Printable View
Well the tips of your fingernails would only contain traces of thc if he also smoked months ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Deige
Unless they ripped the fingernail out to test the part of the nail that was just formed by the body, there is NO way they could find RECENT evidence of thc in the fingernails.
Same thing with the hair. They would have to get his roots to go deep enough to find the THC evidence if it was recent.
3 sessions in 90 days can cause a failure so you need to use countermeasures.
Now for the people who think cutting his hair is going to be helpful think again. You don't want to cut your hair shorter than 3/4 of an inch maybe 1/2 if you get an easy tester but this isn't going to help this individual because 3/4 of an inch will give them his history going back about 45-55 days, 1/2 inch will give a history of 30-40 days and he smoked about a week ago so that hair is almost at the surface of the scalp.
The countermeasures have been listed many times before and I really am short on time so if the OP could do a search of if someone else wants to tell him about the commercial shampoos that are effective (not all are created equal), the acid and detergent or base and detergent methods, perms or straighteners, and the bleach and redye. With the brief use you stand a good chance of passing.
I'm going to have to start spending more time in the drug testing forum again because the hair testing advice as well as urine testing advice has been suspect lately.
Whatever dude. Smoking one time a week ago is not gonna screw you on a hair test. Hair just doesn't grow fast enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by FakeBoobsRule
And I'm not gonna recommend any shampoos because I'm not gonna tell him to do something that I don't yet trust myself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim123
Screw it dude, don't pay attention to the small details like 4 bowls a day for 2-3 days. 3 sessions in 90 days dude is what I said and I stand by that fact, go to the Quest website.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMojoRisin7127
Well I guess you are the foremost expert on hair testing and if you don't give it your seal of approval then it doesn't work? :rolleyes: There is a government funded test showing that Zydot and I believe it was Toxin Wash that both remove drug metabolites. It was a small sample study but it has been shown on this site and others that good results come from these shampoos and other methods. There is one guy who even spent about $500 doing his own testing on some of these products.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim123
But hey, since you don't like these products I guess they can't remove metabolites. :rolleyes:
Mojo, your post was axed because you were flaming FBR - and youve done it again. Dont be too suprised when the banhammer gets dropped on you this time.
I was trying to genuinely help the Tim123 since not many people had chimed in by that time to help. Then FBR directly insulted me. It is one thing to say he may have a better idea, but to insult me is another. Within the next few months, I was planning on starting an advertising campaign for my website. I hoped to talk to admins about spending a couple grand advertising here, but if they want to ban me, I guess I won't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt Toast
Taylor
I dont see anywhere in FBR's posts where insults were hurled at you. If you ever looked at all of FBRs past postings (and there are lots), you'll discover that hes well-researched and knowlegeable on the subject of drug testing and has both the credentials and the sheepskin to back it up. He didnt accumilate those rep points and achieved Moderator status by being ill-informed. To be frank, FBR was setting the record straight and if your skin isnt thick enough to handle it, then perhaps youve got a problem.
He quoted me in post #14, then followed up with a smart ass remark and rolling his eyes. Rolling your eyes to a stranger is a very disrespectful thing to do and I felt that was completely uncalled for. It isn't fair that I'm not allowed to express my feelings when somebody acts that way. Now also perhaps he was saying that very light-heartedly, however it is very difficult to convey that through text.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt Toast
You can express your feelings on the matter without resorting to inflammatory name-calling, which is in violation of the board rules dude. If thats not possible for you, then perhaps you should take up a creative-writing course.
Dude I'm actually trying to move past this. I enjoy this message board and I like being able to help people with things I have researched myself in the past and I don't wanna trash that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt Toast
You have already given me negative rep and reported me to the mods, yet still refuse to leave me alone regarding this thread. I think its about time you mind your own business anyway, nothing of what I said has been directed towards you. I mean, don't you have anything else to do today?
Taylor