So why not give this lil' ol' lady, that put her ass on the line, a medal for a hundy? Seems there were PLENTY of hundys available for earmarks.Quote:
Originally Posted by epxroot
Have a good one!:s4:
Printable View
So why not give this lil' ol' lady, that put her ass on the line, a medal for a hundy? Seems there were PLENTY of hundys available for earmarks.Quote:
Originally Posted by epxroot
Have a good one!:s4:
Because it is against the constitution to use the peoples tax dollars to offer awards. He said he had no problem with donating a hundy of his own money out of his own packet, and in fact he even proposed to the rest to do the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Where does it state that??? The Congressional Gold Medal started off with our "Founding Fathers"! Isn't that one of his key phrases?Quote:
Originally Posted by epxroot
Office of the Clerk
Have a good one!:s4:
My, my, my feel free to twist it however you would like. :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Here's how it works, Paul adds the earmarks to a bill that he knows he will end up voting against. The bill passes anyway, and some of the money goes back to his constituents. Yeah, it is playing the Washington money game, but if the other's in Congress would vote against the meat in these bills like they should, Paul's district wouldn't see a dime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
The only way to stop this is the line item veto and no earmarks attached to legislation.
BTW, I loved his example of the Armenian legislation and the trouble it caused. What right does Congress have to condemn actions in foreign countries? For that matter, Congress does not have the right to condemn Rush Limbaugh or Moveon for their remarks.
if the bill is going to pass he is still allowed to allocate funding to his constituents. That same $400 Mil would have been around for someone else to use.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud