Definitely disconcerting...I hope some other anomaly occurred because having Quick Fix become irrelevant would be absolutely insane, and definitely not insane in a good way...Quote:
Originally Posted by esh147
Printable View
Definitely disconcerting...I hope some other anomaly occurred because having Quick Fix become irrelevant would be absolutely insane, and definitely not insane in a good way...Quote:
Originally Posted by esh147
I'm not trying to scare you guys, if this is your only hope then go in and be confident and don't give anything away because it obviously has worked for other people, I'm just saying if you have time to get clean don't risk it. When I went in I was nervous, but forced myself to act natural and to talk w the lady. I joked w her and even made her laugh when I asked if I could wash up while she was writing shit down, and she said no and handed me the pen to sign, I said damn you guys must go thru a lot of pens cause I know your not handling that thing after I just pissed. Like I said, mine couldn't have gone better, and when I walked out I thought I killed it and slept like a baby because of what my friends had told me and what I had read. I wasn't afraid at all until my boss called me the next day way before I was supposed to show up (I worked graveyard so I knew it couldn't be good).
My urine doesn't foam. Unless its the first sample of the morning, it doesn't smell either. If I take my multivitamin in the morning, it has a bright yellow color.Quote:
Originally Posted by esh147
Now to go google "uric acid"
Quote:
Verbatim the report says: Specimen is invalid due to abnormal physical characteristics: NO URIC ACID (thats a big one), no odor (smell your quick fix), no foaming and bright yellow color.
I, for one, will be looking forward to seeing this.Quote:
Tomorrow I will hook up my scanner and scan my paperwork so you guys can see it for yourselves.
So my scanner was being a little bitch so I just took a couple pictures and uploaded those. Here you go.....
http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/...hoto/UA002.jpg
http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/...hoto/UA001.jpg
Wow that's bad. Glad I diluted... :wtf:
Would be good to get someones opinion on this like FBR or KW...
Hi all. I have been visiting this post for quite some time now as a passing visitor and am nothing less then appreciative of the information that's been posted here, specifically on subbing with Quick Fix.
Last year in August I subbed using Quick Fix 4.2 and it worked like a charm.
I am a very well endowed female and I hid the bottle under my breast.
I practiced, practiced, practiced to make sure I got it right and most obviously I did.
I'm switching jobs again and am facing yet another uncomfortable pre-employment screening with physical at a place called concentra.
I'm EXTREMELY concerned with this thread as I fully intended on subbing again with Quick Fix.
I looked over the pics that were supplied and the very first thing that stood out to me was the fact that it is listed as a 3-panel drug screen but when you look at the results it shows that it is a 5 panel. That in itself is a huge discrenpency. I have NEVER gone to a facility that on paper states it is a 3 panel but results it as a 5 panel. Seems pretty weird to me.
As I am facing my own test next week I could really use some reassurance from you long timers on the validity of this claim and the paper work submitted for our viewing purposes. Has anyone ever gone to the same place this person went to? Has anyone ever been busted at concentra? I really need some reassurance here that subbing will work again.
SMOKE ON I SAY!! :)
When I first saw this post from esh147, I really suspected s/he was trying to scare people ... but the photo of the results are problematic.
I also checked the site for this lab at Bio Med Testing
and it does look like they are on a mission (at least their own mission) to try to identify substituted synthetic urine.
At
:: Bio-Med Testing Inc :: web site says:
Adulteration/Substitutions
There appears to be an increase in adulteration products, which are commercially purchased products brought in to add to a urine sample like Urine-Aid, Urine-Luck, Turboclean, and Klear in the hopes that the donor can pass the test. Laboratories monitor specimens to show if it contains an adulterating substance or if it is a sample that is not consistent with human urine. If these are found, no drug test is conducted it is automatically considered a "refusal to test."
Wow - that is scary.
For my test from last week with quick fix, I am still thinking all went well as there is still no phone call today telling me I failed the pre-employment screening and not to show up Monday as last instructed. but I am thinking if I ever need to do this again, may be time to find someone who doesn't smoke weed (or do anything else).
But my quick fix wasn't bright yellow like the one from esh147
What's that about?
Right...the website says it's considered a "refusal to test".
With that said, one would think the paperwork would say that same verbiage, right?
another website says that some testing parameters are ph tests (which based on the below description would seem to address the issue of uric acid, though I thought from review of the quick fix synthetic urine that proper ph was present in quick fix):
see e.g.
section on Urine Specimen Validity (Adulteration)Test
at
Urine Sample Adulteration Test
pH tests for the presence of acidic or alkaline adulterants in urine. Normal pH levels should be in the range of 4.0 to 9.0. Values outside of this range may indicate the sample has been altered.