Nope, I like my ant eatter. :)
Printable View
Nope, I like my ant eatter. :)
No Im not!
Thats part of my dick! Why the fuck would I cut it off!? I know how to wash my cock!
Breukelen Advocaat, I don't like havin this circumcision argument because its pretty pointless to argue who's penis is better, but a couple things...
First of all, its not MUTILATION and it isnt BAD. I don't know where you got the information of trauma being caused by it, for infant nerves are very weak and circumcision really isnt that much pain to them, or else they would use anesthetics.
Where did you get info stating women prefer uncircumsized? I just did a search, all i find are women prefering circumsized penises because they look better/cleaner/dont smell as bad/feel better(this makes sense since theres more surface area rubbing in the vaginal walls with a circumsized penis for theres no foreskin acting as a sleeve. I don't know where you got that "gliding" thing from)
And as for hygene, studies have shown that uncircumcized penises are much less hygenic and succeptible to urinary tract defection, penile cancer, unretractable foreskin etc.
Again, I'm not saying one is better than the other, I'm just clearing up some statements you made such as circumcision being bad, a form of genital mutilation, traumatizing, and something women dislike when compared to uncircumcized.
Don't even think about taking a knife and going anywhere near there!!!!
I've heard both those arguements before. Personally I'm uncircumsized, but as for it being uncleanly, take 15 seconds in the shower to pull it back and wash it and your set, and if you don't shower daily... well, to each his own.:p
And I dunno about you guys, but me, and anyone else I've talked about it to, retracts upon erection... so this buisness about it being better? Isn't it the same thing?
Well, unless it's too tight, but you grow out of that in most cases. I've talked to chicks who both prefer one or the other, but if your using a condom, once again... same diff?
The only thing about circumcision I don't like is the actual cutting... *cringe* Other than that, I'd be happy either way, sex is sex.
I have three little boys, all are circumsized....I would never cause intentional harm, or mutilate my babies...i just know what all the girls say about the uncircumsized guys.... calling them rumpleforeskin, dick cheese, etc...sorry to all the guys rocking the turtle neckQuote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
youre right, it is a culture thing, why would I want to subject my boys to being teased because they dont look like all the other little boys....penises for boys can be as much a source of pain, as weight is for girls. one of the most important things you can do for your child is to give them a sense of acceptance and normalcy...as for trauma....well, I would say the pain of being born would be more traumatic then the circumcision...that is, if you actually believe it causes trauma...
The good news is that the rate of circumcisions in the U.S. has gone down dramatically in the past two decades.
Basically, a boy (or girl) should be allowed to have his body as nature intended, until they reach the legal age of consent and are able to decide for them selves. NOBODY has the right to mutilate them before that time.
This started as a sacrifice to god, and has also been used, among other things, to stop masturbation, prevent insanity, and other false claims.
These websites should answer all of the questions as to why it should be banned:
http://www.nocirc.org/
http://www.icgi.org/
Nearly Half of American Boys Escape the Knife
published on Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:51:32 -0500
Today's Parents Say "No" to Circumcision -- The U.S. circumcision rate declined 11.4% over two years, according to figures just released by the National Center for Health Statistics, from 63.1% in 2001 to 55.9% in 2003, following a steady, twenty-five year decline. At this rate, in just 12 years, the US will join other English-speaking countries in abandoning circumcision. Medicalized, mass circumcision of infants is a uniquely English-speaking phenomenon. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom formerly circumcised the majority of infant boys, but have either abandoned the practice, or reduced the rate to about 1 in 10. The United States medical community stands alone is profiting from a non-therapeutic, unnecessary procedure performed on non-consenting minors. The largest decline was in western states where the rate dropped 23%; and seven out of ten boys remained genitally intact. In 2003, 45% of American newborn males left the hospital intact, up from 37% in 2001. Since 1996, it has been illegal to circumcise girls in the US, but thousands are still at risk every year. The law itself is legally questionable because it lacks equal protection, which the Constitution makes mandatory.
Declaration of the First International
Symposium on Circumcision
Adopted March 3, 1989
Anaheim, California
We recognize the inherent right of all human beings to an intact body. Without religious or racial prejudice, we affirm this basic human right.
We recognize that the foreskin, clitoris and labia are normal, functional body parts.
Parents and/or guardians do not have the right to consent to the surgical removal or modification of their children's normal genitalia.
Physicians and other health*care providers have a responsibility to refuse to remove or mutilate normal body parts.
The only persons who may consent to medically unnecessary procedures upon themselves are the individuals who have reached the age of consent (adulthood), and then only after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of the procedure.
We categorically state that circumcision has unrecognized victims.
In view of the serious physical and psychological consequences that we have witnessed in victims of circumcision, we hereby oppose the performance of a single additional unnecessary foreskin, clitoral, or labial amputation procedure.
We oppose any further studies which involve the performance of the circumcision procedure upon unconsenting minors. We support any further studies which involve identification of the effects of circumcision.
Physicians and other health*care providers do have a responsibility to teach hygiene and the care of normal body parts and explain their normal anatomical and physiological development and function throughout life.
We place the medical community on notice that it is being held accountable for misconstruing the scientific database available on human circumcision in the world today.
Physicians who practice routine circumcisions are violating the first maxim of medical practice, "Primum Non Nocere," "First, Do No Harm," and anyone practicing genital mutilation is violating Article V of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment..."
Do you belong to a nudist club? If not, I cannot picture little boys pulling their penis' out in front of little girls. Unless, of course, you are talking about "adult" women - many of whom have no idea of what they are talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by muncheemama
With almost half of American boys now escaping the knife, I'd certainly think that the uncircomsized ones will feel more than "normal" to be intact. Then, these women and girls that hate foreskins will have little choice when it comes to their preference for men that have had their penis' chopped up.
im uncut and i wouldnt change it ever
Damn you! who are you to advocate stopping a practice that gives women good penises!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
seriously, you have shit to talk about everything on here...and as the old saying goes....opinions are like assholes, everyones got one, and they all stink....except for mine of course
all i know is that my children are happy, well adjusted and they have not asked where their foreskin went.... as a matter of fact....my husband wanted it to be done for our boys... and as a man, i guess he would know better than you...