/\/\/\/\ erm do you know what propaganda is? for if you did you would realise how retarded it is to say "you can't change the facts with propaganda or dirty words"
Printable View
/\/\/\/\ erm do you know what propaganda is? for if you did you would realise how retarded it is to say "you can't change the facts with propaganda or dirty words"
Show me something in the article that isn't true, some facts, other than name calling and you say so.Quote:
Originally Posted by snowblind
Well the whole article is propagnaderous as it is questionning the motives for IRAN's nuclear defense program.
Yet in the cold war america battled with russia over the PERCIVED THREAT, it created at russias nuclear capability.
It mentions no where in the article AMERICA's own nuclear weapons programs and the reasons it has them .
We all know the main reason that a country has a nuclear weapon is front, started by America and their dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
We all know the destructive power these weapons hold, yet countries still choose to make them, why is that. It is becuase other countries still have them and so the threat is still there.
How can america justify invading a country because the have WMD when they have them themselves. The only way we will truly get rid of all WMD would be for ALL countries to get rid of them.
Is that going the happen, no.
so we will continue to be subject to this, till one of them drops one and we all pay.
So, you also believe Iran is lying when they say they don't want the bomb and it's only about energy.Quote:
Originally Posted by snowblind
America didn't create A "nuclear Russia" Stalin did that so he could in prison eastern Europe for 50 years (kill millions of people) and as a deterrent to stop freedom.Quote:
Yet in the cold war america battled with russia over the PERCIVED THREAT, it created at russias nuclear capability.
The part that keeps getting by all who try and rationalize it. America (and all existing nuclear powers) have not threatened to "wipe" anybody off the face of the earth, nor have they called any country or race of people "an insult to humanity"Quote:
It mentions no where in the article AMERICA's own nuclear weapons programs and the reasons it has them .
1 We bombed Japan only AFTER they refused to surrender, knowing that the war was lost. The bombing saved 100 of thousands of American lives.Quote:
We all know the main reason that a country has a nuclear weapon is front, started by America and their dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
2 The guy who starts the fight doesn't get to cry "foul" if he gets beat up.
3 If Japan hadn't attacked us, the odds of us bombing them is about 4 billion to 1.
4 And most important, If Japan hadn't attacked us there would have never been a "Manhattan Project"
Actually America (and Russia) are dismantling there stockpiles, almost 50% so far, and niether country is building "new" bombs to replace the existing old ones.Quote:
We all know the destructive power these weapons hold, yet countries still choose to make them, why is that. It is becuase other countries still have them and so the threat is still there.
Who says we're invading Iran ?Quote:
How can america justify invading a country because the have WMD when they have them themselves.
And stop more countries from getting themQuote:
The only way we will truly get rid of all WMD would be for ALL countries to get rid of them.
When one of them nukes London, Paris, or NY in the name of their God, all of this nonsense about trying to justify/rationalize letting them have the bomb will stop, sad but that's what it's going to take for some people.Quote:
Is that going the happen, no.
so we will continue to be subject to this, till one of them drops one and we all pay.
Iran just tested a missile that has the potetial of reaching Eastern Europe. But hey, no big deal right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozarks
Have a good one!:s4:
Yes, and mostly all of them share the same propaganda, but maybe worded differently.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozarks
Wait, where did you hear that? I just checked most of the main news sources, and I see nothing about that... not even on FOX News. And is that supposed missile that was tested a nuclear missile? Wouldn't this have been breaking news, P4B?Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Ozarks, you missed the whole crux of what i was saying.
Wood for trees
I believe I addressed your statement point by point, if I missed something please let me know.Quote:
Originally Posted by snowblind
Iran test-fired a new ballistic missile last week, on the day the U.S. held a summit on Mideast peace at Annapolis, Md.Quote:
Originally Posted by mfqr
The missile has a range of 2,000 kilometers, and is capable of reaching Israel, U.S. Army bases in the Middle East and eastern European cities, including Moscow, said reports.
The new missile is an improvement on the existing Shahab-3 missile, said reports.
Called the Ashoura, it uses solid fuel instead of the Shihab's liquid fuel, which gives the missile a faster launch sequence, making it harder to detect.
Political experts said the timing of the launch was significant, given Iran's opposition to it.
Iran Tests 2,000km Missile
Iran tested a newly-developed ballistic missile on the day of the Annapolis conference, Channel 10 reported Wednesday.
Behind a poster of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei reading: "Missile maneuver of the Great Prophet," Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard tests the long-range Shihab-3 missile in a central desert area of Iran.
Photo: AP [file]
The Ashoura missile has a range of 2,000 kilometers and is capable of reaching Israel, US Army bases in the Middle East and eastern European cities.
According to the report, the new missile is an improvement to the existing Shihab-3 missile. The Ashoura uses solid fuel instead of the Shihab's liquid fuel, giving it a significantly faster launch sequence which is harder to detect.
Iranian Defense Minister Gen. Mostafa Muhammad-Najjar had announced the development of the new missile on the day of the summit, but had not specified whether it had actually been tested.
'Iran tested new missile during summit' | Jerusalem Post
It'll probably be out in the larger news agencies tomarrow. I actually heard about this on FOX this morning.
Have a good one!:s4: