Bush is No Conservative

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Euphoric

You defend Bush and his cronies, rag on the founding fathers and insult anyone against the flow of your mainstream media. Sounds to me like youre the one being led around to me :p

No, I just insult dumb fuckers that yell cop because of my beliefs.....or aren't people suppose to have and express different beliefs without fear of a "witchhunt", which by calling a person a cop with no type of proof is just that. Postman, Mfactor, eg.....all have different beliefs but they don't resort to this type of crap, and likewise, I don't with them.

Actively supporting bush is a smack in the face to the cannabis culture. Why don't you spend your energy supporting something that will lead to drug policy reform? The republicans/conservatives are pushing the drug war harder than any one else! And youre on a cannabis board supporting your supressors, almost unconciously..then accusing others of being bitches? Its a contradiction and i thought i would point that out to everyone. :cool:

---

For your info, the Dems created the largest increase to the "war on drugs" budget than ANY republican president. That is one part of a much larger political policy.....I'm still glad as hell that ol' Kerry didn't make it!

By the way, just got done sittin' a lil' jail time for growing and I've still got 170 hours of community service left. I sure the fuck don't blame it on the current president and I could really give a crap less of the party....it's an old law!

"Actively supporting bush"........LOL.....just as often as I can!:thumbsup:

Hey its psycho's head:stoned: -------LMAO

HmMm well kerry was expected to give us some slack on the drug war

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/351/hempfest.shtml
http://www.hightimes.com/ht/news/con...?aid=4&bid=278


Nixon was a republican

Which presidency was responsible for the largest drug war spending increase?

Drug Control Strategy: More $, more enforcement, more TV ads
I am pleased to formally release our National Drug Control Strategy. Itâ??s not a short-term plan designed to produce short-lived results; it is a comprehensive long-term strategy. It has more money for drug testing and treatment. It has better drug-law enforcement in our communities and better drug control on our borders. It has better anti-drug education for young people. Our plan is backed by the largest anti-drug budget ever-nearly $18 billion.....Al Gore
http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Al_Gore_Drugs.htm

Neither one of our current "legitimate choices" for office has the balls to do whats right. The right had alchohal and tobacco saying no and the left is so fuckin' concerned for my health they don't want it either.

It'll be the same as it was for booze....when Canada eases up and theres no way to control the product from reaching us.
When enough people have had enough because either themselves or loved ones were fucked by the laws.
Maybe SOME paid off fat ass politition will get his pockets lined by a pro-marijuana group and laws will change.

Show me where US troops killed tens of thousands of Civilians....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

....when Canada eases up and theres no way to control the product from reaching us.

Maybe SOME paid off fat ass politition will get his pockets lined by a pro-marijuana group and laws will change.

---

You honestly think Canada will ease up? Since the Conservatives got
elected (albiet a minority)?

If Marc Emery pumped so much of his seed money into the legalization movement, why didn't he buy the right politician instead as you are suggesting? Wouldn't that be avoiding the middle man?

And, pyscho, thanks for the comments earlier.:thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mfactor420

You honestly think Canada will ease up? Since the Conservatives got
elected (albiet a minority)?

Honestly don't know enough about Canadian politics to make a judgement.....just a hope I guess!

If Marc Emery pumped so much of his seed money into the legalization movement, why didn't he buy the right politician instead as you are suggesting? Wouldn't that be avoiding the middle man?

I meant that statement purely for the U.S. political system....palms that are greased work much quicker in our congress and senate it seems.

And, pyscho, thanks for the comments earlier.:thumbsup:

---

Hey, no prob! I'll sit down and party with anyone as far as that's concerned. What the hell, a good debate over bongs and drinks can be interesting. Call me what you want to a point but cop, molestor, rapist.....I don't fuckin' think so! There is a line of respect for everyone and that's mine!

Have a good one bro!:thumbsup:

Hey psycho, Many Canadians view PM Stephen Harper as Bushit's ass kisser. In the past a couple of Liberal MP's and a few other noted politicians trashed Busit rather harshly. (We have free speach up here too, just ask Don Cherry)

If Stephen Harper is Bushit's ass kisser, he will advance the war on drugs. He has already emphatically stated the Conservatives will not reintroduce the legalization bill the Liberals were trying to pass the last couple of years. Further, Harper has insisted that there be mandatory jail time even for smoking a joint.

Canada Mexico and USA are about to meet or just met about a number of cross border issues and Canada's prime topic is soft wood lumber. USA will probably respond with, "give us Marc Emery".

Canadian politics is no different when it comes to greasing palms. Here it's called "patronage". Anyway, as you stated, it still leaves me wondering why Marc Emery didn't grease a few American politician's palms. Maybe he did and there is a conspiracy to cover it up.:D