-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
use distilled water. i smoked with it, and it smoked smoother. i think this is the cause for all these contradictions between logical scientific proof (that THC is not h2o soluble) and experience (a joint or blunt gets you fucked up). tap water, which most of use use is full of flouride, vitamins, all kinda of shit. distilled water is pure H2O, meaning it will be better able to remove tar and stuff from the smoke. I smoked one bowl outta my double bubbler with distilled water last night and then watched a movie, fucked out of my mind. i was also high for a lot longer time
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
If it's 3%, then your experiment will be 97% worthless, because 97% of the experience will probably be the same, seeing as 97% of the stuff is water
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transition Force
If it's 3%, then your experiment will be 97% worthless, because 97% of the experience will probably be the same, seeing as 97% of the stuff is water
Not if the 3% cleans out 99% of what was there before.
Confusinggggg. :confused:
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
i belive, a bottle of that stuff, in it purest buyable form is posiness if swallowed.it makes a good mouth wash when you have cavatys if you dont swallo the crap, and also, i think it maybe a bit flameable
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
and the reason (methinks) for him getting extremely fucked up, is...
"because oxeygen gets you high" brad pitt, fight club
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Where is there oxygen?
Guys, H2O2 and H2O and O2 are two entirely different compounds. Just because it has a molecule of oxygen doesn't make it oxygen.
You have no device that can test how much is actually being filtered, and you have no idea why the hit would burn more than usual, because there are hundreds of other variables. Just because it burned doesn't make you right, and it doesn't make you wrong either because you're going about the process the entirely wrong way.
Third, why?. Even if it is cold, the difference in filtering has nothing to do with the freezing temperature, it has to do with the difference in temperatures between the two mediums.
Which brings me to my last point. 3% hydrogen peroxide can cause nausea, vomiting, or burning. 3% hydrogen peroxide would probably freeze around the same point as water, seeing as how they're freezing points aren't that differently. Of course, there's no way to tell without experimentation.
Graph, the voice of reason. The voice of reason that nobody wanted.
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Can somebody explain this to me: cold water will cool the smoke, but somehow it filters less tar and shit than warm water?
I did well in science, so don't spare me the technical shit.
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
well, it is utterly disgusting.
no offense moorephened, but I think you should focus your energy on different projects than this one.
it does burn the throat and the inside of the frontal lobe, i kid you not.
i took half a rip and had to stop because it just felt too sketchy.
good idea though, always fun trying new things! :thumbsup:
come up with something else, and i'll test it for ya, at a decent price too!
:rasta:
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by couch-potato
Can somebody explain this to me: cold water will cool the smoke, but somehow it filters less tar and shit than warm water?
I did well in science, so don't spare me the technical shit.
exactly what i was wondering
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
i use hydrogen peroxide as mouthwash
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
ok, instead of taking the risk of hydrogen peroxide in your bong, hasnt anyone thought of buying a bong with ice nubs in it. you can fill the bottom with warm water, and put ice in the top. thus filtration, and a cool hit.
let me know if my logic is wrong
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
couldnt you just use hot water, and get an ice catcher? i dont mind that much if theres a bong in front of me ill hit it, i dont care what temp the water is haha :thumbsup:
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
tried it. choked the same. no difference in high. i'll stick to water and zinfandel.
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
and one more thing.....wouldnt cold water filter better? as the molecules are closer together?
and if you got a cheap plastic bong, and got shwagg, try using that ice cone flavouring!
you can get it at any walmart, cool little experiment
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
I am prepared to reach my conclusions. The experiment is now over.
The hypothetical Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) solution to the bongfluid quandary is deemed unsuccessful if not inimical.
Subjects reported headaches, burning sensations, and unease. Only one subject reported an increase in intoxication.
Conclusion: FAILURE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notes:
I would like to thank everybody who posted on this thread. I am not an expert at these matters and I value your input.
I would like to give a greater thank you to those of you who took part in the experiment. It takes courage to try out the ideas that originated from a slightly toasted man at 10:00 pm but it is that courage which advances stoner science, indeed all science for the betterment of mankind.
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny Beanstalk
ok, instead of taking the risk of hydrogen peroxide in your bong, hasnt anyone thought of buying a bong with ice nubs in it. you can fill the bottom with warm water, and put ice in the top. thus filtration, and a cool hit.
let me know if my logic is wrong
Uh yep. If ya read the first page, I believe you'd see that this was already covered. By me. I like my bongs iced thank you.:)
I can't believe some of you guys tried the hp like that. How do you feel today?
geez. I hope yer all ok.:(
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorephened
I am prepared to reach my conclusions. The experiment is now over.
The hypothetical Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) solution to the bongfluid quandary is deemed unsuccessful if not inimical.
Subjects reported headaches, burning sensations, and unease. Only one subject reported an increase in intoxication.
Conclusion: FAILURE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notes:
I would like to thank everybody who posted on this thread. I am not an expert at these matters and I value your input.
I would like to give a greater thank you to those of you who took part in the experiment. It takes courage to try out the ideas that originated from a slightly toasted man at 10:00 pm but it is that courage which advances stoner science, indeed all science for the betterment of mankind.
Aww. It was a good try!
Maybe try it with hawaiian punch and everclear once. :)
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by tootsie roll
Aww. It was a good try!
No reason to feel bad. It is the nature of experiment to fail and learn from your mistakes.
The irony of this is that the experiment is outdated. The bong has been surpassed by the vaporizer as the method is inhaling the purest smoke.
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan87
okay guys, to solve your problem of arguing...i tryed it...it fucked me up so much more, i think it killed brain cells or somthing cuz i havent felt right in like 7 hours...it gave me a headache. its really strong shit and when i sucked i could feel it kinda burning my lips from bubble splatters. guys try it if you want to get really fucked up, but its kinda painful, and not natural, and natural is what its all about when smoking the sweet sweet cheeba.
dude, u fuckin' rule...
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamingskullballs
and one more thing.....wouldnt cold water filter better? as the molecules are closer together?
and if you got a cheap plastic bong, and got shwagg, try using that ice cone flavouring!
you can get it at any walmart, cool little experiment
Contrary... if the water molecules are closer together, it leaves little room for other molecules to pass thru them. :D
Ice does not cause you to smoke more tar and chemicals, ice cold water will tho.
Using warm water and ice is really the best way although i heard smoking with ice slowly fills your lungs with water... (very slowly)
As for this H2O2... im not sure as organic chem was a few semesters ago, but im pretty sure peroxides generate free oxygen radicals, which are very bad for any living tissue....
i feel bad for any1 who tried this.
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
i dont know about this hydrone proxidide..haha i like to keep it just water in my bongo.
but ive noticed that when i filled my phx up with super cold water (brita water) and ice cubes...its pretty smooth and frankly i think it kinda makes people drool more on the pull of the hit.
but putting hot water in it (and the ashcatcher) i think you get a much smoother hit. so while youd think cold water and ice would be bomb...hot water is so much better. plus no drooling...
take that for what you will...
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
ha...lol i like how the person who thought of this whole thing never tried it...real scientists test their own hypothosis...
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorephened
This could be a great moment in stoner science.
Problem:
Many stoners use bongs to filter and cool their smoke with water. The problem is that the conditions to do those things are polar opposites.
One can use cold water to better cool their smoke, but they give up the ability to filter out harmful toxins. Alternatively, they can use room temperature or heated water to increase filtration but they must sacrifice a smooth hit.
Hypothetical solution:
Replacing bong water with Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).
Hydrogen peroxide is sold at all drug and grocery stores diluted at 3-5% as an antiseptic, mouthwash, and hair bleach. It costs a few dollars USD.
Since Hydrogen peroxide is more reactive than water my theory is that even super cooled (it has a very low freeze-point) it would still filter out a majority of toxins.
Iā??m dying to test out my hypothesis but I donā??t have access to a bong right now.
So here is your mission:
Go out and get some Hydrogen peroxide and use it to filter your smoke and then tell me about it. I want to hear about its use at room temp. and after itā??s been in the freezer.
Do it for me, do it for yourselves, do it for SCIENCE!!!
These harmful "toxins" have never ever caused a death in the history of history. So what's the big deal?
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Arrrghhh i tried the hydrogen peroxide test and.......................my hair feel out and i have an albeano blonde tongue..........Thanks
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
alcohol absorbs a neglible amount in the few seconds your smoke travels through it. Go ahead and just cool that below freezing for a really chilled hit.
It takes like a month to make a green dragon tincture for comparison
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamingskullballs
and one more thing.....wouldnt cold water filter better?
No. It has nothing to do with how close the molecules are, it is simply that things dissolve easier in a warm solvent than a cold one. But the affect would be minor, a far better way would be to a really tall bong, or one which forms really small bubbles.
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
why not just get a double barrel bong, put really hot water in the first chamber, freezing water in the second?
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
H2O2 is a Cytotoxin. That means it kills cells. This explains the "burning" and other effects. For those of you who inhaled, you have set up the first steps in developing emphysema, a serious lung disease. The only way to reverse those first steps is to stop smoking anything immediately! Depending on the dosage, and here I'm assuming you only took one small hit from the bong, anywhere from a week to a month of abstinence should be enough.
Please, if in the future you have an idea, check it out first! Even my simple search of the web turned up this information.
--
Magus1011
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by magus1011
H2O2 is a Cytotoxin. That means it kills cells. This explains the "burning" and other effects. For those of you who inhaled, you have set up the first steps in developing emphysema, a serious lung disease. The only way to reverse those first steps is to stop smoking anything immediately! Depending on the dosage, and here I'm assuming you only took one small hit from the bong, anywhere from a week to a month of abstinence should be enough.
Please, if in the future you have an idea, check it out first! Even my simple search of the web turned up this information.
--
Magus1011
i knew it was bad!
holy shit im glad i didnt try this...:D
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Heya moorephened.... this seems a little.. outplaced... Why didnt you do it.. after all .. it was YOUR idea..???.. but sadly.. i tried it.. tasted like piss... and didnt really change to much about the high..
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
ok fuck it you get some mak a home made bong -.- there nt hard and then let us know :) ps ive only read the first page well 2 stoned to read the others so soz if this has already bn done or suggested :)
-
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
I only read the first page too,pour that shit on a cut and watch the sience experiment start,,,LOLz,,,Peroxide...