More propaganda

I thought this was funny when they were explaining how dangerous driving high is.

"According to a study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, a driver under the influence of alcohol and marijuana took an additional 46 yardsâ??almost half the length of a football fieldâ??to react to other drivers' changes. (Marijuana and Alcohol Combined Increase Impairment, NHTSA, June, 1999)."

Notice the test subject was drunk and stoned. Perhaps it was more the alcohol impacting his poor driving.

I drove a lot less drunk than stoned, yet I've been pulled over twice drunk (never got a DUI), yet have never been pulled over stoned. I suppose it suggests I drive good enough high.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tesupo

Look at this garbage, really upsets me on how they are now attacking medicinal marijuana users.

http://www.justthinktwice.com/stumbleweed/home.html

Enjoy

why don't they go and talk about Dr. Pat giving opiate painkillers out and how they don't cause a problem in this country.

---

The first word I read after clicking the "read more link" is "the DEA". Ha! What a shocker there. Why is it that there propoganda is more ridiculous than anyone else's? All of their "facts" could be debunked instantly. Even a child would be able to make recognization of how blown out of proportion they've turned this into, even if it were true.:mad:

hmmm.. I could have sworn I made a reply to this thread earlier, and now I don't see it here. Maybe I just forgot to hit the submit button or something.. lol.

What I basically said was I was seriously considering making the website I mentioned earlier now. I could probably make the website in a matter of weeks. You guys think that would actually be safe though to go against government-funded websites in that fashion?

Also, since when do people die FIVE DAYS after taking a drug (Ecstacy, at that)? Anyone read that story? It sounded like utter bullshit all the way through.