reports at Odds With Official Scenario


LEAKED MEMO PROVES BUSH LIED ON IRAQ

Memo clearly shows President Bush â??doctoredâ?� intelligence

and it goes on and on and on......

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/about_us.html

heh, all I need to look at. And you say IIII use a lot of assumptions and bullshit. That site just regurgitates male cow pie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yocass

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/about_us.html

heh, all I need to look at. And you say IIII use a lot of assumptions and bullshit. That site just regurgitates male cow pie.

---

i bet yocass looks exactly like his avatar and thats why he's so angry

...considering my picture is on this site, that was pretty stupid. I really have to stop expecting intelligent responses from you. Leave that to pisshead, at least he makes an intelligible point, whether or not I think hes right. You just say random nonsense.