Ack, I meant to say 1000w. My stupid fingers sometimes don't hit the key fully, stupid laptop keyboards. I'm used to my Model M.Quote:
Originally Posted by means2010
Apologies.
Printable View
Ack, I meant to say 1000w. My stupid fingers sometimes don't hit the key fully, stupid laptop keyboards. I'm used to my Model M.Quote:
Originally Posted by means2010
Apologies.
From what stra8toutaweed said,he got really good results from just led in veg stage then a combo of 2-150 watt leds and 1- 600 watt hps in flowering,he got some really good results,sounds like a combo of led and hps is the way to go
you can flower w/LED alone but you better have the right spectral balance or flowering sucks which i why you see so many LED threads start but none finish...i think mine is one of the few...so depending on needs, power constraints and personal goals a combination of LED/HPS is the easiest formula for success...all LED takes more skill :jointsmile:
u said u flowered with a 600 watt hps with 2-150 watt leds on each side,how bout just a single 300 watt led for flowering,do u thinki that would be enough lighting for flowering and growing some nice buds,did u go hydro or soil?
So back to the OP's question, what is the best LED combo? I have not yet bought any lights, and I want to do it right from a cost-to-yield-to-discretion basis. So what do I buy?
For you experienced guys...stra8outtaWeed and khyberkitsune...if you had, say, $1000 to buy lights and wanted to stay discrete, like the OP says (IOW, not throw off a ginormous thermal bloom and peg the electricity meter), what would you buy, knowing what you know now?
Thanks! :)
I'd buy a solid 300w panel using the newest single-emitter 3w diodes, with a proper tri-band blend and balance. That 300w alone would rock my current setup with 36 constantly flowering plants.Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneMeadow
Thanks...can you recommend a make and model that fits your criteria? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by khyberkitsune
I can't do that without being biased towards my own equipment, I'm sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneMeadow
Not to mention, what I have specced isn't in production, yet.
Okay...that's understandable.Quote:
Originally Posted by khyberkitsune
Oops...awkwaaaaarrdd! :DQuote:
Not to mention, what I have specced isn't in production, yet.
This is very interesting information...thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by stra8outtaWeed
1) 2x150w LEDs + 1 600w HPS = 900w: 585/900 = .65 gm per watt yield.
2) 600w HPS alone: 340/600 = .57 gm per watt.
3) 1000w HPS alone: 422.5/1000 = .42 gm per watt.
4) 450w LED alone: 345/450 = .77 gm per watt.
So, LEDs are most efficient, but it's also clear that the more light you throw down on a given area the better. Presumably, right up to the point where you can no longer control the temperature, right?
Thanks again...really good stuff!