Beat the fuck out of this guy

I don't agree with beating the shit out of anyone 5 to 1, no matter what they've done. And jumping him? You could at least have warned him that it was coming. And that part about you bein so proud about smokin bowls over his shit-beat body, that made me sick. You are no better than he is. I usually have no problem with other people's morals or ethics, or lack of, at that, but this is just disgusting. Personally, I would've stuck to callin him a paedophilic cunt in public, near as many people as possible. In a lot of occassions, public shaming is just as bad, but at least you're not trying to physically cripple the bastard.

Peace

This no violence at any cost type shit is what let hitler run europe.

THEYRE TRYIN TO BUILD A PRISON. THEYRE TRYIN TO BUILD A PRISON.
THEYRE TRYIN TO BUILD A PRISON..... FOR YOU AND ME

Quote:

---

all you are doing is creating more crime and giving the human race a bad name.

---

Bullshit

Quote:

---

nothing like some good old fashioned JUSTICE

---

AGREED

Quote:

---

wow good for you, a bunch of punk ass kids feeling good cuz they ganged up on a person and beat the fuck outta him... wow you're so strong and soooo cool now.. i don't give a fuck what he did or didn't do that's just fucked up.... maybe one day the same shit will happen to you and all your little pussy ass friends and you'll know the pain you put someone else through..... oh and please tell me your christian cuz this would make it all even that much funnier how you think it's right to play god cuz of what he did.... the guy will get what he deserves anyways... it's people like you and your friends i truely despise... why didn't just one of you take him, if he's so "little"

---

This is why i dont like Slipknot fans.

Quote:

---

and by the way we stood there and smoked a couple of bowls after we beat his ass.

---

It was the right thing to do, because being severe both by causing pain and humiliating him you are making him more scared, and he will reconsider being an asshole twice.

Quote:

---

Dude i don't agree with what that peadophile did but you are no better than him now. I realllly don't agree with violence either. Do you seriously think that this will solve your problems?? You could have just had some harsh words with him and let him know to stay the fuck away from your sister or you'll beat the shit out of him to try and scare him off.

---

What is WRONG with you? This is exactly one of those cases. There is no way he is sinking down to his level by doing the right thing. If someone hit me in the face and i hit someone else in the face, THEN i would sink to his level, not when i return the favor. If using force is so "wrong", then i think forcing him to be in jail is very very wrong as well, and we should let all the murderers and rapists be free, because its very very wrong to defend oneself, or to punish criminals to scare them off or to prevent them from doing more crime. Also, lets always have a FAIR FIGHT AND NOT BE PUSSIES. When we find out that someone has commited a murder, lets not send many cops to arrest him, lets just send one and suggest a FAIR FIGHT. You know, when i go to beat someone senseless, i have a good reason to do so, and right that moment i consider it so that he doesent have the right NOT TO get beaten the shit out of, otherwise i would not beat him so severly. Fair fights are fucking brainwash hypnosis for idiots with feeble morality. How about doing the right thing and not allowing the wrong thing?

Quote:

---

btw, were you ever present durring his courtdates/trials? were you there when he did what he's accused of doing? has he admited to you of what he did (age wise)...? if not then for all you know he picked up some chick that was just under 18 or even got lied to by the chick and screwed over, that shit happens alot... if you answer to all the above is "no" then you're even worse, cuz you don't know wtf he even went in for.. and btw...

---

1. He is said to be pedophile
2. He tries to pick up someone who is 7
3. That one happens to somehow be close to you.

So shut the fuck up. Besides, pedophilia is not the same as liking underaged people sexually. Its liking preteens sexually.

Quote:

---

wel then either way i lose, cuz if i were on your side you'd still hate me, cuz you are a fuckin loser who is lower then dirt.

---

Your logic is biased. Now lets wait for the brain cancer to occur and take effect.

Quote:

---

You gotta roll hard on that shit right from the get go know what I'm sayin man?
Fucking pedophiles, thinking they can just loose their desires on unwilling people. Yeah, it's a good thing you loosed a little violence of your own. I bet you feel great about it.
I bet you haven't even considered how you've just become the very thing you hated. Someone who just satiates their own desires regardless of the cost.
Have a great life man. Try and learn a little on the way.

---

Yeah, that is problematic. Because if i stole your weed, you could not steal it back without becoming a thief, a thing you hate, yourself. Also you would make the world a dark and gloomy place full of distress by committing a dark act.

Quote:

---

The problem is that people who beat the shit out of people are also pieces of shit who deserve to have the shit beat out of them.
If the only answer to violence is more violence then what makes you feel so "Justified" in it's use?
Is it ok for a child molester to molest because he himself was abused as a child? No, that's just an excuse. A horrible tragedy but an excuse nonetheless.
Does fighting a war on Terrorism mean it's ok for the President of the US to drop bombs that cause large amounts of civilian casualties? How does that differ from Terrorism? Oh, we just call it something different huh? Clever us.
There is no justice in violence.

---

Wow, what an idiot. Im 100% sure you dont acknowledge that right now you are using verbal violence yourself, so shut the fuck up you stupid hypocrite.

The fact of nature is that violence can cause two things:
1.More violence
2.End of violence

If you hit a brick, the energy of the movement keeps running in it, then when its power ends, it heads back and it rushes to your fist. The harder you hit, the more severe damage your fist will get. It will get completely broken. Also if you push a wall, the wall will push you back with the same force. However, if you hit the brick EVEN HARDER, very fast and very hard, hard enough for the energy to rush COMPLETELY THROUGH the brick, the brick will break and your hand will only get a little harmless scratch, maybe the skin will be bleeding. It will hurt, yes, but not much and the brick is destroyed. Also if you push the wall hard enough, it will move.

Its the same fucking thing with vengeance. Its true that you cant fight fire with fire, but you can fight steel with more steel, as long as you do it properly. Just like you can cause pain to yourself by hitting a hammer to your head, you can stop all pain at once for good if you just hit hard enough. But no, all the christianity-based moral is just all "fair fight!" "violence makes violence!" "pot is evil!".

I dont like preaching the way christians do, but everyone should try getting some new views about justice, therefore:

www.churchofsatan.com

I wouldnt say im completely a satanist myself, since after all im partly an altruistic person, believing that altruistic behavior, even if a lie, is part of human nature.

PS: The brainwashing bullshit about "fair fights" and "sinking to ones level" can be seen in like a billion movies. Have a little pondering and realize its stupidity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EternalEnemy

When we find out that someone has commited a murder, lets not send many cops to arrest him, lets just send one and suggest a FAIR FIGHT.

---

Lol.. just owned the thread, any way i would of done the same thing, anyone who molestes anyone underage and continues to do so after being convicted, should suffer and suffer severly.

I can't have any sympathy for the child molester. These guys are sick mother fuckers. People might try to say that he has rights too. But a 7 year old has the right not to be raped by some sick fucking pervert. As far as I'm concerned, once someone takes that right away from a child they lose all their own rights and are fair game. I have a two year old daughter and I can guarantee that if some peophile ever touches her, he better damn hope the police find him before I do.

On the other hand, I do have to agree that getting a bunch of guys together to jump him was a pretty punk ass thing to do. Did the guy get what he deserved? Yes, he deserved to have the shit beat out of him( at the very least) and that's what happened. Does it make you a bad ass for doing it with a bunch of other guys? No, your just some guy who was too much of a pussy to do it by yourself. There's no honor in it. The same as there's no honor in stabbing an unarmed person with a knife or shooting them with a gun. I'm generally opposed to violence but am not so naive to think that it's never justified. But if you've got to fight someone do it with honor: one on one and hand to hand. Whether you win or lose you can still go away with at least some pride.

would have done the same thing. and i would have ran his pockets, lol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nightfox

ok so there is this guy, a child molester. he just gets out of prison for being a complete sicko for molesting children. so he is not aloud near children. so up the town he is seen trying to pick up my best mates sister who is 7. these guys stop him and come and tell us. so tonight we caught him coming out of the bar. we followed him back to where he lives, and jumped him. now this guy is like 40 somehting, small and fucking creepy. we are all 16 and 17 there is 5 of us. we kick the fuck out of him, and smash his cell phone. he will probably need an ambulance, but i think he got what he deserves that sick fucker. plz tell me if this was the right thing to do, adn what would u of done. mind the police were told what he tried to do, and they said nothing could be done cause we had no evdience. so i think he got what he deserves, hes now lying in an alley, but i still think we did the right thing.

---

You think you did the right thing?! What are you, a fucking idiot or something?

First off, this is none of your business. He was "trying to pick her up" huh? How do you try and pick up a 7yr old? :confused: If he wanted her, he wouyld have grabbed her and left, not try and talk her into it.

Second, 5 on 1? Ya, real tough you fucking pansies.

Speaking of sick fuckers, 5 16 and 17 yr olds beating a helpless man senseless. You'll get a major Karma for this you. And no, you didn't do the right thing. You are not the law.

Kick his ass fuck it then throw him in a lake..

What I find absolutely amazing is how much sympathy people have for a CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTER.

Quote:

---

But a 7 year old has the right not to be raped by some sick fucking pervert. As far as I'm concerned, once someone takes that right away from a child they lose all their own rights and are fair game.

---

so then what about the punk ass kids? does a human being have the right to not be ganged up on? soon as they gang up on someone that has no defense against that many people, by your logic they too should be fair game and stripped of all rights... stop just looking at the crime.. look at the similairities...

7yr. old and a pedophile:
7 yr. old has no defense.
pedophile is fuckin someone up for life.
pedophile has a severe advantage over the child.
pedophile is gaining self gratification at the expense of someone else's pain.

5 punk ass kids and a pedophile:
pedophile has no defense.
punk ass kids are fuckin someone up for life.
punk ass kids have a severe advantage over the pedophile.
punk ass kids are gaining self gratification at the expense of someone else's pain.

As another person mentioned previously, why was the 7-year-old left unattended in an alley? Not to mention, there are many holes in your story. I'm assuming if this man just got out of prison, then he's paroled. Therefore, as a pedophile, he's most likely barred from contact or speaking to young children. If this is in fact real, I'd recommend discussing this matter with him and his parole officer. Why use violence to amend a situation that could be easily settled with diplomacy?

wow I guess there no point in adding somethin in this thread...who can tell what was the right thing to do..as I just read everything and I admit that a couple of them have convincing strong ideas on both sides wether it was right or wrong to beat the guy. In my opinion, violence is not the anwser but for others it is.

There is and always will be a north and a south. We are either between the poles, at one of these poles and thank god some are able to be neutral (or accepting a little of both sides). thats were peace exist...hehe

I wont tell you what should have been done....it happened..thats all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fengzi

What I find absolutely amazing is how much sympathy people have for a CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTER.

---

i don't have sympathy for a conivcted child molester.. i have sympathy for some poor guy who got his ass beat by a bunch of punk ass kids... i'm not even against him getting his ass beat down (cuz i know he didint' get it in prison) but either be a man about it, and do it toe-to-toe, or leave it to someone else...

damn if the police investigate what happened, you just admitted the whole act on the internet!

I'm pretty sure that this is just some bullshit story to try to impress all of his friends on the internet and seem macho. The lengths that some people will go to...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho

so then what about the punk ass kids? does a human being have the right to not be ganged up on? soon as they gang up on someone that has no defense against that many people, by your logic they too should be fair game and stripped of all rights... stop just looking at the crime.. look at the similairities...

7yr. old and a pedophile:
7 yr. old has no defense.
pedophile is fuckin someone up for life.
pedophile has a severe advantage over the child.
pedophile is gaining self gratification at the expense of someone else's pain.

5 punk ass kids and a pedophile:
pedophile has no defense.
punk ass kids are fuckin someone up for life.
punk ass kids have a severe advantage over the pedophile.
punk ass kids are gaining self gratification at the expense of someone else's pain.

---

Jesus Christ man, we're you dropped on your head as a baby or are you just plain stupid? How can you even begin to compare the 7 year old and the pedophile? Let me point a few things out for you:

-The child was 100% innocent and had never done anything wrong
-The pedophile had already molested a child, or children, before. He is not innocent.

-The child had no choice about what happened to him or her
-What happened to the pedophile was due to a choice he had already made.

-The child was totally hepless
-The pedophile wasn't helpless, he was a grown man who had already survived prision, a place not known for its good treatment of child molesters. he was outnumbered, not helpless.

-A child is pure, sweet, and innocent
-A pedophile is fucking human scum, the lowest of all lows. He is, in a single word-Evil.

I really pity you if you can't see the difference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fengzi

What I find absolutely amazing is how much sympathy people have for a CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTER.

---

I have NO sympathy for a molester, none, but that still doesn't make it okay for 5 kids, to jump him, and gang beat him. It solves nothing, not a damn thing.

Not to mention this story sounds fabricated. A convicted child molester would no way in hell be allowed to get near her or to "pick-up" a 7-yr old. Again, how do you "pick-up" a 7yr old?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho

i don't have sympathy for a conivcted child molester.. i have sympathy for some poor guy who got his ass beat by a bunch of punk ass kids... i'm not even against him getting his ass beat down (cuz i know he didint' get it in prison) but either be a man about it, and do it toe-to-toe, or leave it to someone else...

---

Well, here we are partly in agreement. I can't see how he can ever be "some poor guy" after being a "convicted child molester but I do agree the beating should have been done in a more honorable way. Did you read the end of my first post?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fengzi

On the other hand, I do have to agree that getting a bunch of guys together to jump him was a pretty punk ass thing to do. Did the guy get what he deserved? Yes, he deserved to have the shit beat out of him( at the very least) and that's what happened. Does it make you a bad ass for doing it with a bunch of other guys? No, your just some guy who was too much of a pussy to do it by yourself. There's no honor in it. The same as there's no honor in stabbing an unarmed person with a knife or shooting them with a gun. I'm generally opposed to violence but am not so naive to think that it's never justified. But if you've got to fight someone do it with honor: one on one and hand to hand. Whether you win or lose you can still go away with at least some pride.

---

Hey man thats fuckin awesome, im not for kickin ppl's asses for the hell of it but just think what that lil faggot did to those kids lives that he raped, he RUINED it they will be scared for life without a doubt, the guys is lucky i probably would have killed him if i seen a perv tryin to pick up a kid....

molestors should be fed their own balls... they are sick fux!

its not about things being "fair" in this situation guys, was it fair for the 40 yr old to rape a little kid?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nochowderforyou

Not to mention this story sounds fabricated. A convicted child molester would no way in hell be allowed to get near her or to "pick-up" a 7-yr old. Again, how do you "pick-up" a 7yr old?

---

Yeah, it does sound a bit far fetched but don't be naive. There was a really high profile case out here in California a while back. In 1972 a guy named Kenneth Parnell kidnapped a 7 year old boy named Steven Stayner (his brother, Cary Staner went nuts years later and murdered three women in Yosemite). Parnell kept Steven as his personal sex slave for 7 years until the kid miraclously escaped. Parnell was convicted and served 5 years (unbeliveable-two years less than he had held Steven prisoner!!) Well, in 2002 he was convicted again of trying to "buy" a 5 year old boy. At least now he'll never see the light of day again. Here's the full story if you're interested

http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal...ell/index.html

So, while the story may be fabricated I don't doubt that a child molester would have access to, or the desire to go after, another child after being released.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho

it's people like you and your friends i truely despise... why didn't just one of you take him, if he's so "little"

---

yeah gaining up on him was not the way to do it, the girls brother should have been the one 2 fuck his shit up

that guy said the "punk ass kids" fuked up this guys life by kicking his ass... well if so it was about time...
Think about it... These Child Molesters dont think what they are doing is wrong, so if they even go to jail, which most do not! When they get out they get to live a normal life and be happy... which Ive seen a lot do!
BUT the child that was molested has to live with it the rest of their life, they are haunted by it... every day they have to deal with the abuse they went through... They cant have normal relationships... Therapy, Drugs, all the shit they have to go through cos of these piece of shit people who get off on little kids.
If he got beat down, then basically Karma did its thing, now maybe he can think about why this happened... maybe realize hes scum too!

this was the right thing to do kick his ass

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho

wow you just get worse and worse... do you realize if the media got ahold of this information all of a sudden (yet again, after it took so long to drop that image) "marijuana institutes violence" grow the fuck up... seriously...

---

You are one of the most ignorant people I've ever met. Enough said! What makes you think that the media would take sides with the anti-marijuana groups? The headlines could just as easily have been, "Group of teens assault local child molester while high". I think you need to take a little bit of your own advice and "grow the fuck up..." because aren't you a 19 year old who got married at 18 or something like that? Way to go, mary the first chick you meet. REAL mature there dood.

If a convicted child molester was hanging ANYWHERE around a 7 year old girl i knew much less was trying to pick her up, I would have probably killed him.

I guess you're just one of those people who thinks that someone else will do it for them, well get a brain hommie g because aint nobody here but you. When the time comes are you going to stand up for yourself and the peolple you love? No you'd just as easily let a 7 year old girl get raped RIGHT?

seems like some of yal are misunderstanding me... i'm not even saying he didn't deserve to get his ass kicked... (tho there are lots of better ways, wow some guy gets his ass kicked, gee that sure is gonna make him think "oh i better not do it again, i might get beat up") but the 5 on 1 is total bullshit, and then, atleast in my eyes, he drops the title of victimizer to victim... reguardless of what anyone's done, they dont' deserve to have the shit beat out of them by 5 people, 4 people or even 2 people... if we're gonna start gang beating people for crimes, why not start with theives, and burglars, and car jackers, and hell.. after that's done we can turn to the assaulters that gang beat the people "who deserved it" because now they've commited a crime as well, assault, and we can continue beating the shit out of each other til we're all so stupid and wound up in muscle and ass whooping, the real criminals get smarter and don't get caught at all...

maybe none of you have stopped to realize this yet...
pedophile trys to get a kid, people jump him and law isn't involved at all... wow what's that? he's out on the streets still, how does beating his ass help anything at all? what exactly did it do? that's right, nothing...

pedophile trys to pick up a kid, he gets there and there's a whole shitload of cops waiting for him becuase it was a set up... oh he's arrested, may get out on parole but as we all know, they will do it again, oh what's that he was set up again, this time he goes to prison, may get out in 4 or 5 years, happens again, this time he doesn't get out...

now which would you rather have? pedophile get his ass kicked even to the brink of death, he heals and he's still on the streets..
or..
pedophile keeps fuckin up and doing the same old shit, eventually it's 3rd strike and you're out, now he's in prison for the rest of his life where he can't ever get near a kid again..

i have a son, i think i like the 2nd one better...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by God v2.0

You are one of the most ignorant people I've ever met. Enough said! What makes you think that the media would take sides with the anti-marijuana groups? The headlines could just as easily have been, "Group of teens assault local child molester while high". I think you need to take a little bit of your own advice and "grow the fuck up..." because aren't you a 19 year old who got married at 18 or something like that? Way to go, mary the first chick you meet. REAL mature there dood.

If a convicted child molester was hanging ANYWHERE around a 7 year old girl i knew much less was trying to pick her up, I would have probably killed him.

I guess you're just one of those people who thinks that someone else will do it for them, well get a brain hommie g because aint nobody here but you. When the time comes are you going to stand up for yourself and the peolple you love? No you'd just as easily let a 7 year old girl get raped RIGHT?

---

actually i'm very intelligent, you can sit there thinking of how to beat someone up, while i think of ways to do worse then physical pain can, i do have a brain and i use it, the way you talk i think you think with your knuckles. media would take anti-drug side because it already does, because media is on side with govt. they wouldnt' see it as "kids on marijuana beat up child molester" i garuntee the headline would have said "kids on marijuana brutally assault man" and not that this even mattters cuz now you're just grasping at straws, i'm 20 and married at 18, and i enjoy every second of it, i've known my wife for 7 years now, and would never think of being with anyone else other than her... so yea... and no i don't think someone else will do it for me, and if my family was in danger, or in danger of being in danger i wouldn't just stand around doing nothing, but i would use my fuckin brain and think of the ways to hurt him more than any physical beating will, and as for killing him, you go ahead.. while you're sitting in prison for life or on death row for murder, i'll be out here, in the free, enjoying my freedoms and loving every second of my life.. so tell me who's more ignorant, someone who has a brain and uses it, or someone who has a brain and thinks violence solves everything? somehow i picture you being an old drunk wife beater because she wants to divorce you...

ok, this is for all of you with hard-on's for "justice".

If the man in question had just gotten out of prison, then he'd already served his time. You can't keep punishing someone for the same crime. It's like having a friend who bums bowls from you and keeps reminding you of that one time he chipped in for gas money. After awhile, it gets old. You wouldn't keep rewarding people over and over for the same act. Maybe you should, but it wouldn't be "just", would it...

The cops wouldn't get involved because there was no evidence? Then there probably wasn't. Because cops love to roll with authority and if they didn't, its probably because it was just some halfass story from a couple punk kids that they were smart enough to see through as opposed to believing.

A little problem of "innocent until proven guilty"? Apparently that can be ignored if it gets in the way of justice. But then justice is simply mob rule. Hardly worth getting excited over or even upholding. If you want to say that might makes right you may as well just agree to allowing all the pedophiles and perverts loose. I fail to see the distinction.

Thoughts?

Oh, and as for verbal violence. There's an obvious distinction because, simply to start with, it can be ignored as opposed to physical violence. Most distinctly though, my goal is not to create violence, but rather questioning that might lead to your own mental development. Is that violent?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polymirize

ok, this is for all of you with hard-on's for "justice".

If the man in question had just gotten out of prison, then he'd already served his time. You can't keep punishing someone for the same crime. It's like having a friend who bums bowls from you and keeps reminding you of that one time he chipped in for gas money. After awhile, it gets old. You wouldn't keep rewarding people over and over for the same act. Maybe you should, but it wouldn't be "just", would it...

The cops wouldn't get involved because there was no evidence? Then there probably wasn't. Because cops love to roll with authority and if they didn't, its probably because it was just some halfass story from a couple punk kids that they were smart enough to see through as opposed to believing.

A little problem of "innocent until proven guilty"? Apparently that can be ignored if it gets in the way of justice. But then justice is simply mob rule. Hardly worth getting excited over or even upholding. If you want to say that might makes right you may as well just agree to allowing all the pedophiles and perverts loose. I fail to see the distinction.

Thoughts?

Oh, and as for verbal violence. There's an obvious distinction because, simply to start with, it can be ignored as opposed to physical violence. Most distinctly though, my goal is not to create violence, but rather questioning that might lead to your own mental development. Is that violent?

---

my thoughts on all this, is you're wise... and basicly say the same things i'm thinking. atleast some people in this thread actually "think" about it instead of saying "oh a sex offender he deserves to have the shit beat out him day in day out"...

and yes cops seem to love to throw criminals such as, assualtists, rapsists, robbers and all that in jail at the first sign of anything wrong... so i still stick with the fact that if this story is all true, then he would have been in custody immedieatly, therefore he wouldn't have been jumped. so there's something about this story not being told... there's no way any cop would've heard "a convicted molester was just trying to get my friends 7 yr. old sister" and not done something about it..

Thoughts, Ok, here goes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polymirize

ok, this is for all of you with hard-on's for "justice".

The cops wouldn't get involved because there was no evidence? Then there probably wasn't. Because cops love to roll with authority and if they didn't, its probably because it was just some halfass story from a couple punk kids that they were smart enough to see through as opposed to believing.?

---

Good point. Yes, it is certainly possible that this whole story was created by whoever the hell is was(I've long forgotten by now) that started this thread. Then again, most of us do know that many adults, especially cops, aren't too likely to take the words of some stoner kids seriously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polymirize

A little problem of "innocent until proven guilty"? Apparently that can be ignored if it gets in the way of justice. But then justice is simply mob rule. Hardly worth getting excited over or even upholding. If you want to say that might makes right you may as well just agree to allowing all the pedophiles and perverts loose. I fail to see the distinction.

---

Another good point. After re-reading the original post again I do see it was a story of "he head from so and so, who heard from so and so, who heard from..." So yeah, it sounds like the guys who did the beating really were in the wrong. If they had seen it themselves it would be different.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polymirize

If the man in question had just gotten out of prison, then he'd already served his time. You can't keep punishing someone for the same crime. It's like having a friend who bums bowls from you and keeps reminding you of that one time he chipped in for gas money. After awhile, it gets old. You wouldn't keep rewarding people over and over for the same act. Maybe you should, but it wouldn't be "just", would it... .

---

So, it sounds like you belive the penalties for child molesters are appropriate? What about the 5 years that guy got after keeping, and repeatedly raping a little boy for 7 years? Is that justice? Should we simply say that he's a swell guy because he served his time. The bottom line is that the penalties for this type of crime are a joke. You could get a longer term for selling weed. These guys, in my opinion, are the worst of the worst. To me, raping a child is a far more horrific crime than shooting some store clerk in a common hold up. And yet, when they get out we're expected to just accept them because they served thier time. Fuck that, I say throw them in a dark little hole for the rest of their lives. Cruel and unusual? Too fucking bad. Sticking your dick in 7 year old girl is pretty cruel and unusual too. They should have thought about that ahead of time.

man if i was there all your lives would have changed.i would a made some one throw up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pixel

probably the best point i've seen on this whole thread, ( although i enjoyed penguin's mind body and spirit post :rasta: )

---

Thanks Pixel.

The gist of that post is that you were wrong to beat him up, and he was wrong to be a pedophile.

If you enjoyed yourself while doing it, not in the sense of enjoying justice served, but in the sense of maliciously harming a fellow human being, then you are no better than he.

If you enjoyed doing the justice and getting him off the streets, then you're fine except for the unescapable fact that you hurt a fellow human being's Body *vague reference to Mind Body and Spirit post*.

Good day, and arguing over this is not going to show anything.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho

so then what about the punk ass kids? does a human being have the right to not be ganged up on? soon as they gang up on someone that has no defense against that many people, by your logic they too should be fair game and stripped of all rights... stop just looking at the crime.. look at the similairities...

7yr. old and a pedophile:
7 yr. old has no defense.
pedophile is fuckin someone up for life.
pedophile has a severe advantage over the child.
pedophile is gaining self gratification at the expense of someone else's pain.

5 punk ass kids and a pedophile:
pedophile has no defense.
punk ass kids are fuckin someone up for life.
punk ass kids have a severe advantage over the pedophile.
punk ass kids are gaining self gratification at the expense of someone else's pain.

---

Attacking a defenseless person is no different than attacking a person who can defend his or herself. They are equally wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slpntrx5

dude, that story was the shit. that fucker got what was coming to him man. child molesters suck big time.

---

agread, as i recall... u said,"sum 40 year old dude, that was SMALL and CREAPY" a small guy dosen't require more then one person and maybe 1 person to back you up. i had the same prolblem with my neabhor and my brother. and he is small. i brought one other friend with me, and the other friend was for the guys son.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polymirize

ok, this is for all of you with hard-on's for "justice".

If the man in question had just gotten out of prison, then he'd already served his time. You can't keep punishing someone for the same crime. It's like having a friend who bums bowls from you and keeps reminding you of that one time he chipped in for gas money. After awhile, it gets old. You wouldn't keep rewarding people over and over for the same act. Maybe you should, but it wouldn't be "just", would it...

The cops wouldn't get involved because there was no evidence? Then there probably wasn't. Because cops love to roll with authority and if they didn't, its probably because it was just some halfass story from a couple punk kids that they were smart enough to see through as opposed to believing.

A little problem of "innocent until proven guilty"? Apparently that can be ignored if it gets in the way of justice. But then justice is simply mob rule. Hardly worth getting excited over or even upholding. If you want to say that might makes right you may as well just agree to allowing all the pedophiles and perverts loose. I fail to see the distinction.

Thoughts?

Oh, and as for verbal violence. There's an obvious distinction because, simply to start with, it can be ignored as opposed to physical violence. Most distinctly though, my goal is not to create violence, but rather questioning that might lead to your own mental development. Is that violent?

---

Polymirize, you are the mind's needs incarnate. They would do well to listen to you.

Don't focus on how he was outnumbered. 5 people can kill a man, 1 person can kill a man, even in hand to hand combat. It's not a deal of fairness, and I see it as fairer to get the job done quickly than to drag it out and dramatize it.

Pain is pain, if it takes an incident such as that to keep a pedophile in line, so be it. Don't make a muck out of it. He hasn't expressed that he's going to go out and start beating wimpy people with his friends, and for all we know he's generally a pacifistic person, but a pedophile going after a familiar face...that's enough to throw you off the edge. :twocents:

you all gotta stfu. this guy molested children. IMHO he should've gotten the death penalty. how do you think those children feel? Their lives are fucked up forever and this kids friends sister almost had the same fate and they taught him a fucking lesson. will he ever try again? not unless hes really stupid.

he obviously tried doing it again after prison. so prison doesnt work, a violent beatdown does.

and just cause he got fucked up by 5 or 6 people doesnt mean their pussies for not fighting 1v1. 1v1 would've been more honorable but the fight wasnt over a dispute, it was done to deliver pain and suffering to this fucking loser. and he got what he deserved.

Thank you, Nightfox, for keeping child molesters at bay.

ok obviously i didn't say where i was living, i am living in the UK, not america or canada, so this bullshit about parole is not right. over here, if u recall the man who kill and raped two teenage girls, well when he gets out the government wants him to go to australia, because the government says it would be to much to PROTECT him. over here they help fucking perverts and try to put them back into society. and about the girl being in a back alley. well this little girl was getting back from school becasue her mom and dad was working. the fucking freak caught he going down the back alley on her way home. luckly a few ppl saw him and stoped him before he could grab her. ok. i do understand that maybe it wasn't right for all five of us to beat the fuck out of him, but think, if this happend to some one u knew, wouldn't u be filled with rage and anger and want to get a piece of this fucking asshole. we don't consider ourselves a bunch of "punk ass kids", but we do think that this asshole will think twice about trying to pick up little children.

BTW I think this is all bull, you want me to belive you are so ballsy that you would smoke pot over the guy's bruised corpse in public its just not done in real life. You made up a story to sound cool to some strangers on the internet, if you did it then why do you need to tell us so bad?