The Rolling Stones.
I cannot figure out why they have been around so long, they fuckin suck.
yeah, I agree AC/DC deserves to be on the list along with the Grateful Dead, too.
Printable View
The Rolling Stones.
I cannot figure out why they have been around so long, they fuckin suck.
yeah, I agree AC/DC deserves to be on the list along with the Grateful Dead, too.
imho no way are the beatles or pink floyd over rated, not today atleast. No one hypes them up like they used to, and there music is really good. So they both had a reason to be rated very highly, u cant over rate great bands like them, they both have changed the music industry.
Now a band like nirvana u could say is over rated but they too changed music.
When you think about over rated bands dont be ignorant becuase you dont like them or arent into there style, look at what thay have changed, there followingm and what they did for music.
A band like blink 182 is over rated, dumbass retards mmaking shitty music, but made mad money, while minipulating people into the "pop" scene. Not that its a bad scene but there are shitty bands out there that get way to much attention becuase they potray themselves to a certain group of people, look deeper then how you dislike there music and look at what there actually doing or did for the music community.
I'll agree with Jack, any band that puts choreography before actual talent. Pretty much any pop band out there today. You might not like AC/DC or the Beatles but at least they played there own instruments.
Jack,
Pink Floyd is soo overrated, there music isnt even "trippy" nor is it the best "chill out" music imo. If you think pink floyd is a good definition of psychedelic rock, you would be sadly mistaken if you listened to some real phych rock or post-rock. Sorry but idk where your from, the "hippys" at my school hype up floyd like crazy so i dont really know where you live that people overlook them. I wish i lived there. (im not tryin to start a thread war so dont take it like that)
99% of the bands that have produced music from the year 2000 and up.
Dude, your like 16. You don't even know what floyd did for music as a whole. You cant overrate a band that is a legend. It'd be like saying the Doors are overrated or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Metaphor
I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by dusto2k3
And I also think you can say the same for the Beatles.
As for truly overrated bands, yeah, I have to put Nirvana on the list... if it weren't for all the attention they got after Kurt Cobain's death, they would have been absolutely ECLIPSED by the talents of Soundgarden and Alice in Chains, who were FAR more worthy contemporaries.
Oh... and for solo artists... Geez, come ON, ELVIS FREAKIN' PRESLEY...
Nirvana and Tool are the most overrated, IMO
when i think overrated, i think of how many people act like they're gods, AND their own personification of themselves...
kurt didn't even want to be famous, he just played cuz he liked the music... all the fans are what made them popular... (and yes i realize he coulda turned the fame down, but who's gonna do that, in reality? that's like throwing away a winning lottery ticket)
i realize it's your opinions, and i don't try to argue with that (but you try to argue mine? lol....) but i don't see how you can say nirvana is overrated and not the beatles...
there are those who treat kurt and nirvana like they're god (not me btw) but there's far less of those fanatic fans than the beatles worshipers, and btw, it's just as easy for me ot say the beatles music sucks as it is for you to say it's great music...
however i have just thought of anohter, i think we all may be able to agree on...
MY NAME IS KIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIID ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCK.....
Uhhh Tool?Quote:
Originally Posted by OniEhtRedrum781
You might need to go into hiding for a while.