In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
wow what ever happened to being a libatarian? lol
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebgirl420
wow what ever happened to being a libatarian? lol
libation \ly-BAY-shun\, noun:
1. The act of pouring a liquid (usually wine) either on the ground or on a victim in sacrifice to some deity; also, the wine or liquid thus poured out.
2. A beverage, especially an alcoholic beverage.
3. An act or instance of drinking.
:what:
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
you know whats more dangerous then all?
A professional capitalist that doubles as a ninja in his free time.
OH and dont fuck with him, he's a professional memetic engineer.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Um, I'm sorry, but the right-wingers are just as dangerous as the left-wingers on this issue.
Take for example, the patriot act (the treasonous act), which all but renders our Bill of Rights meaningless.
Or how about all these security measures in our airports, enacted by the "conservatives". What have they done to increase our safety? Not a damn thing. All they've done is force the airlines to increase prices to cover the costs of the measures, and cause us more inconviences. Even Ann Coulter recognizes that!
Sorry, but the fact remains that terrorist attacks are one of the least likely ways for you to be hurt. They only serve one purpose : to inflict terror. And when we let our society become parylyzed by them, we only give into them. Here's some numbers for you:
1 in 88,000 of dying in a terrorist attack
1 in 55,928 of death by lightening
1 in 20,605 in your clothes igniting
1 in 10,455 of dying in your bathtub
1 in 10,010 by falling from a ladder or scaffolding
1 in 9,396 due to excessive heat
1 in 8,389 due to excessive cold
1 in 7,972 in a drowning accident
1 in 6,842 in a railway accident.
1 in 197 of dying in a homicide
1 in 299 of dying in an assault from a firearm
1 in 5,330 of dying in an assault by hanging or strangulation
1 in 207,261 in operations of war.
Of course, I have a solution that conservatives can feel comfortable with, and would also drastically reduce terrorism. Have everyone carry a concealed pistol :)
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanguinekane
Sure, though I'm going to have to disagree with almost all of it, as well as many of the comments in this thread. To start of with, this article is obviously aimed at working up support amongst the already converted, and not at actually trying to intiate a dialogue between opposing viewpoints. Not that there is anything wrong with writing something to preach to the faithful, but by the same token, don't expect it to convince a great many new people that your specific political opinion is the "correct" one.
Feder's article is simply full of hyperbole and insults, which he is free to write as much as he wants, but at the same time, they do not engender a sense of openness and willingness to actually talk about these issues. It seems that Feder would rather just yell and insult people with a different opinion than his.
First time I looked at this thread, I stopped reading the article right there (though I obviously read it all the way through a little later). The above quote is an excellent example on how to not start an intelligent an reasoned debate, by insulting the mental capacity of an entire political party which probably represents the views of roughly half the electorate.
Indeed, it is an example of what has actually been causing the most discord and strife within this country since even before 9/11, and certainly since after then as well. The extreme partisanship that has only been fueled by pundits such as Feder, Coulter, Moore, Churchill, O'reily and others has done more to divide and turn the population against each other than the terrorists ever did. In a time when we should all be expressing our ideas equally, rationally discussing and debating those ideas, and then blending the best points from all sides of the political spectrum, we are instead pointing at each other and shrilly labeling each other as terrorist-supporters, fascists, Christo-Nazis, or liberal traitors.
Yes, of course there are people in this country who actually support the terrorists, and want to see them win. However, to say that everyone on one side of the political spectrum wants this country destroyed, and that they are actively (or even passively) giving help and assistance to the terrorists is not only ludicrous and unfounded, it is simply wrong.
Howdy sanguine,
Thanx for yer reply,sorry I didn't see it until now.
While you may be right in that the article was written mainly for the already-converted,it still needs to be pointed out,just how contrary the goals are of the Left,in securing our country and fighting the terrorists and rogue regimes. It needs to be demonstrated and high-lighted,that the Left has basically granted moral equivalancey to the terrorists and rogue regimes,the Left even continues to try and grant the terrorists,Constitutional rights and Geneva rights,when in fact,they are neither American citizens,except in a few cases,and that they are non-uniformed combatants.
I'll grant ya,that this country is very divided,because of articles that are distinctly biased,and pundits and politicians and activists,it's coming from both sides. However,at least my side--ain't willing to compromise with Evil,we ain't willing to dance with the devil..and we dang sure don't make excuses and apologies,for the despicable actions of the terrorists and rogue regimes.
So I will continue to highlight the fact,that the 5th column efforts are coming from the Left ..and that it's increasing..and just like in Vietnam,the 5th column wants us to abandon Iraq and Israel and once again,be a major part of the reason why millions of folks may die..when the ME is turned over to Iran and Syria.
I'm still wondering why you were the only one in the "Lottery" thread,that saw a need for at least a fortified compound..? It means that ya got some common sense in there,somewhere..lol.
Have a good one ...
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
and how exactly does no property rights and the pan american union fit in with all this new freedom we have torog?
destroying property rights and chucking our sovereignty (among an endless list of how the country's basically gone) are probably two of the most anti-american things that can be done...how exactly is that 'conservative' and 'freedom'?
setting up a dictatorship is freedom?
have you ever even read the constitution?
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by pisshead
and how exactly does no property rights and the pan american union fit in with all this new freedom we have torog?
destroying property rights and chucking our sovereignty (among an endless list of how the country's basically gone) are probably two of the most anti-american things that can be done...how exactly is that 'conservative' and 'freedom'?
setting up a dictatorship is freedom?
have you ever even read the constitution?
Have you ever came up with one good idea? Or do you just Bitch?
NEVER ONE Idea pissy, not one.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torog
It needs to be demonstrated and high-lighted,that the Left has basically granted moral equivalancey to the terrorists and rogue regimes,the Left even continues to try and grant the terrorists,Constitutional rights and Geneva rights,when in fact,they are neither American citizens,except in a few cases,and that they are non-uniformed combatants.
Is it so much to ask that these enemy combatants are at least charged with some sort of offense? That they be given a reason why they are being held in Guantanamo Bay for 5 years? Also, that they not be tortured. When the fuck did torture become OK in this country?
George Bush claims that one of the reasons we took Iraq is because Saddam had a nasty habit of torturing folks. Now we do it for him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torog
I'll grant ya,that this country is very divided,because of articles that are distinctly biased,and pundits and politicians and activists,it's coming from both sides. However,at least my side--ain't willing to compromise with Evil,we ain't willing to dance with the devil..and we dang sure don't make excuses and apologies,for the despicable actions of the terrorists and rogue regimes.
Who the hell apologizes for terrorists? You've been listening to too much conservative talk radio. I was all for the invasion of Afganistan. In fact, I think we should have sent everything we had to that place and SHUT DOWN the border. No terrorists or bombs in or out.
But instead we invaded Iraq, did not secure the border or weapons, and encouraged a whole new generation of America-hating Arabs. Not to mention causing the death of a hundred thousand innocent Iraqis. Plus the death of a few thousand soldiers. Not to mention the soldiers who survived with severe handicaps.
We all want the same things. We want to be safe, and not have to worry that terrorists are going to murder us. It's just that half of the country thinks the way to do this is to invade a country that had nothing to do with this conflict.
The invasion of Iraq has made the world a more dangerous place.
If you disagree, then open your eyes.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornelius
Is it so much to ask that these enemy combatants are at least charged with some sort of offense? That they be given a reason why they are being held in Guantanamo Bay for 5 years? Also, that they not be tortured. When the fuck did torture become OK in this country?
George Bush claims that one of the reasons we took Iraq is because Saddam had a nasty habit of torturing folks. Now we do it for him.
Who the hell apologizes for terrorists? You've been listening to too much conservative talk radio. I was all for the invasion of Afganistan. In fact, I think we should have sent everything we had to that place and SHUT DOWN the border. No terrorists or bombs in or out.
But instead we invaded Iraq, did not secure the border or weapons, and encouraged a whole new generation of America-hating Arabs. Not to mention causing the death of a hundred thousand innocent Iraqis. Plus the death of a few thousand soldiers. Not to mention the soldiers who survived with severe handicaps.
We all want the same things. We want to be safe, and not have to worry that terrorists are going to murder us. It's just that half of the country thinks the way to do this is to invade a country that had nothing to do with this conflict.
The invasion of Iraq has made the world a more dangerous place.
If you disagree, then open your eyes.
this is why we invaded Iraq.........
Have you ever had a ZIT?
Think of afganistan on One side ........IE, one finger....
Think Of Iraq on the other side..........IE other Finger
Think of IRAN like a ZIT we need to POP...... WE Have perfect POPPPING position.
I hope we get some on the mirror.........:thumbsup:
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bong30
this is why we invaded Iraq.........
Have you ever had a ZIT?
Think of afganistan on One side ........IE, one finger....
Think Of Iraq on the other side..........IE other Finger
Think of IRAN like a ZIT we need to POP...... WE Have perfect POPPPING position.
I hope we get some on the mirror.........:thumbsup:
and you wonder why they might hate that? there are PEOPLE DIEING
killing human life and makeing people suffer brings more hate toward YOU. How does killing people who did nothing help anything? You are calling for more reasons for them to hate you. look how brain washed you are! How Sick.
