Printable View
I don't get what they were trying to say there. One joint will intoxicate you worse than 40 beers? Or maybe some other chemical ingestion? It can't be tar, which I thought the thread was about. There ain't tar in beer, is there. I'm kinda confused here. But that ain't a hard thing to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Synthesizer Man
I dunno, but I hate cleaning my bong and pipes. Just imagine scraping that tar from your lungs.
Their not radioactive but they have been exposed to radiation. As far as weed goes, They shouldnt even compare it to cigarettes. Weed smoke and Tobacco smoke are 2 different things. One joint isnt worse thain a pack of cigs or whatever you were told. But its certainly better than a pack of cigs.Quote:
Originally Posted by madeline
You cant compair joints to cigarettes any ways you dont know the potenecy of the weed, the paper it was rolled in, and how much weed, too many variables.
All I know is me and my bro ran out of stash. So now we are hittin da tar!!! Tar baby tar baby baby tar tar! :pimp: LOL
One has to do whatever it takes to maintain...Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta
ditto!!! tobacco , unlike cannabis, is grown with radioactive soils, and fed through the foilage with all kinds of growth hormones.Quote:
Originally Posted by WakingDream
Its not the tar that causes cancer. Its the radiation thats contained in the tar that causes cancer.
dai*ma:stoned: sf ca 94110
dont smoke blunts
In a study of 64000 people, heavy cannabis use over a long period of time does not increase the chances of any form of cancer.
Yea, but will it affect my lung capacity?Quote:
Originally Posted by LIP