The 9/11 Chronicles: Destroying a Crime Scene

pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...

http://www.loosechange911.com/

"Dedicated to exposing the Lies, Distortions, and Myths in the Movie Loose Change", Loose Change debunking:
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/

http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html


National Institute of Standards and Technology

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://www.historyofjihad.org/future.html

"Dedicated to exposing the Lies, Distortions, and Myths in the Loose Breukelen advocaat" Breukelen debunking:

http://home.comcast.net/~tpochmara/images/retard.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Euphoric

"Dedicated to exposing the Lies, Distortions, and Myths in the Loose Breukelen advocaat" Breukelen debunking:

http://home.comcast.net/~tpochmara/images/retard.jpg

---

Maybe youâ??re "Eurphoric", but you have a long way to go to learn critical thinking, along with the young men that made Loose Change. I've never heard one person in New York City express those conspricacy theories, and I've been there on 9/11, and since. You can call people names, just like the makers of Loose Change, Jason Bermas and Dylan Avery, did in a debate with David Dunbar and Jim Meigs of Popular Mechanics - but it doesn't help your case one bit. It's just a sign of immaturity. Those young men came off like total losers.


9/11 Debate: Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"

The Video is on this webpage. It's about 40 minutes:
http://www.democracynow.org/article..../09/11/1345203

If the link above does not work, here it is:

http://www.democracynow.org/article..../09/11/1345203

Ya can't prove a negative. If the conspiracy dudes think they have a better theory, it's up to them to provide the evidence to substantiate their theory. The problem they have, of course, is that there is no evidence to substantiate their theories, which does leave them in a bit of a bind.

There are apparently a fair number of people who can't differentiate between real evidence and the stuff that pours out of Alex Jones' mouth, however. Those people are his target audience of course, as they make him the most money. I don't really blame him. I mean, if I could make up stuff and get rich off the ignorance of others, I'd probably do it too. Well, maybe not, but I'd at least consider it, if the amount of money was large enough.

BTW, there were airplane parts found at the Pentagon. Not to mention many witnesses who saw the plane come in, hit the ground, and then plow into the side of the building. But who knows, maybe some kind of mysterious rays were used on the witnesses to make them just THINK they saw a big plane. Or maybe, just maybe, they saw a plane because there was one. That'd kind of explain the plane parts found scattered around the area too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shilling

Where was NORAD for two hours?
Conducting cold war war games, like they always do

Why did it take Bush over 15 minutes to get up off his kindergarten chair?
Because he's stupid and needed time to figure out he was the dude in charge

What happened to the Pentagon Missile Defence System?
Nothing, they track missles not planes

What happened to the remains of the plane that hit the pentagon?
The materials were salvaged, reprocessed and given to Haliburton and Bechtel

How did some of the "alleged" bombers turn up alive in the middle east?
They were wrongly alleged?

The onus is now on the Bush administration to prove that they DIDN'T do it, and it WAS in fact some jihadist biyaches who did it.
Fuck, does anyone else know about this? This is huge!

---

Sorry, couldn't resist.