New regs proposed for NM Cannabis Program

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blackhash

If >>you yourself<< travelled to Afghanistan/India/The Kush Region of the middle East and sampled the wares/sourced the seed I would totally agree
with your statement.

However, if you are speaking to Amsterdam/etc as having better genetics than here in the US I would not agree with such a statement. There are some top-quality genetics in Europe, no doubt, but these days the US has everything Europe has and more and there is no need to source seeds from outside the US anymore. (risking Customs detection/etc)

that's my opinion, anyway. As always, YMMV.

---

Very True Hash. Most of the popular strains you see in Amsterdam were actually American west coast strains to begin with.,
I believe these are some of the strains taken to to the Netherlands, from the USA as clones or seed. Not all of course.
Skunk #1
Northern lights
Big bud,.. I do not believe you can find a true Big Bud in Amsterdam?
Afghani #1
Cali orange
Hawaiian indicia
Early girl.
Northern lights
The Dutch seed companies have come up with some mind bending strains and done good with what they got but the original "fine blended" genetics came from the pacific northwest Particularly the Humboldt area and Hawaii, not all, but the majority.
IMO- Mel Frank and his legendary wisdom (his 70's volume and 88 volumes are great), Jack Herrer with his medical break thru in the mmj fields and Jason Kings three volume cannibible are with out a doubt nothing less then master pieces in gathering information on the history, science and evolution of the marijuana plant. :jointsmile:
Some new strains I would like to try to get hold of are spirit of 76, Williams wonder, blueberry hash. ahhh in time :jointsmile:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xsnoder

Very True Hash. Most of the popular strains you see in Amsterdam were actually American west coast strains to begin with.,
I believe these are some of the strains taken to to the Netherlands, from the USA as clones or seed. Not all of course.
Skunk #1
Northern lights
Big bud,.. I do not believe you can find a true Big Bud in Amsterdam?
Afghani #1
Cali orange
Hawaiian indicia
Early girl.
Northern lights
The Dutch seed companies have come up with some mind bending strains and done good with what they got but the original "fine blended" genetics came from the pacific northwest Particularly the Humboldt area and Hawaii, not all, but the majority.
IMO- Mel Frank and his legendary wisdom (his 70's volume and 88 volumes are great), Jack Herrer with his medical break thru in the mmj fields and Jason Kings three volume cannibible are with out a doubt nothing less then master pieces in gathering information on the history, science and evolution of the marijuana plant. :jointsmile:
Some new strains I would like to try to get hold of are spirit of 76, Williams wonder, blueberry hash. ahhh in time :jointsmile:

---

I wish you good luck in your strain quest,xs!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnMonad

OK I'm interested. Please explain "We are all being played by some big move makers who don't want New Mexico to be a medical marijuana state! "

JM

---

http://www.health.state.nm.us/idb/me....4_8_30_10.pdf

It's a long read.
It gives all power to the Director of the DOH.
Conditions and producers can be axed without process. law or reason. The director can shut the whole thing down with one simple action.:thumbsup:



You have to ask yourselves.... Why would anyone slip this in the very last part of a three part document?
Why would this totally be omitted from the general public version or the press release?

JM I think your long mistrust of Dr. Vigil may prove true after all.

OUR MEDICAL CANNABIS PROGRAM IS BEING LED TO SLAUGHTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you like having a license, you better show up. If you like living in a medicla cannabis state, you owe it to the program to show up. If you have ever been touched by someone who cannabis helped.... you owe it to them to show up and say NO WAY!!! YOU CAN'T TAKE CANNABIS AWAY FROM US!!

SEE YOU AT THE MEETING IN SANTA FE 09/30/10!!

Not sure what you are talking about but the link is to HEALTH
CHAPTER 34 MEDICAL USE OF MARIJUANA
PART 4 LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCERS, PRODUCTION FACILITIES AND
DISTRIBUTION they are the statues of the law.I think you are being a little paranoid. What is going to be discussed is adding sales tax , increased fee, seeds,and inspection of product. There might be other things but those are the major things.

PatientNM
I think you are on point.
I read your link and I saw things that I would have caught the first time I read them in August.
I think we need to show up in force at the DOH meeting on the 30th.

What do you think? Can we a 500 people?

JM

see you there but I think 500??????

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coolslayer

I wish you good luck in your strain quest,xs!

---

Thanks brother. :jointsmile:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnMonad

PatientNM
I think you are on point.
I read your link and I saw things that I would have caught the first time I read them in August.
I think we need to show up in force at the DOH meeting on the 30th.

What do you think? Can we a 500 people?

JM

---

The sections in question did not make the first round. They magically got slipped in.... some how? by someone?


DOES ANYBODY HAVE A BUS THAT WILL TAKE A BUNCH OF PATIENTS FROM ABQ to SANT FE?

The RR will take you right to the Runnels building.
ALLLLL Aboarddddddddddddd!

7.34.4.8 PRODUCER LICENSING; GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A. The department may license two classes of producers:
(1) a qualified patient who shall produce no more than an adequate supply of marijuana for the
qualified patient‟s personal use only; and who may obtain from licensed non-profit producers a total of no more than
sixteen (16) seeds in a three-month period.


(2) The number of licenses issued by the department to non-profit private entities, and the
determination of which non-profit entities shall be licensed, shall be determined at the sole discretion of the
secretary, and those determinations shall be final.

(3) A non-profit private entity whose application for licensure is not approved by the secretary shall
not be entitled to further review.

(4) The secretary may periodically declare either â??openâ?� or â??closedâ?� application periods when private
entities‟ applications for licensure will or will not be received and considered by the department. That determination
shall be at the sole discretion of the secretary and shall not be subject to review. An application that is submitted by
a private entity outside of the â??openâ?� applications period shall not be considered by the department.

C. Factors considered: The secretary shall consider the overall health needs of qualified patients
and the safety of the public in determining the number of licenses to be issued to non-profit private entities and in
determining whether to open or close the applications period for private entities and may further consider:
(1) the sufficiency of the overall supply available to qualified patients statewide;


(5) Patients and medical providers designated as members of the non-profit producer‟s executive
board as required by this rule may not be persons employed by the non-profit producer.



(2) Private non-profit annual fee: A non-profit producer shall additionally submit to the medical
cannabis program as a non-refundable annual fee an amount equivalent to seven percent (7%) of the producer‟s total
annual gross receipts for the prior year. The producer shall submit the annual fee no later than January 31st of each
year.

R. Department testing
(1) The department or its designee may require a non-profit or patient medical cannabis producer to
provide samples of medical cannabis for testing for the presence of mold, bacteria or other contaminants. Producers
may be required to provide samples of medical cannabis to the department or its designee for the purpose of testing.
Producers shall bear the cost of any testing required by the department. Medical cannabis program employees or
their designees may possess those medical cannabis samples for the sole purpose of testing. The department shall
comply with the following testing requirements:
(a) The department shall maintain chain of custody documentation for any medical cannabis
sample taken;
(b) A written receipt shall be given to the LNPP or patient for all testing samples;
(c) All testing samples shall be placed into a sealed container and clearly labeled;
(d) All testing samples shall be tested by DOH or a designated testing facility;
(e) No more than sixteen (16) grams of medical cannabis shall be gathered for testing purposes
from a non-profit medical cannabis producer on any single occasion;
(f) No more than two (2) grams of medical cannabis shall be gathered for testing purposes from
a patient producer on any single occasion.
[7.34.4.8 NMAC - N, 12/15/2008]