you cant get cancer from cannabis but smoking too many rolling papers or leaves from blunts is not as good for you.
Printable View
you cant get cancer from cannabis but smoking too many rolling papers or leaves from blunts is not as good for you.
You read me wrong, I said burning hash, not vaporizing it, causes obvious combustion and therefore is quite different than vaporizing, which was your initial question (you asked BURNING hash vs VAPING). REGARDLESS of how pure the hash is, you are still setting it on fire and breathing in the results, which is less healthy than only breathing in the vapors generated without ignitionQuote:
Originally Posted by prairieplantsystems
And for those of you who honestly believe there are no carcinogens created when you burn a carbon-based plant, you very clearly don't know enough about the chemical formula of plant combustion to continue offering your opinion. Yes cannabis has cancer-fighting properties, but if you think that means there aren't carcinogens that come with it, you need to do a little more reading (btw, if i sound rude i dont mean to be, just havent smoked in way too fucking long)
Lite dat sheeeeit up fool :rastasmoke: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by otottoto
Great Edwards' quote in your signature by the way. Such a same nice guys like that can't compete with all the corrupt (but VERY wealthy) politicians that always seem to get so much attention...
peace
I'm not sure either Obama or Clinton are corrupt.
They're definitely less populist than Edwards which leads to all sorts of issues involving potential special interest groups but I'm kinda glad this goaround, everyone seems to be on the up and up (at least on the left side)