The FOX Flip-Flop

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rusty Trichome

Couple of questions...
What does coverage of Miley Cyrus have to do with this post?
How's CNN's hourly coverage of Heath Ledger going, by the way?

What does your prejudice for Bill O'Reilly have to do with this post?

How is the prospect of a Fox debate laughable?
As compared to the MSNBC, CNN and UTube debates? Where they get the questions from planted questioners, snowmen, and Tim from Vermont. (the UFO technologies Question)

---

THANK YOU! Someone here has some sort of common sense. CNN and MSNBC are very, very biased themselves. They are very left leaning. And their ratings are in the shitter, wonder why...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 8182KSKUSH

Really no hard feelings, I respect people that can have fun, reasonable discussions, dragon. There are alot of people here that get very offended when you suggest that anything they think is wrong.:mad: Too bad, I just don't see how someone can get so caught up that they can't have a good discusion. Dragon you at least participate enough so that their can be a "back and forth" which is more than I can say for some.:D

---

I like the back and forth as long as it doesn't get personally nasty between the participants. No need to make personal insults or put words in people's mouths just to shoot down the mischaracterized idea ("Oh, so you think blah. Then you're an idiot!") That's the one that bugs me the most --- I'm the one who gets to say what I think. But personal insults against politicians (Mittwit!) or news channels (Wakadoos!) do not bother me at all! Some people get so wrapped up that they ruin it, and I think a lot of members who might participate don't bother because they don't like the tone.

Anyway, Kush, you keep it lively. And that shit-eating grin on the face of your avatar just makes everything you say twice as sarcastic! Ha ha! Who the hell is that guy?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dragonrider

I like the back and forth as long as it doesn't get personally nasty between the participants. No need to make personal insults or put words in people's mouths just to shoot down the mischaracterized idea ("Oh, so you think blah. Then you're an idiot!") That's the one that bugs me the most --- I'm the one who gets to say what I think. But personal insults against politicians (Mittwit!) or news channels (Wakadoos!) do not bother me at all! Some people get so wrapped up that they ruin it, and I think a lot of members who might participate don't bother because they don't like the tone.

Anyway, Kush, you keep it lively. And that shit-eating grin on the face of your avatar just makes everything you say twice as sarcastic! Ha ha! Who the hell is that guy?

---

Well said!
You are right! It is so annoying when peopel take personal offense when public figures or News channels are criticized!
That guy as my avatar, he was the most prolific mob hit man ever. Kuklinski! The Ice Man, and that's exactly why I picked him for my avatar, the shit eating grin translates what my tone usually is 99.9% of the time! He is not by any means a hero or anything, but he is extremly fascinating! Watch some of the interviews that he did from prison!
Interviewer: "So what was in the needle?"
Kuklinski: "A heart attack.":D