US sets nuclear deadline for Iran

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaBudhaStank

Dude. Fuck it. That's it. I say, GIVE them nuclear weapons. Shit man, if the bomb's gonna drop let's just get this over with. I'm tired of all this stupid fucking talk. I don't give a fuck what Iran wants to do. They want nukes? Go nuts. They wanna start launching them at the west? Feel free. I honestly don't care all that much. Nuclear Holocaust is inevevitable, and if you think otherwise you're really not that smart. You don't create the world's most destructive weapon and watch as half the civilized world builds thousands of them, and NOT expect shit to backfire sooner or later.

The only thing that has a better chance of wiping out humanity is a meteor or asteroid, because we can't stop them and they can drop out of the sky at any given moment.

I bet Jesus would have a fuckin' field day with this. "Those who live by the sword..."

---

Well damn, sure "1/2 the civilized world has their hands on nuclear weapons" but why the fuck ask for that now? you would rather this shit happen soon than in a few hundred years? Give them nukes? you say that asteroids and meteorites* would kill off the human race because we cant stop them? Well let them kill us off not shit we can stop!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apocolips31

That is why having nukes in the hands of only a few countries has worked this long? That is like giving out a ak-47 to every person in the world and asking them not to fire it. You think someone wouldn't go shoot it? Letting more countries have nukes would just increase the chance that it could fall into the wrong hands or be used without a good cause.

---

lol that's part of what im saying!


im not saying just give them all nukes, but i AM saying that they are going to start trying harder and harder to get their own.


it's like when kids go to school and one kid has a brand new toy, all the kids go running home begging their parents to buy them one too.

Yeah the Nukes/Toys analogy is pretty crappy.

When they try harder to attempt to get nukes then we try just as hard to stop them.
They push we push.

And it's not just the United states who want this deadline. Our allies do too. It's not like the U.S. is going off alone all power hungry and shit. Were trying to do the world some good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fenderninja

Well damn, sure "1/2 the civilized world has their hands on nuclear weapons" but why the fuck ask for that now? you would rather this shit happen soon than in a few hundred years? Give them nukes? you say that asteroids and meteorites* would kill off the human race because we cant stop them? Well let them kill us off not shit we can stop!

---

But see that's the point, you think we CAN stop them, or anyone for that matter, from doing it. If a country wants nukes bad enough, they're gonna get them, one way or another. The only way to REALLY stop Iran from actually getting nukes is A) annihilate them, entirely, not a soul left in the country, or B) invade and occupy for the next 100 years or so until all resistance is stamped out. Then watch as it comes back within 5 years and a new government is set up, in which they hate us and everyone else even more because we fucked them up.

It's a lose-lose situation. I'd thought that was obvious from the start. There's no such thing as a positive end to a war or anything of the sort. Oh, sure, you might destroy your enemies. You might even get peace for 10 or 20 years. Until it starts alllllllllllll over again and you're back to square one.

Talk about a pesimistic.

There are plenty of other options. Sanctions work. Especially EXTREME sanctions. And invading for 100 years and total anhiliation are ridiculus. Talk about extremes here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rebgirl420

Sir I doubt YOUR intelligence with a rash statement such as this. So just because you feel such a thing is unavoidable we should encourage the destruction of 90 percent of society? I'm sure most of the world would like to keep the "invetable" from happening. For the sake of children and adults alike.

---

Yes, I WOULD rather it happen now, because it IS inevitable. I would spare the lives of the future for the destruction of the present in a heartbeat. Maybe the remaining 10% will have a shred of common sense in their skulls. In fact, I think it might be NECESSARY that we destroy most of ourselves, in order to give the future the possibility of a hope, unlike living in fear and hatred like the majority of humans do. Yes, we may destroy 90% of the population. So what? Why are we so special? Because we're alive right now? What did we do that's so great that we deserve to continue our tragic, terrible and absolutely leech-like existence? Nothing that hasn't had the scales thrown waaaaaay backwards by our stupidity. Implementing fission to create nuclear weapons? Easily the stupidest, most self-destructive idea the human race has ever conceived of. Thank you Albert Einstein, without you and your letter, we may have continued to thrive for another 1000 years.

Are you going to remove every person in the world who doesn't like us and has nuclear capabilities? Of course not, it can't be done. While nuclear technology exists, it is the single greatest threat to humanity. The only way to avoid nuclear holocaust is to destroy all nuclear weapons the world over and anything that remotely resembles nuclear technology, or destroy the human race. Unless either one of those happens, I hope you enjoy seeing mushroom clouds on the horizon. It doesn't matter who has nukes and who doesn't, we were doomed from the start. Man's greatest creation is our greatest undoing, and we did it with a smile and a cheer because our enemies fell in droves before us. We became unstoppable; for a few years anyway. It doesn't matter who shoots first, just who shoots last.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rebgirl420

Talk about a pesimistic.

There are plenty of other options. Sanctions work. Especially EXTREME sanctions. And invading for 100 years and total anhiliation are ridiculus. Talk about extremes here.

---

Oh yes, sanctions have been working just dandily.

Because thats why we're still trying to disarm them and have been for years, right? No, my dear, extremes are the only way for true results. Everything else is just a roadblock to the inevitable.

"What did we do that's so great that we deserve to continue our tragic, terrible and absolutely leech-like existence?" - DaBudhaStank

Are you freaking crazy? Do you hear yourself?

Maybe YOUR a Leech off society and the world but I am not. And neither are most of society. Sacrifice yourslef. Leave everyone else out your crazy "Oh woe is me and the world / Some people are bad so everyone should suffer" rant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rebgirl420

Yeah the Nukes/Toys analogy is pretty crappy.

When they try harder to attempt to get nukes then we try just as hard to stop them.
They push we push.

And it's not just the United states who want this deadline. Our allies do too. It's not like the U.S. is going off alone all power hungry and shit. Were trying to do the world some good.

---

eventually it will get out of hand. that is my only point.


what then?

What then? Like if they DO somehow aquire nukes?

Depends on the situation. If they are extremely hostile we might have to strike.