So tell me, what's "it like" when ya post from some of these assclown journalists from the left?Quote:
Originally Posted by medicinal
Have a good one!:s4:
Printable View
So tell me, what's "it like" when ya post from some of these assclown journalists from the left?Quote:
Originally Posted by medicinal
Have a good one!:s4:
I can't believe you think there are any "assclown journalists" on the left.lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Lets see if I can name any. Bill Maher,Geraldo Reviera any more?
Bill Maher is most certainly NOT an assclown.Quote:
Originally Posted by killerweed420
coulter is just another media whore. whether they are spouting their preprogrammed opinions from the left or from the right, they are all nothing more than walking advertisements for retroactive abortion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
I agree on both Ann Coulter and Nancy Grace. Pre-programmed opinions from both left and right, designed to be contrarian and controversial. Ratings-ploys rather than actual considered thought. Retroactive abortions are a good idea there, Delusions, with no other justification than obnoxiousness.
Doctors' income isn't excessive compared with the training they've received, and it's getting lower and lower with each passing year unless you own a successful large practice or take on more fee-for-service "luxury" work like cosmetic procedures. The real money-makers in health care are the insurance companies, who increasingly dictate how we can treat patients, and hospital and pharmaceutical corporations. Every year fewer Americans can afford medical treatment or insurance, and fewer doctors can afford--or are allowed by insurance restrictions--to provide them adequate care. Trial lawyers don't really affect that, but Coulter (a former corporate attorney herself, by the way) loves to throw up smokescreens instead of talk about real issues. She would stand in the way of health care for all because she herself can afford it on her own. She doesn't care a whit about those who cannot. Nobody on the right does. From a simple business perspective, it doesn't make sense to me why anyone who makes less than $175K per annum would ever consider supporting that party, which votes against low- and middle-income people at every opportunity.