Printable View
What interests me is that some of these so called "christians" would happily slaughter other people who are considered christian. Not to mention the mass genocide that would occor if these "christians" ever came to control this country.
This is freaky shit.
BTW Did Bush really say that God told him to strike al Queda and Saddam?
Don't we as a society usually react to people who talk to God by slapping the straight jacket on em and pumping em full of antipsycotics?
Man we the people really dropped the ball on that one.
Yup LordBush really said God told him to strike at Al CIA da, saddamn. He also said this
God loves you, and I love you. And you can count on both of us as a powerful message that people who wonder about their future can hear. It's a powerful message. And it's a message that a lot of people can spread."
He has so many God-Jesus qoutes I was thinking Pat Robertson became prez...
But LordBush really worships Satan & owls and has gay sex party in the woods of Calif( not flaming any1 who practice gay sex in the woods of cali)... But shhhh his followers(Bushites) cant believe that because Foxnews has not told them yet.
The problem is not that the nut cases are allowed to express there opinions, but rather that they get to set policy. The "lunatic fringe" is in control of 10,000 nucleur weapons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
It would been in our best interest to drop a few (nuclear weapons) on the mountains of Afghanistan on 9/12/01 - and when the U.N., press, etc. demanded an explanation, we denied it. THAT would have thrown a whole new perspective on the U.S.Quote:
Originally Posted by andruejaysin
The only way to stop Muslim extremist agression is to throw out the rules. NO more "Christian" patterns of stupidity and money-making deals with the Middle East until they clean up their back yards. If I were president, I would issue a new manifesto that clearly outlines the rules - and if you break them, you pay dearly.
I grew up "in the streets" - NOT in some rich community like every president we've had for many administrations. Somebody hits you, you hit them back NUMEROUS times until they are lyning in the gutter bleeding.
The Al Quada think that they are striking fear in us because we think that they are "crazy" with their suicide attacks. We MUST "out-crazy" them, or die. Kicking the living, fucking, shit out of people is the best deterrent to future agression.
DAMN....Super Neo-con to the rescue!!! LOL!! j/kQuote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
Know where your comin' from but just a lil' on the harsh side....have a good one! :thumbsup:
Itâ??s a source of constant amazement to me how homophobic these people are. What are they afraid of?
Breukelen advocaat; you swallow every lie youâ??re told. Does it never cross your mind that you just might have been suckered?
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
Quote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
I see what you're saying but using aggression creates more aggresion and more pissed off people, notice that they caused more problems by invading Iraq. Afgahnsitan was alrite but Iraq was over the line....weapons of mass distruction. where? In georges imagination.
If we had completely knocked out Afghanistan, with gusto, we wouldn't have had much to worry about with Iraq. I have never been a big supportor of the Iraq war, and even less so today.Quote:
Originally Posted by dopesmoker
Self-defense and retaliation is different from needless agression. We helped Afghanistan, and they allowed a crazed religious group to use the country as a base for training and harboring people dedicated to killing all of us. One of the (many) grudges that they held against us was that we did not provide ground troops to fight the Soviet occupation. We armed them, trained them, and gave the country millions every year - but that apparently didn't satisfy these opium-growing animals.
The mistakes of Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr. were not the beginning of the problems, but it's not a coincidence that they were all "religous". They would have been better off to just let the Soviets have that place (Afghanistan). Their fear of the "godless commies" was the deciding factor in supporting people that would eventually become the al quida and taliban. I'd rather have commies as adversaries, because they are RATIONAL - unlike the religious nuts like bin laden, khomeni (formerly of Iran), etc.
[QUOTE=bonton]Breukelen advocaat; you swallow every lie youâ??re told. Does it never cross your mind that you just might have been suckered?QUOTE]
I KNOW that I've been "suckered": EVERYBODY has been at one time or another - especially regarding politics. I'm not going to do anything to somebody that owes me a little money, but you've got loudmouth punks on this board who brag about planning to go apeshit over a hundred bucks that their friend owes them. As we say where I come from, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me".
I do not like Bill O'Reilly, but I don't think that he is a "nazi", or anything like that. The same goes for Bush, and anybody would be a fool to think that he would risk his very life and/or liberty to take part in a plan that killed three thousand civilians and rescue workers on 9/11.
I wouldn't have felt any differently about the attack(s) had I not seen it, but I was there in lower NYC on 9/11. This was not the first time, because I was across the street from the WTC when the bombing in 1993 occurred. I'm getting a LITTLE fucking sick and tired of these raghead bastards killing my neighbors, and other innocent people.
Our "leaders", such as Jimmy "Howdy Doody" Carter, Ronald ("star wars", "evil empire", etc.) Reagan, George ("I'm not sure that atheists should be citizens") Bush Sr., his son GWB, Blair, and others are not, to say the least, totally in touch with reality. I know that, so don't think that everything is getting by me. Their stupidity is a matter of degrees - but to label them as completely evil is going too far.
I do NOT consider myself as "conservative", but do believe in justice and the preservation of our democracy and freedoms. If we have to bite the bullet for a time to be safer, then I will comply - as I do every day without crying about it. Despite what your press tells you, those of us in New York, Washington, etc., do not live in fear - at least not any more than in citizens in London after the train bombings.
The "War on Terror" has been working well enough so far, but I would rather that we had pattern-bombed, or nuked, Afghanistan right away to show them that we're not playing any more games. I don't want to "convert" these people to christinsanity, democratic capitalism, or anything else: I just want them to behave, so that we don't have to kill them all. And THAT is the position that the leaders of the Free World should have hammered home - and actions speak louder than word, especially after attacks such as 2005 London and 2001 Washington and New York. Once they've had fair warning, and STILL allow these barbaric actions, then all bets are off.
Just my :twocents: