[Check out 911truth.org if you want to know more. For a great laugh check out bushorchimps.com
Printable View
[Check out 911truth.org if you want to know more. For a great laugh check out bushorchimps.com
[B]It blew me away
Some posts are not worthy of debate , open-minded liberals,sometimes have their minds firmly closed to debate,truth or facts..I ain't got enough time to do battle with all the hate-filled liberals. I can only sit at the computer for a couple hours,before I have to lay down on my side and relieve the pain in my back.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nullific
Have a good one...Torog
That's precisely what it means. Luckily the rest of us can rely on the other half for reassurance. Much respect to every American on this thread that speaks out against Bush.Quote:
Originally Posted by mr chinnery
sometimes i wished i would follow my own advice and ignore people but curiousity has you read a thread and you see some shit that makes ya want to just beat some idiot over the head like a caveman,become uncivilized in a blink of the eye when you meet a barbarian ya better be a bad ass is my take on it.Quote:
Originally Posted by braindead
man your name says it all for you"braindead'
"but america deserved 9-11 anyway"
wtf is that to say ?
man your so low i cant even put a name on it but i'm sure no one gives a fuck what you have to say anyway
in that logic
you deserve to be the first person to contract the newest desease to plague mankind,
hope your gonads swell up the size of ya empty head,
:eek:
now back to my jiont
How can you say that "open-minded liberals have their minds firmly closed to debate" when a previous post stated "if ya want to argue or debate..I'm up for it."?Quote:
Some posts are not worthy of debate , open-minded liberals,sometimes have their minds firmly closed to debate,truth or facts..I ain't got enough time to do battle with all the hate-filled liberals.
How can you ignore others opinions and instead of give your own constructive criticism simply say that they are bastard liberals and not worth it?
Again who is refusing to argu here, the stereotypical conservative, or the stereotypical liberal?
Howdy Nullific,Quote:
Originally Posted by Nullific
I suppose that I should have said that I don't have the time to debate with young,hate-filled liberals,who don't really want to debate-but instead,hurl insults and profanity..just for the thrill of seeing it on the screen. At least you can spell good enough to understand you and you seem to have more than a couple brain cells,to rub together..also,young liberals,have little life experience and tend to follow and spout,whatever the current liberal mantra is,without question.
Groups like ANSWER and MOVEON,are filled with proffessional socialist and communist propagandists,and young liberals don't stand a chance,against that level of indoctrination.
What say you ?
Have a good one...Torog
All I can say is that Bush got over 51% of the vote. Do you know how long it has been since a President had done that? What about Clinto should he be killed too? He was the in more wars than Bush. That doesn't matter though does it? And by they way I hate to be the one to infrom some of you that wmds were found. I don't see how you can say they were not. You could say stock piles were not found that would be true. He did have enuf time to move them befor being invaded. So if your going to say that Bush should be killed than so should Clinton and about every other President. The liberal press did not dring all of his wars to your attention though, so it must not matter. Cause its to hard to do research. It is to bad that a cold fact of war is innocent death, but it is. Just one last note you dont need to attack someone personally just because they differ from your opion, and name calling come on grow up. Be a little more open minded and bigger than that.
[QUOTE=psychocat]Religion is elitism.[/QUote
Hows that???????????
You can't just label everybody that disagrees with you a liberal and then say that all liberals do is hurl insults. What 'insults' have been 'hurled' by the 'young liberals' on this thread? Of course you'll get some pricks from both sides of the argument who only know how to defend their point of view with namecalling. You have no idea what the political views/age/religion/sexual preference anybody else on this board has and cannot very well call them all young bastard liberals.Quote:
I suppose that I should have said that I don't have the time to debate with young,hate-filled liberals,who don't really want to debate-but instead,hurl insults and profanity..just for the thrill of seeing it on the screen. At least you can spell good enough to understand you and you seem to have more than a couple brain cells,to rub together..also,young liberals,have little life experience and tend to follow and spout,whatever the current liberal mantra is,without question.
You make some interesting claims. First i'll say that neither the rebuplicans or democrats are very good at running the country, the way I see it they're both corrupt and a democracy where people vote between only two parties is complete bullshit.Quote:
All I can say is that Bush got over 51% of the vote. Do you know how long it has been since a President had done that? What about Clinto should he be killed too? He was the in more wars than Bush. That doesn't matter though does it? And by they way I hate to be the one to infrom some of you that wmds were found. I don't see how you can say they were not. You could say stock piles were not found that would be true. He did have enuf time to move them befor being invaded. So if your going to say that Bush should be killed than so should Clinton and about every other President. The liberal press did not dring all of his wars to your attention though, so it must not matter. Cause its to hard to do research. It is to bad that a cold fact of war is innocent death, but it is. Just one last note you dont need to attack someone personally just because they differ from your opion, and name calling come on grow up. Be a little more open minded and bigger than that.
You say they found weapons of mass destruction: do you have any sources to back this up?
I have been able to find plenty stating otherwise.
Lack of weapons of mass destruction comes back to haunt Bush
No WMDs in Iraq
Election was rigged and stolen
Liberal media?
The US has a liberal media
It's the media, stupid!
The myth of the liberal media
Religion could be considered elitism, because, if you havn't noticed religious people often tend to think that their beliefs are correct and above those of others. Christian have also made the claim that they're religion and god was one and true, and being the majority in a free country such as america they think that acknowledgement of their god should be seen in school, court houses, inauguration prayers etc.