Quote:
Originally Posted by God v2.0
-True that.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by God v2.0
-True that.
I've met people with the same attitude as you. Thre one I see a few times a year is my step-brother: He's such an ass-hole. I know no one cares but I'll tell a short story. Last Christmas, "Santa" got my dad a table tennis table. I ask my brother if he needs help setting it up. He says no. I hear Kenny G. on the radio and my annoying ass sister talking with my retarded stepmom. I hate who I'm surrounded by and I hate Kenny G. so I go to the PC room and browse around on an online music store for a while (there's no tv). I come out to find that the table has been set up and some of my relatives have been playing for a while, so I try to join in, but my step-brother starts to lecture me because I was on the PC instead of socializing. I'm not going to get into it, but I get pissed and go back inside. Half-hour later I go back out and chill on a lawn-chair and converse with my stepmom. I mention someone who was interviewed on the Daily Show and he immediately starts an argument with me about how CC is filth and anyone who has ever been a part of it (even though O'reilly and other people he looks up to has been interviewed) is filth. I get pissed and go back inside. If no one has read my entire post, just read what's in bold.Quote:
Originally Posted by God v2.0
The moral of this story is that people play with electronics instead of socialize because they hate being lectured by better-than-though assholes, putting up with shitty music and retarded people. You are an intolerant asshole who only sees one side on this issue. Video games may be a waste of time, but talking to people like you is no more worthwhile.
Hmmm... I've seen a phrase going around that I think would describe what this paragraph did quite effectively:Quote:
Originally Posted by eddievanzant
PWNED YOUR ASS God v2.0
Did I use it correctly? :)
Technically, that is perfectly correct; however, I prefer the more insightful...
God v2.0, you have been thoroughly owned (with a p). I feel honored to know that someone considers my statement worthy of pwnage.
the 360 owns the ps3. look into it, even ps3 developers are saying that sony can't hope to hold there own agaisnt microsoft.
Congrats man, the 360 rocks the casbah, fight night is the shit, call of duty online is amazing, battlefront looks to be the best game ever made. Dead or Alive 4 is the shit. the 360 rocks, enjoy ~!
Really. I'd love if you could list some sources, on that. I cant seem to find anything :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by higher4hockey
I request you prove this with linkage to an interview with a developer. Until then, LIAR!Quote:
Originally Posted by higher4hockey
Ya beat me to it!Quote:
Really. I'd love if you could list some sources, on that. I cant seem to find anything :rolleyes:
Hah, I like you :DQuote:
Originally Posted by eddievanzant
HAHAHA, The PS3 is gonna have 5x the graphics that the 360 has, that's a fact. I had the 360 and played all those games. Like I said, I sold it on e-bay 4 weeks later and made my money back and then some.. Don't be mad cause you wasted your $$$. I will bet you anything that the PS3 sells 10 times what the 360 has or will.Quote:
Originally Posted by higher4hockey
Do you mind me adding you to my buddylist? You seem to be a kickass kind of person yourself.
Not at all :)Quote:
Originally Posted by eddievanzant
Hehe, this is a great thread
Normally the latter is always compared; but seeing that many are being returned, the first quantity might be more, haha.Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
Threads about easily debatable topics like this are always quite popular. I'm off for now though, gonna go kick some ass on BF1942.
360!
ps3 will suck kack
You guys need to research it a bit before you speak. The PS3 is gonna have 5x the graphics. That means it is better. The HD in the PS3 is also much stronger. Sorry you guys wasted your $$. I bet you can still make it back.LOL.
Hehe It's almost sadQuote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
I would be pist if I had wasted my $$ on an xbox 360 and actually thought it was going to be the ultimate in gaming. My PC has more defined graphics, lol. That's how I knew from the beginning 360 was a waste of time, when ps3 comes out it's gonna rock your world like u dont know :dance:
I guess the arguement of microsoft/playstation will probably go on forever. I personally like the xbox. but hey, to each his own!
by the way: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...&start=0&num=3
"It's bad enough the PS3 is utilizing a crippled system architecture and
hardware components that videogame developers world wide both despise and
mock."
yeah well its all a matter of taste really.
if u want big name well known crowd pleasers get a ps3
if u want superior online gameplay for ur console, get a 360
and if u want something slightly different to the norm that pushes the boundaries of videogaming, get a revolution.
personally id take the last option.
bear in mind though that microsoft consoles will get better and better, due to the fact that they are so fucking rich they can release 3 consoles for every 1 of sony's, if one or 2 fail theyve still got billions to play with
Why do people get so excited saying that one is better than the other or one sucks ass? They're both good consoles. Do what u do and get whichever one u want, and don't say shit about the other one cause u prolly never played it, or are too close minded to give both a fair chance. After all, its just a video games, not politics. Holla at cha boy.
No. It's politics.
I read what the developer said. It doesn't change anything. Even if the PS3 is nothing special, it's still being released much later than the 360 and will be better. It doesn't need to live up to the hype to be the best console. PS2 was the worst console. It sold best. Xbox was the best console. It sold worst. Now, the PS3 not only has the precedence of the PS2 being the best seller, but it will also be the most capable. The 360 is seling worse than the original. Also, the person who said that one should get the 360 for online use, SONY is said to be working on an Xbox live competitor. Pete rock, refusing to debate can show two things about a person: That person is not able to argue because he isn't knowledgeable on the topic, and that that person didn't give a crap. We argue because Video Gaming is a big part of some people's lives and care about the future of it. If for nothing else, I can at least respect anyone who can make a point for the opposing side (not "Xbox kickz ballz") because they are interested in the future of this business.
Word.Quote:
Originally Posted by eddievanzant
Two years from now is when we'll honestly be able to say which one is better.
Right now we're arguing largely because we can say told ya so two years from now, lol.
i was wondering if anyone plays Burnout Revenge for Xbox? if you havnt played it, and you have an Xbox then GET IT!! this is the best game in my opinion. my online gamertag is Rofer. get it refoR
listen to what you just said...and than listen to what you said after that.Quote:
Originally Posted by hellomandude
edit: I would also like to add that GAMES is what mostly makes the system, "hardcore gamers" should know this...
I was lucky and actually got one for Christmas. And i love it. Ive only had a couple problems. After 4 days the thing broke and i had to send it in to microsoft. They sent me a new one about 6 days later at no charge. The new one kept freezing up and i had to send it in again. They sent me another new one and it has been working fine since. I have gotten great joy out of it and i think its a great system.
Hahaha. Third time's a charm!
for fuck sake, i didnt ask for everyones opinion...i definitly didnt want this to turn into an argument on which is better. I just wanted to share my joy but you assholes had to turn it into a debate. oh, and thanks for saying how shitty a system is that i jsut bought. thats exactly what i wanted to hear, now can we just lock this thread because all its turned into is a flame fest/argument.
a system that you have to send in twice in 10 days is not a good system. case closed.Quote:
Originally Posted by halo
Xbox 360 is more powerful than the PS3, and the PS3 is gona have a $900+ pricetag
baker, ignore them. wherever you may be, africa, school, the bathroom, whenever you bring up xbox/ps2, there will be someone saying that the other console is better. i would rather have a ps2, but if i had the money for a 360, i would get off my ass in a second and go and buy one! have you played c.o.d 2? i played it at my friends house on a huge hdtv, pitch black room, with surround sound and all the works, and I felt like I was in a war, haha. anyways, i bet ya most of the people bad mouthing the 360 are jealous, even if its subconsiously. gogogo good times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baker420
do not get the x box 360........they still have problems with overheating and not performing to what they say.....................in like 2 years they are supposed to re release it since mocrosoft will release something before they get dont making it just to have it out at a certain time.............................................. .www.ps3info.com
everyone talking shit on 360 jus got raped in the face. and the game developers havent even used 360's full effect yet with games, games will get better and better for the 360 as time comes.Quote:
Originally Posted by higher4hockey
it is not more powerful than the PS3. PS3 has 550 mHz, and 1.8 tFlops, and the Xbox360 has 500 mHz and 1.0 tflops, along with no HDQuote:
Originally Posted by Myth1184
no that is completely wrong, along with everything else on that site. The DS sold around a million copies, almost all of which were sold back for the PSP. It pwns the ds.Quote:
Originally Posted by that gay ass site
550mHz to 500mHz is not a big difference at all and there is an article saying 360 is better than the PS3.Quote:
Originally Posted by da haze meister
and when u say HD do u mean hard drive or high definition. if its hard drive u can buy it seperately for 360 and same with ps3 but the ps3 hard drive is gonna cost 300 dollars or more and with 360 u can get premium for jus a hundred dollars more and it comes wit a hard drive, remote, wireless controller and a headset.
and if ur saying High Def. than all 360 games are in high definition.
I thought this would help the debate out....
"The Xbox 360 CPU architecture has three times the general purpose processing power of the Cell. "
ONE for the PS3..."Cell's claimed advantage is on streaming floating point work which is done on its seven DSP processors. "
"The Xbox 360 GPU design is more flexible and it has more processing power than the PS3 GPU. Additional innovative features contribute to improved rendering performance"
"The memory system bandwidth in Xbox 360 exceeds the PS3's by five times"
"The model number which manufacturers choose to assign to their console serves as an immediate reflection of their confidence regarding the new hardware. Considering the vast amount of resources spent on deciding the XBox successor model number we can only assume that this is the case with 'XBox 360'. Why was 'XBox 2' not enough to describe the new console? Simply because the new XBox is too much hardware for such a meager number. The chart clearly reveals that Microsoft's console is '120' times more powerful in the model number specs."
heres the last pic for the model number...
And heres the link I got all the info from: here
i told u 360 owns ps3
PS3 > 360
this argument is never gonna end! oh well lol!:upsidedow