im sure if i was a Lib you would be backing me...but since im not. You Bash.Quote:
Originally Posted by darkside
Printable View
im sure if i was a Lib you would be backing me...but since im not. You Bash.Quote:
Originally Posted by darkside
bong, i'm sure you would agree with me on many issues, but you seem to only want to talk about muslims and the middle east, while i'm more concerned with the problems facing american liberty at home. while the problem of islamic terrorism is very real, its not worth giving up our freedoms and privacy, because if we do, then the terrorists have succeeded and there is nothing left to fight for. why should we fight totalitarian regimes overseas when we're creating one over here. id rather die free than live in chains. bong, i hope we can keep these debates friendly and i hope to have many more. keep smokin:jointsmile:Quote:
Let me explain it to you.....
Bush is liberal- no, bush is a neoconservative, as are cheney, rove, rumsfeld, and the rest of his gang
Big spending- yes they do, and all your conservative republican friends in congress voted for his spending increases.
weak milatary we're weak because our troops are stretched too far and are stuck policing a civil war in a country we shouldnt be in. thanks neocons
weak borders-bush is weak. period
Clinton was more conservitive than bush
Socialist...like most of you-i'm not socialist, i'm a libertarian
no borders-i'm for better controls of borders, but i'm against this rediculous fence, i mean, cmon.
goverment healthcare-i do not support gov healthcare.
big goverment programs-i do not support big gov. it is my opinion that the sole purpose of government should be to protect the natural rights of man, not to abridge them.
talking with enemy....lets all get along why not? keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
its all about the goverment...its there fault..its not there fault....please- governments should be held accountable for their actions.
Liberal: read it for yourself then decide if all the liberal bashing on these sites are accurate: Merriam Websters definition of liberal: 1:Of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts; 2: Generous-Bountiful; 3: Not literal; 4: Not narrow in judgement or opinion; Also, : not orthodox; 5: Not conservative. I believe these to be the traits of a thinking person. BTW the definition of conservative is the opposite, like: narrow minded, stingy, etc!
There also seems to be a certain unique quality to extremist American liberalism, as compared to other forms. Not to mention most people don't seem to understand the difference between reform liberalism and classical liberalism. The liberalism that most conservatives hate and identify as all liberalism, is the reform brand. Classical liberalism, IMHO, seems a much more sensible ideology and encompasses qualities from the current right and left spectrum.