my dad calls it grass. i like it much better because grass is peaceful and flows with the wind. it also makes everything a lot more prettyQuote:
Originally Posted by hihigh
Printable View
my dad calls it grass. i like it much better because grass is peaceful and flows with the wind. it also makes everything a lot more prettyQuote:
Originally Posted by hihigh
I call it all of these - weed, grass, pot, ganj, Jay, MJ.
Something as great as it is deserves many different names;)
yeah but "pot" is just an annoying name. I can understand it being called "bud", "dope", "grass", "ganj" and best yet "weed". But "pot"?!!!! Hell no....that sounds about as stupid a s calling soda "pop".
Hah I use "Pot" most of all. That is what it always was when I was in HS a college in the 80s and 90s. "potheads", "smoking pot"... I dont know I like calling it pot and do :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopa
alright it's ok to call it whatever you want I was just sayin that the word "pot" isn't used by young people in HS these days and if they do call it "pot" they're losers or long haired hippys like i said :P
Well dude all I know is John Lennon and the Beatles put the lyrics ??smoke pot, smoke pot, everybody smoke pot? in the song ??I am the Walrus?. So if anything I would say you and your friends that don??t like the term ??pot? are the losers and everyone else is cool! LOL :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dopa
Seriously?
marijuana = the weed that intoxicates
Why does everyone call marijuana an intoxicant?
It's effects are non-toxic.
in-'-ant is the difference.
Psychoactivity doesn't require intoxicants. Cannabis is a Cannabinoid-receptoricant.
Quote:
shut the fuck up
LOL ahah yes
innnttooxxiicaaatteeeedddd derm derm ddeem intoxicaateedddd yeahh
"Drug and Alcohol Review (1994) 13:209-216
Commentary
The human toxicity of marijuana: a critique of a review by Nahas and Latour.
by Macdonald J. Christie & Greogory B. Chesher
Department of Pharmacology,University of Sydney,New South Wales,Australia
Abstract
A review entitled "The human toxicity of marijuana" was published in 1992
in the Medical Journal of Australia. The authors claimed that the adverse
effects of cannabis use have been trivialised and that the effects are
much more serious than earlier reported. We have made a careful study of this
review and examined the claims made. We compared the claims of the authors
with the information contained in the documents they cited and found that
at least 28 of the 35 citations in this article were cited inaccurately.
Five of these publications were misquoted,or the findings of the study
were not fully reported. Twenty-three citations contained other errors,
leaving only six to eight (two citations could not be traced because of
their obscurity) accurate citations among the 35. All of these inaccuracies
operated in the direction of finding an adverse effect of marijuana.
Introduction
It is not a pleasant task to make an open criticism of a paper by colleagues,
but we feel compelled to do so in the case of a paper published in the Medical
Journal of Australia in 1992.. . etc "
Dude, you've got 8 post. Who you callin' a new guy? hahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Marijuana
Heh.....my friends and I call it "Fred".....if you're checking around to see if anyone is holding, you call and ask if Fred is there... have you seen Fred around...when will Fred be back...etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedpantsman
well... :)Quote:
....When i think of weed i think of some obnoxious...