i put a post about this an barley got any replies but now since an older member that everyone knows and likes posts this its gets over 40 replies wtf is that shit
Printable View
i put a post about this an barley got any replies but now since an older member that everyone knows and likes posts this its gets over 40 replies wtf is that shit
that is so wrong, it makes pot smokers in general look bad
MJ's illegality makes stupid people beeing on it.
It's completely wrong. Just because this is the lifestyle people on these boards choose it's not for everyone. These kids aren't old enough to decide what's right for them and until they can they should be steered in the most conservative path possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebgirl420
LMAO!!!!
Not really mate, molesting a child is far far worse and sickening.Quote:
Originally Posted by crudemood
Wow, way to have your priorities in order...Quote:
Originally Posted by hisbiggness36
~~~~~~
This is absolutely disgusting. In addition to the fact that it is just wrong to be offering drugs of any sort to young children, they are also much more susceptible to the damages from inhaling smoke, and they are much more likely to get some sort of respiratory issue that wasn't their choice at all.
Ugh.
Lets keep the politics bullshit out of this. Fact is two losers got a couple of babies high.
Have a good one!:jointsmile:
And people wonder HOW THE HELL weed can still be illegal..........UNREAL!:wtf:
Have a good one!:jointsmile:
Sorry Oneironaut.......I deleted off that b.s. rant once already that you quoted.
Have a good one!:jointsmile:
Oh all right, good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
I'll make my other point again then.
These people did do something very irresponsible and they should probably be punished for it, but it's not the worst thing in the world. Every day lots of parents give their babies alcohol to get them to stop crying, but how often do you hear about that in the media? Never, because people don't care about alcohol. It wouldn't make it off the cutting room floor, even though alcohol is probably a lot worse for a baby than a little weed smoke.
My parents occasionally smoked weed around me when I was a baby, and presumably I got a contact buzz sometimes, but I grew up just fine. It's not going to kill the kid and shouldn't cause any major damage if it's not overdone, but still it's stupid to give a two- or five-year-old any kind of intoxicating drug.
But this brings up an interesting question. At what age does it cross that fuzzy boundary between an absolutely irresponsible act and a somewhat questionable act? And when does it turn from a somewhat questionable act into a fully acceptable act?
Those teens are African American, I HIGHLY DOUBT they where hippies, or what ever group of people you are trying to blame, I'd guess they listen to rap and such, and so do me and my friends, but we would never try something like that, plus who the hells wants to waste well paid smoke..Quote:
Originally Posted by rebgirl420
they are complete and utter wankers
no point in it at all
i dont pressure people, i admit i offer it to some people
but never pressurise people, thats just wrong
I lol'd at his response to the question at the end of the tape. ;D
EXACTLY. I WAS TELLING HIM TO KEEP POLITICS OUT OF IT. THATS THE EXACT POINT OF MY BS RANT, , BUT YOU MAKE IT APPARENT WHOSE TEAM YOU ARE ON BY DELETING MY POST.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
EXACTLY
I'm not on anyones "team" but if your referring to my political views you should check out the politics forum. The lounge isn't for politics or b.s. slams against fellow members in here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diary of a Madman
Have a good one!:jointsmile:
Obviously some people who expressed opinions in this thread weren't raised the same way I was. There is no 'fuzzy' line where things go from OK to not ok. Its a very obvious line to be stepped over.
I would be embarassed to say that smoking out kids who are under 18 is responsible, because it is not.
Maybe some of yall were raised with coke in your bottle and drugs around your home, but I wasn't and can obviously tell (from a mile away) what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior. If you can't tell, slap your parents because they didn't do their job.
Seriously. I can't see a fuzzy line where it is now okay to allow, and even encourage, a toddler to smoke.Quote:
Originally Posted by ValkyrieAg
Adults have the responsibility of protecting children, as the clip says, and part of protecting children is shielding them from things that could be harmful to them, especially at such young ages. I am not ragging on parents who smoke around children, but there is a huge difference between parents smoking around a toddler and those same parents sticking a blunt in the toddler's mouth and encouraging him to inhale.
I know it wasn't the children's parents, but family members, and adults in general, have a responsibility to children.
words cant describe how pathetic and inhumane those two teens are....those little kids are still 3 years too young to be smoking pot :) .
but seriously, it is fucking sick, and shit like that brings the pothead community down.
Of course there's a fuzzy line. It is clearly not okay to smoke up a toddler, but it is okay to smoke up a 50-year-old. Somewhere in between the person in question matures to the point where they can handle it. It is not a single moment in time, but a gradual process.Quote:
Originally Posted by ValkyrieAg
Are you seriously suggesting that there is a huge ethical difference between offering a joint to somebody who is 17 years and 364 days old and offering somebody a joint on their 18th birthday? I don't think it's that clear-cut.
WTF? I never said there was a fuzzy line in respect to toddlers. I said there is a fuzzy line in respect to the age at which immature children become adults mature enough to smoke pot. There is not a single moment in someone's life when they magically become mature, and that fact has very serious implications for how our society ought to react to pot smoking among young people.Quote:
Originally Posted by vileoxidation
That is fucked i would never encourage a little kid to smoke bud....anyway this story was probley made up by the news to make us look more like the axe murdering family killing virgin deflowering monsters we are.
i hate the media.
Oneironaut, the way I see it is:
18+ should be the legal age to smoke Weed legally (if it was legal).
16+ at the moment is the legal age too smoke a cigarette in the UK, soon too be 18+.
Anyone younger than 15 smoking weed in my eyes is considered irresponsible. I often think of those 2 years between 16 and 18 experimental. I found this is when you really start to form your true self, and try new things. It wouldn't justify smoking under age but it would call for leniency. Then, when you're 18 I feel you're big enough and ugly enough too look after yourself, so it's up to you what you do from there onwards. I'm sure plenty of people here will disagree with my view, but that's the way I see it.
Well, even if we accept some kind of age limit on the consumption of cannabis, say 18 years old, I think we ought to make a distinction between how we treat somebody who gives weed to a 17 year old and someone who gives weed to a 2 year old.
Well I'd say someone who gave weed to a 16 year old is liable to get in trouble but with some leniency. But 15 below they should get full punishment. A similar structure to the way they prosecute a pedophile. Not, the same punishment. Just so there's no misunderstandings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
Okay, lets think about the definition of fuzzy for a minute...Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
The distinction between a toddler and a 50-year-old, as you used in your post, smoking - NOT fuzzy (and if it is, then your just stupid)
The distinction between a 17-year-old and an 18-year-old smoking - fuzzy.
But you said that this issue brought up the important point of where do we draw that fuzzy line. I mean, that is a good issue to discuss, but when you say it in the context of the rest of your post, it seemed as though you were saying "Well, this is a close call, and the its really close to the point where there is a fuzzy line of distinction."
you dont know what you are talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by NextLineIsMine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samwhore
That isn't really the point here, The point is two grown 17 year old teenagers that know right from wrong, exploited a couple childern that didn't know any better. They where influenced by an adult in there eyes. A child's brain isnt ready for a psychedelic drug..
We're looking at 20 years to life...
Well said.Quote:
Originally Posted by LazySmoking420
they're gonna stereotype us as being stoned irresponsible potheads...I know we are when we're high, but nothing that calice.
allow it
He meant to say that you watch Fox News because you're a stoner and not the other way around. Fox news believes that Steve Irwin, the Crocodile Hunter was murdered at his villa on Port au Batois...A bunch of slapsticks at Fox News.Quote:
Originally Posted by rebgirl420
My point exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by vileoxidation
I'm small-minded. I listen to Pink Floyd and given the appropriate situation, I would probably chuckle at the word "roni." But I would never forcibly get anyone high, nor would I transfer smoke into an undeveloped child's lungs. Sorry. I guess I felt like your post was judging me. My own degenerateness doesn't need any extra help...Quote:
Originally Posted by rebgirl420
dude in heaven you wouldnt need a joint we wouldnt breathe air it would be ganja smoke, look at Jesus hes a hippie, in the old testament God was viscious, in the new testament God turned all peacefull, its because Jesus got high and was like "Dad, dude, chill man. No need for all that. Hit this and go with it". So the big man chonged out and was like "Man ive done some pretty messed up stuff. My bad".:hippy:Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake2389