"Seven is Exploding"
http://www.911hoax.com/domaincloak.a...%3D58h0LjdMry0
Printable View
"Seven is Exploding"
http://www.911hoax.com/domaincloak.a...%3D58h0LjdMry0
Hopefully a body of evidence that cannot be swept under the carpet will cause a new independent investigation. How about a multinational team of our supporters and non supporters.
Danish chemist giving an interview on that he and a group of scientists found nano-thermite (!) in dust from WTC 911.
YouTube - Niels Harrit, fra K�¸benhavn universitet taler om nano-spr�¦ngstof i st�¸vet fra WTC p�¥ TV2 News.
You don't have to look any further than the Warren Commission to see what out government is capable of. Sealed for 50 years, why?Quote:
Originally Posted by rudy2010
Americans need to wake up to the fact that a lot of pertinent information is with held from them for supposedly national security reasons. There is no such thing. There is absolutely NOTHING that should be kept from the American people, we all have a right to know.
Agreed. Lets not keep JFK, Martin Luther King and 911 in the closet. Lets see the details of those investigations. Including those who have been hushed up like the New Orleans DA that pursued the JFK case. Bring out the folks in the pentagon who insisted they smelled cordite and lets see what their conclusions are.
The family of MLK does not believe that James Earl Ray assasinated MLK and have been calling for a new investigation. There is not really a need to investigate. Rather just gather the info that exists somewhere. Some taxi driver named Raul claims he shot MLK. There were two army A teams in Memphis on the day MLK was shot and the implications lead back to the LBJ whitehouse.
Lets see more exposure on this and other hidden issues.
Agree! So join your local WAC (We Are Change) chapter or some freedom-loving group and be the change you want to see in the world!Quote:
Originally Posted by rudy2010
Most importantly - Challenge Authority!!
The sad thing is this is a covert totalitarian country. The murderer is the investigator. How could you have the truth? Unless there is a thorough reform of the Feds, you have to remain as a tame sheep.
The evidence was given two months ago by the professinals. Yet no media report it.
Quote:
Evidence Refutes the Official 9/11 Investigation: The Scientific Forensic Facts
by Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts
Global Research, October 13, 2010
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - 2010-10-04
AE911Truth Delivers the Evidence to the Media: Press Conference - National Press Club â?? Washington DC
Ed. â?? This is the actual 10-minute statement read by Richard Gage, AIA, to the media at the AE911Truth press conference at the National Press Club in Washington DC on September 9, 2010.
Good afternoon, my name is Richard Gage, AIA. Iâ??m a member of the American Institute of Architects; Iâ??ve been a licensed architect for 22 years; And Iâ??m the founder of the non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth).
As a group, we now have more than 1,270 architect and engineer petition signers. Collectively, we have more than 25,000 years of building and technical experience. This press conference is being given by our petition signers and supporters today in 65 [it turned out to be 67] locations around the world, including 30 states and 4 countries.
Today, weâ??re here to inform you that we have uncovered evidence that the official investigations into what happened to the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 were deeply flawed, or worse. The scientific forensic facts we have discovered have very troubling implications.
For example, a technologically advanced, highly energetic material has been discovered in World Trade Center dust from the 9/11 catastrophe.
This follows the discovery, by the United States Geological Survey and others, of high concentrations of unusual previously molten iron-rich microspheres in the WTC dust. These microspheres can only have been formed during the destruction of the World Trade Center at temperatures far higher than can be explained by the jet fuel and office fires. Those fires, we are told by engineers employed by NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, were allegedly the cause of the World Trade Centerâ??s destruction. The discovery of this advanced energetic material, in the form of red/gray chips distributed throughout the dust, both explains the iron-rich microspheres and confirms the inadequacy of the official account of what happened that tragic day.
Even before the microspheres and red/gray chips had been identified and brought to our attention, we were deeply concerned about other aspects of the destruction of these iconic buildings, and how they were investigated. More than two dozen firefighters, engineers, and other witnesses reported seeing substantial quantities of molten iron or steel, flowing like lava in the debris under all three World Trade Center high-rises. Office fires and jet fuel cannot possibly reach the temperatures necessary to liquefy iron or steel. A mixture called thermite, consisting of pulverized iron oxide and aluminum, CAN generate temperatures above 4000°F -- far more than is needed to melt iron or steel, which melts at about 2750°F.
The energetic material that was found in the WTC dust by an international team of scientists (led by Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark) was reported in the peer-reviewed Bentham Open Journal of Chemical Physics. It consists of nano-engineered iron oxide and aluminum particles 1000th the size of a human hair, embedded in another substance consisting of carbon, oxygen, and silicon. The sizes of the iron oxide particles are extremely uniform, and neither they nor the ultra-fine-grain aluminum platelets could possibly have been created by a natural process such as a gravitational collapse or the impact of jetliners. The red/gray chips in which these particles were found exhibit the same characteristics as advanced energetic materials developed in US national laboratories in the years leading up to 9/11. They have no reason to be in this dust. Given all the horrific costs in human lives, lost civil liberties, and trillions of tax dollars spent in response to the official account of 9/11, there can be no more urgent need than for our country and the world to find out who put those materials in the World Trade Center â?? and why.
.....
Evidence Refutes the Official 9/11 Investigation: The Scientific Forensic Facts
Geraldo finally concedes that 911 truthers may be right.
YouTube - Geraldo Rivera On 911 Truthers - "The Most Obnoxious Protesters In Recent Years Are Right!!
YouTube - Geraldo Rivera On 911 Truthers - "The Most Obnoxious Protesters In Recent Years Are Right!!
We just need to get this information on the Daly Show. Then people might start to believe it. It may just take a fake news show making fun of the so called facts for folks to realize what happened.
I have not heard any given explanation for the fact that folks at the pentagon smelled cordite after the jet fuel explosion. The "official" pictures of the "jet liner" running into the pentagon just look like a cruise missle like some people claim it was. On the other hand if the jet did not crash into the pentagon where did it go and what happened to it.
If the fire is hot enough to burn the metal from the jet liner into vapors so none of it could be recovered it would have to have burned all the bodies to ashes. Yet all the bodies were recovered. I don't think they have even submitted a cover story to try to confuse this issue. Somebody or anybody explain how fire can be so hot it vaporizes the metal but doesn't burn a single human body.
Then explain the nano-engineered iron oxide and aluminum particles 1000th the size of a human hair too.
You can try to tell that to the 1,000's of members of the Clean up crew that Testify and have video evidence of the liquid pools of MOLTEN metal still burning 27 days after the collapse under the reckage....DO you under stand what that means? Jet fuel dosnt burn hot enouf to Weaken Steel to a point of collapse. The Original fire of the Planes went out so fast that there are ORIGINAL pictures of PEOPLE standing in the crash hole before the tower went down. All the floors went suddenly cut and the building goes down at free fall speed. So what the fuel pumped it self to every floor of the building and lit itself at the same time and all the floors just magicly broke at the same time....ONLY A FUCKING MORON would beleave the government Story. No PLANE HIT BUILDING 7????Quote:
Originally Posted by Xyz505
Why do none of you ever stop and think that the things you say don't make sense?
Millions of people saw the planes hit the towers with their own eyes, billions on live TV, soooooo...
Why demolish the buildings after the planes hit them? Do you REALLY think the US wouldn't have gone to war if the buildings had not collapsed?
Why hit the pentagon with a missile? If they can get planes to hit the WTC why couldn't the make one hit the pentagon?
If a plane didn't hit the pentagon what happened to that plane? Why hijack it at all if you're going to launch a missile at the target?
And a few million others.
911 Eyewitness - Help find the Truth!
This guys voice is freakin awsome.
andruejaysin many people are asking the same questions and they are legitimate as well.
My problem is with the improbability of the metalic portions of a plane burning, including the engines, but not the bodies inside. This is apparently the case with the plane that hit the Pentagon. You can correct me if I am wrong but I believe the story is that the plane that hit the Pentagon burned so thoroughly that no parts were recovered yet all the bodies in the plane were recovered. Do you have any explanation. Are my facts wrong? Do human bodies burn at a much higher temperature than metal? If you have any possible explanation for this please put it out here.
Maybe you or anyone else can explain the physics of how this is plausible or if my facts on the plane that hit the Pentagon are wrong.
Most metals don't burn at all at any practical temperature. Bodies don't burn terribly well either. Both do however tend to get smashed into very small pieces when they strike concrete at several hundred miles per hour. To say none of the plane was recovered is simply conspiracy theory nonsense. The bodies recovered in anything other than fragments were people who were in the buildings, not the planes. None of this mean the US government didn't exploit the situation to invade Iraq as they had long wanted to do anyway. But if they had planned the attacks they would have framed them directly and not Bin Laden.Quote:
Originally Posted by rudy2010
Thanks for the reasonable discussion. I will be happy to be proved wrong on this issue. However I followed some links on this issue from columnists in the main stream media and they pointed to some information that begs for further explanation at the very least.Quote:
Originally Posted by andruejaysin
One of the articles was about the plane that "hit the Pentagon". The experts in the article were told that no pieces of the jet survived the crash except a piece of one engine that was on the ground in front of the wreck. The official word was that all the metal of the plane "burned" and could not be recovered. However the bodies of all the passengers on the plane were recovered. The article also stated that several CIA personell interviewed after the crash indicated that they smelled the distinct smell of the explosive cordite.
It is fine to say the conspiracy theory is nonsense and this was my first opinion as well. Since I read the information available in the main stream media I have a number of questions that no one seems to be able to provide a reasonable explanation of.
Point me to some information not presented directly by the government that refutes this information. Show me the article that says I am wrong. In the mean time I have strong doubts.
There is no logical explanation to say why we would launch a missle. There are a few justifications but that is all theory. How did the actual plane just dissapear if a missle did strike the Pentagon. All this would require the cooperation of numerous agencies and many people and would be almost impossible to conceal. So I am realistic about that. There remains the problems with the Pentagon to be explained and now the nano particles. I am waiting for any reasonable explanation.
:smokin:
Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence? .
Monday, 29 November 2010 11:13 Christopher Bollyn .
An organization called the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) is calling for the public to demand that the district attorney of New York County investigate and prosecute those responsible for the destruction of the evidence from the crime scene. This is from their open letter/petition of June 23, 2010 to the district attorney's office:
Cy Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York County
Thomas Wornom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau
Dear Sirs:
Over the last three weeks you have been informed about the overwhelming evidence that World Trade Center Building 7 was demolished with explosives. I trust that you understand the serious implications of this crime and that you are resolved to prosecute the guilty parties. To provide a critical steppingstone in your investigation, I would like to bring to your attention the widely documented ¨C and widely protested ¨C destruction of physical evidence (structural steel) at the crime scene, which I contend is prosecutable pursuant to Article 205 of the New York Penal Code, ¡ì 205.50 Hindering Prosecution.
In the meantime, I recommend visiting the website of NYC CAN to understand the basis of their appeal for justice and the extent of the criminal destruction of evidence from the World Trade Center:
NYC Coalition For Accountability Now - Join
http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/ter...e-911-evidence
Do you think That we woulda went to war in 2 countries over maybe ~100 Us citizens deaths and just a few holes in a building. Comparied to 3,000 and 3 buildings coming down, multiple planes being hijacked, the pentagon being hit, and all that other shit....Yeah......I doubt it. your millions of other questions are FAIL.....compared to Floors FALLING AT FREE FALL SPEED. All three buildings came down As If all the floors were cut simutaniously. NO PLANE HIT WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING 7. Explain that.Quote:
Originally Posted by andruejaysin
This guy has another good point. Supposedly the towers collapsed because the metal suddenly reached a temp where it all collapsed. It is still unerving that the towers went down like a demolition but that is just what I saw with my own eyes. There is a big problem explaining how bldg 7 went down with the same clean demolition type collapse but had no fire burning to explain how this was possible. Just another troubling aspect of the governments official explanation.
Ask ya self this ?? would get 3 terrorist's in the same day flying plane's, and there was a possible 4th!! i dout it very much !! apparantly there was a forth circling a few miles away ?? so four terrorists flying planes in the same day !!!! hmmmmm!!
The Missle That HIT the Pentagon is ALL IT WAS...Even the one dude slipped up and said missle on National TV....IT is 100% FACT that The the speed and level of the MISSLE would be Impossible Even For Proffessional Airforce pilots to Be able to make that sort of Attack...Just another Lie in the HUGE pile of imposibilities that happened that day....
The Pentagon lawn was returfed with in hours of the "impact" and All the Pentagon Camera footage that seen what It was is Classified. But yet a week later (On the Returfed Lawn) That had no plane parts what so ever before it was returfed....They some how found the Passport of the hijacker...
that is 1000% Percent Circus DUNG.
A hundred deaths? Where does that number come from? Answer-You made it up because it suits your ideas. I was shocked that only 3000 people died. It's not just the people in the floors that were hit, it's everyone above. Most of those killed (except for the firefighters) were above the impact points. They were dead whether the buildings fell or not. Better killed in the collapse than burned alive when they couldn't climb any further. Watch where the collapse starts. Right where you would expect, at the point of impact. When you demolish building it starts at the bottom. So either someone set them in the midst of a raging fire or they were already there just hoping 1-The planes hit the right floor. And.. 2-No one notices the hundreds or thousand of pounds of explosives being set in their office. Why did building seven fall? Who knows? Maybe a contractor used cheap, sub-standard materials. You do who controlled the construction business in NY when they were built, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip06
I don't believe that the lives of three thousand Americans (with a few foreigners thrown in the picture) would make a single, small little bitty SHIT to the U.S. gubmint...They've already wasted the lives of more good Americans fuckin' around over in Iraq than the whole fuckin' bunch of greedy lying assholes is worth.
I'm just a regular old Joe that's a woodworker by trade. I have a pretty fair sense of size and space and I still can't see how you could fit a 757 into that little hole in the side of the Pentagon.
Is the U.S. Gubmint coverin' something up???...Shit I say!! It's what the crooked no conscious whores do for their billions!!!
Now, toke up and be happy:jointsmile:
Actually theres Testimony From Dozens and Dozens of First Responders who EXPEIRENCED EXPLOSIONS ON THE GROUND LEVEL INSIDE THE LOBBY AND ELEVADOR AREA...Not tomention the 100's of people who heard chain reaction explosions inside the towers, You can clearly see liquid metal pooring out several holes.....Explosions blowing out 30 floors below the hit point, Also the Fact that NANOTHERMITE has been tested for and Found in the Dust.. And that LIQUID POOLS OF METAL WERE STILL BURNING UNDER THE SITE FOR 27 DAYS..DO YOU UNDER STAND PHYSICAL SCIENCE?..Also If you Knew anything about these building is that THEY WERE BUILT TO WITH STAND MULTIPLE PLANE CRASHES.....And Even If the Cement gave out and crumbled...The Steel Structure Dosnt Crumble into dust...It remains In tact Straight Up In the SKY....NEVER in the HISTORY OF THE WORLD has any sky scraper Fell like this...Much less three at one time...And the First TWO towers fell JUST LIKE A DEMO, Only its somewhat concealed by the crumbling debree....Its made to look like a plane crash But Just laughable at how Obvious its assisted by explosives...So All that Jet fuel In those small tanks some how flowed to all the impossible odds and ends of that tower and Burned simutaneously to Make all the steel collapse at one time LOL...At FREE FALL SPEED....LMFAO...FREEFALL SPEED....THATS THE DEAD 100% CERTIFIED EXPLANATION RIGHT THERE....You are a FUCKING MORON if you dont under stand that...Quote:
Originally Posted by andruejaysin
Now the building fell because of "cheap substandard materials".:wtf: Come on I thought we were looking for a believable explanation. That explanation hardly cuts it. No one has explained or offered to explain why several experts at the Pentagon smelled cordite (used in explosives) after the explosion that should have just smelled like jet fuel.
Trip06 and andruejaysin looks like there is some good varifiable infomation out there regarding 9/11. Lets continue to present this good information as part of a reasonable discussion.
I am truly concerned about the unanswered questions about 9/11. The information I read from main stream media sources just leads to more questions for which reasonable answers have not been provided.
Do you really believe substandard materials led to the collapse of bldg7? I don't believe that even you really believe that is a reasonable explanation.
Just try to keep the responses here reasonable and courteous. This is a serious issue and all questions about this issue should be reasonably answered. Not just government proclamations.
So in ten years of sitting at a computer obsessively watching the building collapse you never noticed it doesn't collapse from the first floor? You need a new hobby, you just aren't very good at this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip06
Lets stick to the facts on this thread as much as possible. I know that this is a very emotional issue for a number of people. Just post what you have seen or read or whatever you believe. Please leave the insults out so we can continue to carry on in a reasonable manner.
I would really like to see some plausible explanations for the demolition like manner in which the 3 buildings fell, the absence of any plane parts in the Pentagon and why bomb experts testified they smelled cordite.
Most people don't believe official story of 911
Quote, â??
Poll in Germany: 89.5 doubt official version of 9/11
Submitted by coop on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:03am
â?¢ 9/11 Opinion Poll
A recent poll in the german magazine "Welt der Wunder" conducted by the well known Emnid Institute results in astonishing 89% of the german respondents not believing the official line 9/11. The magazine in 2010 already published the story of NATOs "secret nuclear war", where the consequences of the widespread use of depleted uranium ammunitions were explained.
war-is-illegal.org - Emnid Umfrage: Sagt die US-Regierung die ganze Wahrheit über die Anschläge des 11. September?
'Loose Change'.......seriously? Lol. Made by a couple college kids in their mommys basement. Read Popular Mechanics.....ya know....with Engineers and scientists and PHDs oh my. And where are the thousands upon thousands who would have had to coordinate this plot in secret...in multiple leak filled govts? Not one person wants to get paid???? Get real.
Secondly, who in America gives a damn what the average German citizen thinks about 9/11? They were pretending they had no clue what happened at the concentration camps in their backyards 60 years ago too. Very bright and advanced that they are....chuckle.
I never saw "Loose Change". I just read articles and interviews of people who were present and know what I saw with my own eyes that morning. I am looking for reasonable information to explain some serious issues for which no reasonable explanation has been given. Mostly from the Pentagon and the building that was not hit or burning that collapsed. I have only heard of the nanothermite in this thread.
How could the plane that hit the Pentagon burn completely but the bodies in the plane were not burned and all were recovered. Still none of the parts of the plane were recovered except one piece that was laying on the ground in front of the building because all the rest of metal in the plane burned completely. Why did several of the experts interviewed at the Pentagon say they smelled the explosive cordite after the collision instead of jet fuel.
I watched that morning as one of the towers collapsed and commented at the time that it went down just like a demolition. There are now a lot of people wondering about this very thing. I have only heard experts saying the buildings should have toppled and not fallen like a demolition. Why did the building that was not hit collapse like a demolition days later though there was no fire.
I would like to be proven wrong and believe there was no conspiracy but there has not been any specific information presented to answer a number of troubling questions I and others have.
You have dismissed this issue without providing and substantial info.
Black 9/11: A Walk on the Dark Side
By wmw_admin on February 9, 2011
First in a series â?? by Mark H. Gaffney February 9, 2011
Black 9/11: A Walk on the Dark Side
"with Engineers and scientists and PHDs oh my."
um archetects and ENGINEERS for 9/11 truth...is FAR bigger than your popular mechanics...LULZ...
And Demolitions arent subject to only being detinated a certain way....they can be blown how every you want them to be...If you clearly watch building 1 and 2 Yes the top starts to crumble..but then keep watching...The rest of the building all of it at one time just suddenly drops...The top dosnt just fall off on to the street...It dosnt cause a chain reaction collapse where it slowly crumbles...no the top starts and as soon as the debri is coming down to cover up most of the rest...the whole thing even the bottom ALL at the same time just gives away///// LULZ
Oh and how about the FACT thats come out that the phone call that came from the plane...the guys wife that called him from the plane saying "there were muslims on board with box cutters" yadda yadda has come out on RECORD to show the call was 0 seconds long. How about the fact that Norad was ordered to stand down, How about the fact they were running exact same drills of the same thing the same day...and Norad gets confused? How about the fact that the day before Donald rumpsfeld gave a speech about how the Pentagon lost a trillion dollars somehow and they cant account for it....and then the missle that hit the pentagon Magicly took out the spot were the evidence for the missing money was LOL...How about the fact that over the course of bushes presidency we went from WE KNOW Sadam has wmd's to We thought he did LOL...wait What did Iraq have to do with any of this LULZ...Or how about the day before the towers came down There was a massive insurance policy tooken out on them by the owner lol...Seasoned Navy pilots whistle blowing that THEY couldnt even manuver a plane to hit the pentagon.. On and on and on... Why was building 7 never in the Investigation...Why is Donald Rumpsfeld telling people at meetings he hasnt even seen proof of it coming down...LOL < no seriously theres videos online of him saying this.. My spelling is not so good its the Internet.
I guess the hundreds of people who saw a passenger jet fly directly over their heads and crash into the pentagon were mistaken? Remember it flew directly over a freeway packed with morning commuters, there is no mistaking a passenger jet for a missle.
The Jews staged the whole thing? Oh man, it's getting REALLY deep....
I guess those phone calls from United 93 were all fabricated as well? You know the ones where people called family explaining exactly what was going on? How does loose change explain that?
Dean Witter managed security for the WTC, their chief of security was brought in after the first bombing attempt and predicted the next attack would probably come from the sky. NOTHING went on inside those buildings without his knowledge, NOTHING, no liquid explosives were planted on his watch. He died helping rescue people and a very well done documentary was done on his life not long after 9/11 and all these retarded conspiracy theories began to float about. Remember this was done shortly after 9/11 and is absolute proof to me that there was no conspiracy, give me a damn break.
There has never been a single recorded call to 911 or any other source that would verify what went on in the plane. But Bush managed to make people believe that a pregnant, bloned-haired, blued-eyed widows husband said "Let's Roll". The same way they were calling for Jessica Lynch to get the freakin CMH for being in a car wreck. It was done for public support, nothing else. If these calls had been real, they would have released the tapes and created a media firestorm. I am not saying that there as a conspiracy, but there was damn sure a lot of lying and manipulation of the public going on. They wanted that pipeline run through Afghanistan badly and the timing seems to be very poor.
There has never been a single recorded call to 911 or any other source that would verify what went on in the plane>>>>
What a load of crap, one of those calls was placed to No. Calif. by a passenger to a family member who said out of her own damn mouth she had a phone call with her son who was on that flight. It was all over the local news. I suppose Bush got to her and forced her to cry and lie about that huh? What tapes? Who in the hell tapes frantic phone calls from a family member who may have a few seconds to talk? WTF are you talking about? More then one call was placed by more then one passenger who at this time realized what was happening because FAMILY members were watching it unfold on LIVE freaking TV! What happened in PA is exactly what they stated happened. Do you keep a tape recorder by your phone for use in a split second?
"loose change" was exposed as a lie and has since "updated" itself twice to try to explain total speculation and lack of any fact whatsoever. DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE A PLANE WAS LANDED IN CLEVELAND, ALL PASSENGERS WERE DEBOARDED AND KILLED? Do you have any clue the logistics involved in pulling off a cover up of this scale? You're talking from the CEO's of AA and United down to the secuity screeners at Logan International(bwt, a lady friend knows one screener who let a hijacker through personally).
Demolition experts have proven there is no possible way those towers could have been a planned demolition because the quantity of explosives and wiring alone would take weeks and would be impossible to hide. The elevator shafts were filled with liquid explosives? HOW? They were IN USE at the time of the attack. You really think they brought in enough liquid explosives to load the elevator shafts without anyone knowing?
There were no Jews on any of those flights or in either of those buildings? DO PEOPLE REALLY BELIEVE THIS??? Has all reason simply been shoved out the door? The JEWS did this? I can't even believe what I'm reading, unfreakingbelievable. It doesn't matter how much you believe in a lie it doesn't make it true.
We have documented proof that the hijackers were practicing stalling mid air during training stimulations in where the instructors had to tell them to stop.
Bush had been President the better part of 8 months, do you REALLY think he could of pulled this off in that amount of time? OH wait, it was Cheney who'd been planning it since Bush 1 was beat by Clinton? <sigh>
Secondary devices are on Record being found inside the Oklahoma Federal building that suposedly was only taken down by the truck bomb...
Explosives find themselves into places when they want to be...they think I think that its just bush or chenny lulz...like All of the worlds top military industrial corporations, contractors, oil profitteers, the Opium trade in afganistan, the vein of lithium in afganistan, All whove made Trillions upon trillions in profit from all of this... This is Far bigger than you could ever think...such simple little sheep you are..
Secondary devices are on Record being found inside the Oklahoma Federal building that suposedly was only taken down by the truck bomb...
Explosives find themselves into places when they want to be...they think I think that its just bush or chenny lulz...like All of the worlds top military industrial corporations, contractors, oil profitteers, the Opium trade in afganistan, the vein of lithium in afganistan, All whove made Trillions upon trillions in profit from all of this... This is Far bigger than you could ever think...such simple little sheep you are..
>>>>>>
Well this sure explains it all! WOW, I'm impressed!
When you can't argue a position point by point just regurgitate the same speculation, 1/4 truths and assumption all the other conspiracy nuts do.
Timothy McVeigh is a government agent who took the fall for OKC? The reason for this would be?
Explosives don't "find" themselves anywhere, they are put in position deliberately by people.
'Loose Change'.......seriously? Lol. Made by a couple college kids in their mommys basement. Read Popular Mechanics.....ya know....with Engineers and scientists and PHDs oh my. And where are the thousands upon thousands who would have had to coordinate this plot in secret...in multiple leak filled govts? Not one person wants to get paid???? Get real.>>>>>>
EXACTLY! Imagine how many people would have to be involved just to cover up the secret landing in Cleveland and the massacare of all the passengers? Practically an entire airport staff plus the assasin's then what about all the extended family members of those passengers? Did they get paid off or killed off?
PD I never saw Loose Change or any of the other conspiracy films. The problem I have is with the CIA employees interviewed at the Pentagon after the building was hit. Several of the explosives experts interviewed by the mainstream media claimed that they smelled cordite (used in explosives) when they should have been smelling jet fuel. There is also the troubling problem of the entire plane burning so thoroughly that none of the plane was recovered except a small piece that landed outside and could not be identified as having coming from the plane that supposedly crashed. Yet all the bodies in the plane were recovered. I am just waiting for someone to come up with a viable explanation. Do human bodies burn at a higher temperature than all the metal used in the plane or what.
The other problem is the collapse of the third building that was not hit by any airliner. It also collapsed like a planned demolition but no explanation for that has been given. I agree that a conspiracy of this scale would be ridiculously hard to cover but where are the logical explanations.
When you can't argue a position point by point just regurgitate the same speculation, 1/4 truths and assumption all the other conspiracy nuts do. The same holds true for you. It looks like you don't believe this is possible. Why don't you present some actual information that backs up your statement. Maybe the research will make you question your position like it did mine. I would like to see you or anyone come up with some solid information to explain the unburned bodies, the presence of cordite or why the third building collapsed at all and why it went down like a demolition as well.
As far as the nanothermite and liquid molten metal I have not even read up on that. What I HAVE found though just leads to more questions for which there don't seem to be any satisfactory answers provided. Until these questions are reasonably answered the presence of a conspiracy cannot be eliminated.
Any losers in their moms basement can make a video about real shit. That dosn't make the facts false.