The first truly immersive 3D game was Mario 64. Think about it man. really think about it. I can't remember could you look up and down in doom and sonic? And TRULY explore the world with such realism?
Printable View
The first truly immersive 3D game was Mario 64. Think about it man. really think about it. I can't remember could you look up and down in doom and sonic? And TRULY explore the world with such realism?
Thats funny cuz all I heard was that they could play Xbox games...First I heard the other way...Quote:
Xbox 360 can't play Xbox games unless microsoft makes a program to convert them, and that'll probably be limited...
And BTW i'm 16 and a Nintendo fan. You do not have to be 30 to know what gaming is about and what Nintendo done to bring gaming to a new level. Don't diss on the 15 years olds cuz we know much too.
XBOX 360 IS compatable with regular XBox Games as long as you have the Hard Drive add-on. So, in otherwords, if you bought the $300 Core version, unless you shell out another 100 bucks for the detachable hard drive, you aren't going to be able to play regular xbox games. You might as well just go with the 400 dollar version that includes the detachable hard drive, and get a headset and wireless controller with it. As for the first 3d game... Super Mario 64 was the first true 3D game (a total 3D world)... as for games that can be considered "3D"... It wasn't Doom or Sonic 3D as the first one... If my mind serves me correctly it would be Wolfenstein 3D....Quote:
Originally Posted by MudFu
Ok well I don't want XBox anyways...NINTENDO ALL THE WAY Lol :P...I can play GC games and classic nintendo games plus whatever they release on that system. Who needs Xbox.
Look buddy I'm not (dissing)(your words not mine) 15 year olds. I'm talking about narrow minded people who say one system rules and don't look back on the heratige or innovation of the industry. I choose the Nintendo army because I know that graphics are not the key to winning the war anymore. That's old thinking and that's lost. The new way is innovation. Why is Apple always in the news? ummm.....thats right say it with me peopleQuote:
Originally Posted by MudFu
I...N...N...O...V...A...T...I...O...N. "Now lets go hang our sweater in the closet and learn how to tie our shoes." (Expert From Mr. Rogers R.I.P.)
Now I'm done arguing with you about video games. I'm going back to growing MJ.
:stoned:
im a sony man...i am a hardcore rpg fan...so im gunna wait for that...
i cant wait for the new metal gear solids...
i cant afford the system for at least a year after it gets out...
wait till the price is down...im not gunna play games for $400...i could buy a new guitar with that!!!
im buying some hand drums soon...they have to be skin heads...sound better...any brand suggestions???
I don't like the looks of the revolution button layout. the buttons are all spread out down the controller just like a tv remote, I dont' see how you could hit any one of them as fast as you could with a traditional controller.
did anyone even look at the link i posted? with the killzone 2 trailer?
...who was arguing???...:S anyways I didn't mean to say "diss"...god I hate that I have to change my post now Lol...anyways...Quote:
Now I'm done arguing with you about video games. I'm going back to growing MJ.
Classic case of juding befor undetstanding. I get what your saying cuz I said it two BUT the a and b buttons on the bottom and not ment for the new games of revoloution but for the classic games from NES. You are able to DL the old games and play them. With the remote all you have to do is turn it to the side and use the D pad to move and the a/b are the old classic buttons. I'm going to try and say classic a lot now...Quote:
I don't like the looks of the revolution button layout. the buttons are all spread out down the controller just like a tv remote, I dont' see how you could hit any one of them as fast as you could with a traditional controller.
wouldn't there be a lack of available buttons for more options then? I mean if you need, say, shoot/open door/check journal/reload weapon/change weapon/back/check inventory/turn-on fashlight/melae.... it seems there's no enough bottons for the game :confused:
You see this is how Nintendo is breaking through the remote barrier. Everything is done by YOUR movments. You swing your arm you can swing the sword in the game. Their is an A and B botton that is used for things that you can not do physicaly. Shooting would be done my pressing the B button which is placed on the back of the remote much like how the Z was place for N64. Their are more then enough bottons for the system...PS series and the Xboxs series have to many buttons and that makes people think that you need many buttons to play a game.
all i have to say is that all these young kids have it made...when i was growing up, all i had was atari and basic 8 bit nintendo.
I feel sorry for you...but then again I grew up playing NES and SNES and cleco(I think its called that...well close enough anyways). Sure I remember playing the ancient sega systems...
i like old nintendo systems...i think they went the wrong way with the gamecube...
i like the snes and nes cause they are great games, and i can play them stoned (i get lost playing anything more complicated)
other then nes, snes, and atari, im a playstation man...the old sega games are pretty cool...but sony makes some great rpgs...
i heard they were changing the concept of final fantasy...i think the makers of that are definantly going in the wrong direction...the new final fantasy 10 was VERY short (compared to others) and the makeup was simple...sure, it had good graphics, but thats definantly not everything...FF7 is still my favorite, and that is for the playstation...made many years ago...
xenosaga is great...
x-box is only good for group playing...i dont like the games if its not with a friend...
I feel like I'm a promoter for Nintendo...Lol...anyways yea Gamecube could have been way better...I still own one mind you, but it could have been better. It wasn't the system itself, but rather the games. Nothing for the older players.
ColecoVisionQuote:
Originally Posted by MudFu
Oddessy
Atari 2600
Atari 5200
Sega Master System
Turbo Grafix 16
Atari Jaguar
Yeah I think you meant the Coleco Vision. Sear had their own version too. Remember the games were only betwwen $2 and $10 dollars each? That was the shit. I liked indiana jones and rampage. The Oddessy had an acsessory you plugged into the cartridge slot and a keyboard. You typed in text and a female voice spoke it back. Back then that was just unheard of. :)
I'm gay.Quote:
Originally Posted by STDzRus
We could tell by tell by your avatar. lol just kidding.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefer Rogue
:D
PC still owns all of them. Just look at two of the games out for both. Call of Duty 2 and Tiger Woods 2006, both are much better on PC than on 360!
I don't really care much for games on computers. Some are ok like Starcraft or Warcraft but stuff like Counter-Strike seems to me that it should be on a system.
im getting the 360 and thats all ill have for a while unless i get a roommate next year that has a ps3. if not ill buy one like january 2007. ill have the 360 to hold me over.
Good one, i almost laughed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trichome Creator