Originally Posted by nb313
from a discussion on wikipedia(subject:drug test ) where its mainly forensic toxilogist writing. they had this to say:
:In truth, nobody really knows whether bodyfat levels effect drug test results, but most professionals are willing to admit they may, but in a minor way. I would guess that if a person went long enough without the drug to get to some kind of baseline THC level - so that the only THC left in the body was leeching from existing fat - that level would be well below the detectable level. Then again, it's just a guess. --[[User:CKelly|ZZYZX]] 09:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Still this is just hearsay since there is no recearch.
But this is prropably a better answer than "joe doe" saying this or that is a fact. I have lately discovered that most of the info ppl here get is way off.
As an example i have seen many saying that thc can be discovered in urin samples up to 30 days after use. THIS IS JUST NOT CORRECT AND I HAVE THE RESEARCH TO BACK IT UP. go to wikipedia(Drug test) and check the reference section. (and its also available from NORML)
for heavy users its MAX 10 days, and then just in heavy/prequent users! But maybe a dillution salesman would like you to think otherwise. If they say 30 days and most ppl drop pot for like 7 days, use their substance and pass, they have created a illusion that their stuff work.
But what do i know, check the facts and remember that what we learnt yesterday might be wrong today, especially on a subject like this where there is so many professional propaganda writers*mumbles "darn DEA"*.
